Of course this is huge news, you'd be a fool to suggest otherwise. Just look at the response this has generated. I only heard about this announcement about 2 hours ago, and there's already 12 pages devoted to this in this thread. Obviously it has people talking. Count on a spike in ratings to accompany this announcement.
Interesting timing. Bischoff and Hogan to TNA has been talked about, in theory, for quite some time. But it never happened before. Then right on the heels of Shane McMahon abruptly leaving WWE, it finally happens. Interesting coincidence, or is it more than this?
I can't help but wonder if it's short term gain with long term pain. Interestingly I was reading another thread on this site earlier today, talking about how TNA was heading in the right direction. Because it was getting rid of some of the older guys. The remaining older guys were being used to push younger talent to get them over. New young talent was being signed. TNA originals were finally taking on prominent roles in the company. Storylines were getting better, as was the action.
Now if TNA becomes the Eric and Terry show, doesn't this have the potential to be a step backwards overall? Yes, huge interest and high numbers from the get-go. But when it becomes apparent that profile, marketability, star-power, etc., aside, Hogan is a late 50's crippled old wrestler who simply won't be physically able to bring to TNA what he brought to WCW over a decade ago, what then? As a GM, or a manager, Hogan won't have the same type of impact that nWo had when he was still able to bend his knees. Can you catch lightning in a bottle twice? Maybe, maybe not, we'll see I guess.
What happens when Bischoff and Russo can't get along? People earlier this morning in the other thread I was talking about above were praising TNA's new creative direction, and Russo deserves at least some of the credit for this. Now is he gone? So much for the new creative direction.
What about the new young talent? Last week there was a big fuss about Nigel and his program with Angle. Will this be overshadowed by the attention that Hogan will ultimately receive? What about AJ, does he give up the belt to Hogan? What about the speculation that such guys as Mr. Kennedy or Umaga may be on their way, will anyone really care now if they come or not?
I'm not saying that Hogan and Bischoff to TNA is a bad thing. I'm just saying that it raises a lot of other questions that could be detrimental to TNA in the long term. Not to mention the fact that this will motivate Vince to step up his game, which he undoubtedly will, and while this competition may be great for us wrestling fans, I'm not so sure it will ultimately be great for TNA.
Interesting timing. Bischoff and Hogan to TNA has been talked about, in theory, for quite some time. But it never happened before. Then right on the heels of Shane McMahon abruptly leaving WWE, it finally happens. Interesting coincidence, or is it more than this?
I can't help but wonder if it's short term gain with long term pain. Interestingly I was reading another thread on this site earlier today, talking about how TNA was heading in the right direction. Because it was getting rid of some of the older guys. The remaining older guys were being used to push younger talent to get them over. New young talent was being signed. TNA originals were finally taking on prominent roles in the company. Storylines were getting better, as was the action.
Now if TNA becomes the Eric and Terry show, doesn't this have the potential to be a step backwards overall? Yes, huge interest and high numbers from the get-go. But when it becomes apparent that profile, marketability, star-power, etc., aside, Hogan is a late 50's crippled old wrestler who simply won't be physically able to bring to TNA what he brought to WCW over a decade ago, what then? As a GM, or a manager, Hogan won't have the same type of impact that nWo had when he was still able to bend his knees. Can you catch lightning in a bottle twice? Maybe, maybe not, we'll see I guess.
What happens when Bischoff and Russo can't get along? People earlier this morning in the other thread I was talking about above were praising TNA's new creative direction, and Russo deserves at least some of the credit for this. Now is he gone? So much for the new creative direction.
What about the new young talent? Last week there was a big fuss about Nigel and his program with Angle. Will this be overshadowed by the attention that Hogan will ultimately receive? What about AJ, does he give up the belt to Hogan? What about the speculation that such guys as Mr. Kennedy or Umaga may be on their way, will anyone really care now if they come or not?
I'm not saying that Hogan and Bischoff to TNA is a bad thing. I'm just saying that it raises a lot of other questions that could be detrimental to TNA in the long term. Not to mention the fact that this will motivate Vince to step up his game, which he undoubtedly will, and while this competition may be great for us wrestling fans, I'm not so sure it will ultimately be great for TNA.