And again, my whole argument wasn't based on title runs or classic matches
But title runs and classic matches are very important factors when deciding on whether one wrestler is better than another.
Savage = World Champ, Kane = World champ
Savage = IC Champ, Kane = IC champ
But Savage was a WAY better World and IC Champion than Kane. You don't become great by simply winning a title. You become great by what you do with the title and how much credibility you give it.
Kane is also a Hardcore champ and a Tag team Champ, something that Savage is not
That's irrelevant because those titles meant jack shit when Kane won them, and he didn't increase the credibility of those titles during the short times while he held them.
Kane is a triple crown champion, savage is not
Kane has won every major title that WWE has to offer
But he didn't do anything with those titles. They were all forgetful and insignificant reigns. All of the title reigns Savage had in the WWF had much more significance than all of Kane's.