shattered dreams
Hexagonal Hedonist
By having a belt on each brand the wwe has already made it at least somewhat less of an accomplishment to be the main champion. Now they have guys without much experience or established characters winning those belts in Sheamus and Swagger. My question is does this signal another step in the downgrade of what it means to hold those belts?
Equally interesting is the TNA championship becoming a little more prestigious? Last 5 champion reigns for WWE championship: Cena, Sheamus, Cena, Batista, Cena; for World Heavyweight Championship: Jeff Hardy (now in TNA), CM Punk, Undertaker, Jericho, Swagger; for TNA Championship: Sting, Foley, Angle, Styles, RVD. The name power is there for TNA and they have been putting a lot of work into their top division lately.
Obviously, on a global sense it means a lot more to be a Champion in WWE because of the size of the company but simply looking at how the title is being used within each company it is interesting. Is too much too soon going to hurt the WWE in the long run if they keep using the belt in an attempt to fast-track younger talent instead of building them up beforehand like traditionally it has been done?
Equally interesting is the TNA championship becoming a little more prestigious? Last 5 champion reigns for WWE championship: Cena, Sheamus, Cena, Batista, Cena; for World Heavyweight Championship: Jeff Hardy (now in TNA), CM Punk, Undertaker, Jericho, Swagger; for TNA Championship: Sting, Foley, Angle, Styles, RVD. The name power is there for TNA and they have been putting a lot of work into their top division lately.
Obviously, on a global sense it means a lot more to be a Champion in WWE because of the size of the company but simply looking at how the title is being used within each company it is interesting. Is too much too soon going to hurt the WWE in the long run if they keep using the belt in an attempt to fast-track younger talent instead of building them up beforehand like traditionally it has been done?