It can happen. If you pull a big name from MMA. (But he has to be a credible name) have have him go over Brock, Cena, Reigns, Rusev, Sheamus it will happen. It's all about booking. They have to be booked to win. I'm going to get Killed for this but Cena isn't special. Never has been. Never will be. We can debate this till the cows come home. He just has been booked that way. 14 clean losses. In a ten year span will make anyone special. It's all about the booking. If booked righ any can be anything you make them in the WWE. It's a TV show. The storyline is written right and now Jessica Jones is kicking everyone's ass on her show. Same premise. As much as we all don't like it RAW isn't an a wrestling show. It's a show that has wrestling in it. Those are two different things. We just have to be made to believe that the guy they are pushing can beat all the top guys. For instance:
Cena is special. Top guys don't grow on trees. If Cena wasn't special, then WWE would make 50 of him and have 50 top guys. Have a guy come in and go over Cena, Rusev, Reigns, Lesnar and Sheamus? Yeah that is a great plan. Have an inexperienced guy come in and beat all their top guys with no guarantee that he will stay or be interesting.
Crimson went undefeated for a year in TNA. Never got close to being over.
Vince Russo booked an entertainment show with wrestling in it. This is nowhere that.
DB beat three Hall of Famers in one night. It pissed me off. It really did. Because there's no way that happens. No way. It shouldn't have happen to begin with. It insults the legacy of Batista, Orton and Hunter. But the crowd are it up. It was a storybook ending to a story. The little guy won.
Daniel Bryan won a singles then triple threat match. It is not like he beat a fresh HHH then a fresh Batista and a fresh Orton by himself.
Unbelievable but it happened. So here in the WWE ANYTHING can happen.
A lot from people from my generation do not like Cena. A lot of us feel like it's insulting that he has been on Top this long and that he is considered to be as great as he is. If you gave pushes like he has to anyone they would be considered as great as he is. I'm sorry. It's just my honest opinion. But we aren't in control. Vince and Co. are.
Again, if Vince could have 50 John Cena's, he would. He can't. Cena is special. Rock was special. Austin was. Hogan was. You can't make top guys, they have to make themselves.
Look at it this way.... If there would've been more of a variety of top guys. If there was no superior top guy. If there wasn't a 13 year Cena push the WWE would've been a lot better off. Maybe different guy would've shined through. Maybe other guys would've stayed around. Maybe other great wrestlers that are tearing it up all over the world would be here. The state of wrestling today would be better.im rambling.lol
If there was no one special, WWE would be in horrible shape. If there was no guy that you could count on, then why would we care? What you are talking about is 50-50 booking. Horrible.
[/QUOTE]Yes a monster heel can work. Yes it can happen. Anything can. But will it happen.... No. He will get fed to Cena eventually and lose all credibility.[/QUOTE]
Monsters are made to be stopped. Faces prevail in the end. That is how wrestling works.
Do you even watch WWE ? Isnt that EXACTLY what they have been doing for a year now with Roman Reigns....how is that working?
Actually it is the complete opposite of what he has been doing. Reigns should be booked as a monster. Instead he is booked to go 14 minutes with the Big Show.
During the buildup to Wrestlemania, Reigns faced Show. Reigns should have squashed him. It would have made people think "if he can do that to Big Show, imagine what he could do to Brock." Instead I think they had Show win via a distraction. Reigns is a huge guy. He has a good look. Accentuate that. Have him kill people. Have him keep his promos short until he can learn to do longer ones. Very easy. Yet they keep over-complicating it.
Also, Reigns is being cheered. Smark towns boo him.
Bret not Brett.
Yeah but who do the 8-13 year olds that make up the biggest portion of WWE audience
Wrong. The biggest demographic is actually the 18-34 (according to the data for 2014). Technically the biggest is 50+ but that includes more ages so it is a bit skewed. I have no idea where people get these "50% of the audience is under 15" crap. Stop making things up without actually looking up the numbers.