How does it help someone if you tell them you're doing a good job when you think they're doing what they do poorly? I can think of no better way to hurt someone then that. I want TNA to succeed, and for exactly the same reasons (competition is good), but at the same time, I'm not willing to pretend I like something which I think is awful for the sake of TNA's success.Jericho has good points, but instead of acting like a smart-ass why doesn't he actually praise TNA on a daily basis instead of giving them criticism, even if it is constructive. If he so cares about competition and the business, I think it would be helpful for TNA to have a name like Chris Jericho endorse them, instead of pointing out a move they made, which is subjective, and calling them a "bush league".
It wouldn't kill him, but he doesn't believe it and he isn't getting paid for it. Why should he shill for TNA for free? Just because he's a supporter of wrestling doesn't mean he owes the world free rubs. Why isn't he out there vocally supporting ROH? He's been seen often enough at their shows. Same reason.Zeven_Zion said:Saying a few nice words about the company every now and then won't kill him.
"Hey guys! Check this AJ Styles kid on TNA, he's awesome!"
"Hey guys! I'm really liking [insert storyline here]. Check it out on TNA every Thursday!"
That's your martyr complex acting up again. You're operating under the mistaken premise that if someone supports a concept, they have to ignore any other impulses they have in support of that concept. To you, anything less is a veiled attack. For that matter, how is chastising TNA wrong? I was chastised several times by my parents growing up, but it was because they wanted to guide me to be a better person, not because they had a secret plan to demean and diminish me.Zeven_Zion said:All of this leads me to believe that this whole "we want TNA to grow bigger because we need competition" is just a nicer way to make your arguments not seem like chastising.
Let me explain it! TNA is very obviously the 2nd place company. By attacking the WWE- and the WWE ignoring it- they are allowing their competition to set the terms of the battle. TNA allows the WWE to say "they are not worth our time".Zeven_Zion said:And how does mentioning another company or bashing another company make you seem second rate? I never, ever understood that. If WWE took a shot at TNA, would that make them seem second rate?
If the WWE were to respond- and more then the occasional swat, which they aren't even doing, they wouldn't appear 2nd rate, since they are the majority company, but they would certainly appear concerned about TNA- giving the fans the idea that there was something on TNA that the WWE didn't want them watching.
TNA is trying to pick a battle that the WWE has no interest in. When you're the little guy trying to pick on the big guy, and the big guy doesn't give a fuck, you always look a little second-rate.