What gives you the right to speak for everyone? Because you see a problem with it, it means others do?
You act as if I want people to go around calling WWE a gay sport. I personally dont see a problem with wrestling or with gay people being involved but why on earth would you give people more ammunition to attack wrestling fans? They couldnt find someone else besides the guy who wants to fit the "flaming ******" stereotype? Hes proud of the crap hes done. Again, there are plenty or gay guys and plenty of bloggers/web sensations out there for WWE if they feel like kissing ass. But picking the worst out of the bunch isnt going to bring anything good.
You can't label a certain group of people based on one person. That's purely stupid.
I'm not labeling a group of people based on one person, I'm analyzing groups of people based on what those groups act like. Idk if you're aware of those videos online "SHit black/white/hispanic girls/guys say". That video isnt implying that every single hispanic person says "mami", but a lot of them do, or any of the ones that attract attention do. Thats how a stereotype is born. Just because you may know 1 or 2 people who dont fit the stereotype it doesnt make it an all out fallacy.
What does being a human have anything to do with it? He said you have a vagina, that's it.
He said you have a vagina to a guy with a fauxhawk. He was implying that the guy possessed feminine characteristics. What guys possess feminine characteristics? Gay guys. case closed. Please dont attempt to prove how calling a guy a female doesnt mean hes gay, its not going to work.
Who the fuck goes up to someone and asks that? I'm sure you've pulled that completely out of you ass.
No one says that in that way, I'm exaggerating because you seem to think that if your friends dont say certain things then no one does.
Where do you hear this? Pretty much any contact sport could fit this.
Everywhere. Stop a young person on the street and ask them if they think wrestling is gay. And no, other contact sports dont fit the same mold. No one says that UFC/MMA is gay or that boxing is gay.
Again, where did you hear this?
Um, the teaming with GLADD, the inviting someone who has zero relevance to wrestling like Perez Hilton, the removal of gay jokes, etc
Since when do the UFC fighters show gimmicks? Since when does being over with the crowd guarantee a world title match? Two completely different sports. WWE doesn't target fans by sexual orientation.
So because WWE showcases gimmicks they have to target fans by demographics. No one was trying to get gay ppl to watch or be politically correct when Guerrero and Lesnar where around, I gaurantee you that. And no, they dont target fans by sexual orientation, Perez Hilton and the deal with GLAAD where out of the goodness of Vince's heart. What a sweet man, so benevolent.
That's understood. But like I've said, it's two minutes on tv and he's gone. That's it. He's not doing anything to cause any kind of uproar.
Have you ever watched The Soup. Its a show on E! that takes show clips and plays them with a guy making jokes about them. Last time they took a clip from wwe it was when triple h said nash broke his heart. the people who watch the soup are those pop culture consumed people, people who would make a great addition to the wwe universe. but what happens when they played the triple h clip, they made him look gay and people laugh. If they made Triple H look gay, the Perez Hilton segment will be that 10x worse. That feeds the casual TV fan, who still views homosexuality as wrong (dont let the media fool u, most people still think this way) the idea that WWE is gay and therefore it becomes a joke and no one watches.
Where did you get the idea that the WWE is so worried about homosexuals fans? I don't get it.
Give me another semi logical reason for Perez to be on RAW. And dont give me the celebrity excuse because hes a b lister on his best day and again the only people who read his blog are mostly gay.
Then judge him on being a douche. Mention nothing about him being a homosexual because it's completely irrelevant.
This is the problem, as soon as someone straight even begins to comment on someone being gay they're labeled a bigot and told to shut up. This is what fuels hate into people and leads people to say "why shouldn't I call them names if they have no problem doing the same to me".