A thought ran through my head recently, and I followed it all the way to a brilliant idea for a double main event match at SummerSlam. I will present the idea here, and welcome reaction, comments on its feasibility, and whehter you'd be interesting in seeing it happen.
This is good. You usually have good and original ideas IC.
Let's operate under the assumption that ShowMiz (or some other heel tag team) heads into SummerSlam with the Tag Team Titles. Let us also assume that Shawn Michaels takes enough time off to last until the SSlam buildup begins. Finally, let's assume Bret Hart is functional this Sunday against Vince McMahon.
Okay, nice start. I say even if Shawn Michaels loses this weekend to The Undertaker, there will be some loophole in the retirement and he'll be back by SummerSlame. I think Hart can work a great match still if he's in shape. Or, he could have a stroke in the ring against Vince and drop dead. It's pretty close, really. But that's not the point of this thread, now is it? Let's get down to business.
How brilliant would it be to watch Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels - two men inexorably linked as all-time rivals - challenge for the WWF Tag Team Titles?
Well, every streak must come to an end. Wether Taker's does this weekend or not, your streak of having good ideas
has ended this week. With all respect to you, as you're a truly great poster, this is stupidity. Sheer idiocy. What would be the point in this? Sure, half the Internet Wrestling Community get the chance to cream their pants over it come August, but nothing more than that comes good from it. This exactly is what we
do not need in the tag team division. I want the tag team division fixed. And by fixed, I don't mean putting two big-star power names, one of which who we don't really know how long he'll be able to go before he has to quit, in a tag-team to challenge another team. it was okay when they did it with Jericho and Show, or Miz and Show, as it helped build credibility back to the titles which didn't have a shred left. But, no, this is just a bad idea.
It would provide both men some well deserved closure. It would be a treat for the fans who have watched this rivalry blossom since 1992. And if you but the Tag belts on a team like Seamus and McIntyre, it could even serve as another McMahon-centric angle to try to watch the old faves take out McMahons new team.
If I'm not mistaken, didn't the two men recieve their well-deserved closure on January 4th when they hugged in the middle of a WWE ring, on live national television. That was the last time, and only time I believe (?) that these two interacted since Bret returned and we don't need to throw together some storyline out of nowhere building on past events that already have been patched up and had closure. It would be something for the fans who have watched the fued grow since 1992 to see, but so was the hug on the 4th of January. Not to mention the fact that more common fans aren't as familiar with the history between the two. I mean, it's possible I'm wrong, and that it's just me, but I don't think Hart has been getting as good as of reaction as he used to. Of course that's normal, as it's a new generation, which is probably another reason why they're lacking in their reactions. And that little piece about Sheamus and McIntyre winning the titles: Well, I believed I addressed that issue in the paragraph above about why we don't need more built-off star power tag teams, and actual tag teams, although that is a different subject for a different thread. Not to mention I think we only need those McMahon-centric fueds once, maybe twice a year, and that they should be spaced out by six months or so. So that would be about a month or two to early to see a second McMahon fued this year, if we need another at all. Plus it would probably be centered around both McMahon and Hart, and have much focus on the Montreal Screwjob, and both have been used this year. I'm just saying, even if all else works, it might get too repetitive. Although I'm getting off topic, and that last part wasn't the idea you had, I'll wrap up here.
I am anxious to hear thoughts on this idea.
And I am anxious to hear your thoughts on my comments.