After all this time, you still don't have a clue what you're talking about. Have you actually thought about what the First Amendment means? I mean what it actually means and not some idealized fantasy about what you think it's supposed to be or should be.
Hulk Hogan has the freedom to say whatever he wants to say as long as it doesn't incite, encourage or instruct others to commit acts of violence against others. There's absolutely no such thing as completely, 100% unlimited freedom to say ANYTHING you want and there never has been; there have always been some restrictions placed upon it if it puts other people's lives at risk. If he wants to say the N-word, he can say it and he can't put thrown in jail, fined or sued by anyone for saying. However, once a person decides to express their right to say whatever they want, they also have to endure the potential consequences that comes from the fallout of exercising said right. If you want to go on a racist tirade online and post it to YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, send it to major news organizations, then you're absolutely entitled to do so. It's also the absolute right of friends or even family to want absolutely nothing to do with you afterwards and for your place of employment to no longer want your services. If you work for anyone from Microsoft to friggin' Taco Bell, use racial slurs and it can be proven that you said it, you're gonna get fired.
It's a word that I wish would just go away forever, but that's not gonna happen. I don't like the fact that there's something of a double standard pertaining to the N-word, but there's nothing that can change that. It's a loaded word, perhaps the single most loaded word in the history of Western Civilization, and the inescapable fact is that a white person using it is taking some degree of risk whenever it's used.
No, the founding fathers meant absolute, ultimate, unfetted freedom of speech. You could say what you like, when you like, how you like, to whom you like. However, it took people like Oliver Wendell Holmes to get laws set up to prevent things like libel, slander and other laws pertaining to speech.
I actually think that the laws on what people can say should be more restrictive, and that the media should be held to greater account for exposing this, since they invaded Hogan's privacy. If I was Hulk Hogan, I would ask my lawyer to find something to sue TMZ and the National Enquirer for every cent, and send them bankrupt. I am sure that there would be a lot of Holywood stars who would help finance his case.
Sure, you can say what you like, and suffer the consequences. It just smacks of hypocrisy that you bag Hogan for saying something vile, and yet these same nothing loser critics, who no-one cares if they live or die, are allowed to say just as vile things about Hogan, and most of you losers allow it, because it is the only way you can feel good about your pathetic lives, by dragging the achievers down to your level of mediocrity.
Also, let's face it, unless you are black, why do you care? Does the white come off? What's in it for you to defend blacks? Does it make you look good, and not look like a racist in public (even though most people are racist in private, I bet)? I bet you profile people, and judge them by appearance too, you F'ing hypocritical loser? So, what is your agenda, or are you just jumping on a popular bandwagon?
You're right to an extent. You have the right to say the stupidest, most idiotic drivel ever written, and I have a right to point out your stupidity, to wonder about your lack of intelligence, and to give you enough rope to hang yourself and expose your folly to the rest to the world, and I enjoy doing it. WWE needs Hulk Hogan more than he needs them, so it's their loss. If I was Vince, I would hope that Hogan doesn't dig up dirt on me, and use the same media who condemned him, to turn the spotlight on McMahon again. Hogan almost got Vince sent to jail last time, so who knows what Hogan has on Vince, and maybe ask for his job back, or else.
