I will stand by my opinion - The Rock needs to win at WM, not John Cena. But I am sure John Cena WILL win though he has nothing to gain out of a win. It makes no sense at all for him (John Cena) to win. Though I will agree that The Rock has nothing to gain from a win, logic says he shouldn't lose (Miami, his superiority over John Cena, his epic return to one-on-one action, John Cena's whole "I will lose everything" statement, etc).
But like I said, WWE loves to do these senseless and illogical things. I know way too many of them to count. But of course, business trumps over logic anyway. Bank on a John Cena win at WM to keep today's fans satisfied.
Just so everyone knows - I have been a wrestling fan ever since the old "gimmick" days of the WWF. I grew up watching Hulk Hogan, Ric Flair, Rick Martel, and many of the "old school" guys. I have been around during the Attitude Era as well, and have watched nearly every single episode of Raw from its beginning until now.
Ah yes! The old "I've been watching wrestling for a really long time" argument. That still doesn't justify the fact that you're completly back asswards in your argument. Let me ask you something? Would it have made sense if:
The iron sheik defeated hulk hogan?
Andre the giant defeats hulk hogan at wrestlemania III?
Hulk Hogan defeats Ultimate warrior at mania 6?
Rowdy roddy piper defeats bret hart at mania 8?
I'm sure you think bret should have won the iron man match.
The montreal screwjob shouldn't have happened because it "didn't make sense" for bret to lose in front of his hometown crowd. (It wasn't even his hometown, you can't just call a whole country your hometown bret.)
On top of that I believe it would have made more sense if shawn michaels beat stone cold at wrestlemania 14. They billed it as rated X, so wouldn't it make sense if DX won both of there matches???????
Angle should have beat lesnar.
Hogan should have beat the rock.
Does all of that make sense to you? Think about it.... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IT DOOOOOEEEEEESSSSSSNNNNNN'T! So why would the rules of wrestling change just for one guy? The only way rock wins is if they're going to continue it afterwards.
Now for what I think will happen after mania 28. First off I think chris jericho will be around at least until mania 29 MAYBE 30. Just because fozzy plans on working on a new record soon, doesn't mean they're hitting the road anytime soon. If you know anything about music, you'll know that bands go through a cycle that includes writing, recording, rehearsal, then you tour for about a year, maybe two depending on how succesful. Then there's usually a 1 - 2 year chill out period. That's when we get to see chris jericho. From the time you start writing songs for a record till it gets released usually takes at least a year. So don't worry, he'll be around. Besides, he doesn't seem like he minds being away from his family that much (read his 2nd book, he lived in LA by himself for like 6 months... just saying.)
Now with that being said, I believe cena beating the rock will catipult him to number 1 contender, but rematches etc. will hinder that. I see cena feuding with Ziggler (thought he's feuded with everyone as a face?) for a little bit and maybe give him a rub. Rey will be coming back too, so I can see him and cena both fighting for the number 1 contender spot. While that is taking place Punk and Jericho will be trading the title at least once (hopefully, I know I bashed him, but jericho is one of my favs). I feel like summerslam could be either cm punk vs rey, cm punk vs ziggler, cena vs rey, rey vs jericho, or jericho vs cena. I don't think john cena and cm punk will have a match vs one another at all. They will keep trying to out do each other. One or the other will win the royal rumble. And your main event for wrestlemania 29 will be CM Punk vs John Cena(c). Where John Cena will do for CM Punk, what The Rock did the previous year for John Cena. Why? Because it makes sense. There's a free lesson for you VDogg.