Mac Attack
I'm neat.
I have been wondering this as of late and decided to put it up to the IWC.
We all know that Dark matches occur before the main show/PPV. However the results of said matches ahave no importance what so ever as usually they are guyw who are either jobber to low midcard status who have been feuding on the dark match scene. On PPV's you have matches that aren't seen even if the quality of said match was good and even if there is a feud behind the match.
So with that being said I truly believe that the Dark matches should be announced by the WWE. I don't know exactly how they should word it possibly "Before we went on air (insert name) beat (insert name) in a match that had the crowd out of their seats." I think not only would this add credibility to guys who rarely get mentioned but also would be a nice segway into the show.
However I am steadfast in saying that they must do this for PPVs. They usally have a match that was not quite able to make the card however is a part of a current feud. For example not many people know that Santino and Kozlov beat the tag champs in a non title match at Capitol Punishment. I think this would be nice to know and would also give insight into the other possible feuds that go on in the WWE.
We all know that Dark matches occur before the main show/PPV. However the results of said matches ahave no importance what so ever as usually they are guyw who are either jobber to low midcard status who have been feuding on the dark match scene. On PPV's you have matches that aren't seen even if the quality of said match was good and even if there is a feud behind the match.
So with that being said I truly believe that the Dark matches should be announced by the WWE. I don't know exactly how they should word it possibly "Before we went on air (insert name) beat (insert name) in a match that had the crowd out of their seats." I think not only would this add credibility to guys who rarely get mentioned but also would be a nice segway into the show.
However I am steadfast in saying that they must do this for PPVs. They usally have a match that was not quite able to make the card however is a part of a current feud. For example not many people know that Santino and Kozlov beat the tag champs in a non title match at Capitol Punishment. I think this would be nice to know and would also give insight into the other possible feuds that go on in the WWE.