FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
It sounds odd to say, but the fact is that the WWE has been stockpiling wrestlers to keep them from TNA, but in the end, there isn't enough talent. There are about 1200 midcarders, most of which cannot get on TV because, well, the suck.
The WWE insists on maintaining two rosters and two titles. I think this is stupid. The reason the main events seem so boring is that they are always the same. The reason they are all the same is that the WWE maintains a roster of 100 guys with 95 midcarders. Some of the midcarders get opportunities, but there are only five guys who actually matter. HHH, Cena, Orton, Batista, and Undertaker are the only guys who have to be in the main event to work. Edge can work a midcard feud. HHH is even trying.
The problem is that none of these guys do what professional wrestlers are supposed to do. They don't make people care about them. For all the "talent" that posters will claim Dolph Ziggler, Evan Bourne, etc. have, no one cares about them. Shit, Bourne's finisher is more over than he is. That's not how it's supposed to be. Shelton Benjamin is not a great professional wrestler. He is a great athlete. He is a terrible professional wrestler because he can't get consistently over with the crowd.
The brandsplit needs to end in order to establish an actual pecking order. The midcard can be comprised of a one off Cena vs. Swagger match, while it is Orton's turn to wrestle for the title. While it may seem that you can elevate new wrestlers faster by splitting the brands, I argue that the opposite is true. You can't put John Morrison and The Miz both in first time title matches. One of the shows is always going to have to have two older stars in the main event. So, if we eliminate the brandsplit, the more established guys can focus on putting people over, and eventually, when a lower card guy wins the title, it means more. Right now, it's like, oh, well, you won one of the titles, so you are the second best champion. Now, all of a sudden, without the brandsplit, one gets elevated for real, instead of as a side project, gets over with the crowd, and establishes his name. People care more, and a new talent is found instead of a place holder.
I am all for a purging of the roster. So many guys have no talent for being a professional wrestler. This means they can't create a following. Get rid of them. If they get over in TNA, awesome. If not, well, cool. Either way, if you slim the roster down to the people the fans care about, you get an entire card of talent, instead of a card full of people.
Now, that is not to say that no midcarders are doing their job. Kofi and Christian have done an amazing job of getting and staying over. Regal always gets a reaction. That is why these guys always seem to find their way onto the first hour of PPV, and the heroes of the IWC barely make it onto SD!
The WWE insists on maintaining two rosters and two titles. I think this is stupid. The reason the main events seem so boring is that they are always the same. The reason they are all the same is that the WWE maintains a roster of 100 guys with 95 midcarders. Some of the midcarders get opportunities, but there are only five guys who actually matter. HHH, Cena, Orton, Batista, and Undertaker are the only guys who have to be in the main event to work. Edge can work a midcard feud. HHH is even trying.
The problem is that none of these guys do what professional wrestlers are supposed to do. They don't make people care about them. For all the "talent" that posters will claim Dolph Ziggler, Evan Bourne, etc. have, no one cares about them. Shit, Bourne's finisher is more over than he is. That's not how it's supposed to be. Shelton Benjamin is not a great professional wrestler. He is a great athlete. He is a terrible professional wrestler because he can't get consistently over with the crowd.
The brandsplit needs to end in order to establish an actual pecking order. The midcard can be comprised of a one off Cena vs. Swagger match, while it is Orton's turn to wrestle for the title. While it may seem that you can elevate new wrestlers faster by splitting the brands, I argue that the opposite is true. You can't put John Morrison and The Miz both in first time title matches. One of the shows is always going to have to have two older stars in the main event. So, if we eliminate the brandsplit, the more established guys can focus on putting people over, and eventually, when a lower card guy wins the title, it means more. Right now, it's like, oh, well, you won one of the titles, so you are the second best champion. Now, all of a sudden, without the brandsplit, one gets elevated for real, instead of as a side project, gets over with the crowd, and establishes his name. People care more, and a new talent is found instead of a place holder.
I am all for a purging of the roster. So many guys have no talent for being a professional wrestler. This means they can't create a following. Get rid of them. If they get over in TNA, awesome. If not, well, cool. Either way, if you slim the roster down to the people the fans care about, you get an entire card of talent, instead of a card full of people.
Now, that is not to say that no midcarders are doing their job. Kofi and Christian have done an amazing job of getting and staying over. Regal always gets a reaction. That is why these guys always seem to find their way onto the first hour of PPV, and the heroes of the IWC barely make it onto SD!