Wrestlemania 9 could it of been saved?

quink987

Pre-Show Stalwart
ok as everyone knows Wrestlemania 9 has been called the shittest Wrestlemania in history but if the Main Event was Hulk Hogan vs Bret Hart like it was Planned before Hogan played his creative control card could this match of saved the PPV from being known as a lackluster PPV?

I believe it could of been because at each WM their always one match that is always remembered and this could of been that one
 
No,

The card was doomed well before that mega main event was pulled, though that match would of greatly enhanced WrestleMania 9, IF Bret had been put over which Hogan could have/should have done. The theme for the show was ******ed and the whole event messed up but had WWE not have done that they'd never have reached the sky like they did 5 years later.

Personally I would re-done the whole card from top to bottom, I would of kept Hart/Yoko as that played out for a year for the big rematch WMX, then again at the time WWE was in a transitinal time, WM8 was one of the best WM's but 9 was thin of talent, I've never actually watched WM9 only x match here and there.
 
I dont think 9 is the shittiest WrestleMania ever. It's a popular opinion, but I think it's more a case of one person saying it is and many others simply agreeing. Sure, it could have been better, but shoulda, woulda, coulda.

Michaels/Tatanka was an awesome match. Truly one of my personal favourites of all time. It's a shame that Tatanka didn't win the belt that night like he was supposed to.

The Headshrinkers vs the Steiners was also pretty good.

To be honest, I really only thought the Undertaker/Gonzales match and the very end with Hogan winning the title were the only really shitty things, but one-or-two misses arent any different to every year at WrestleMania.

I go back and watch this Mania alot. I actually preferred it over WrestleMania X (overall - not every single match).
 
This is one of the most memorable wrestlemania main events to me... bret loosing due to salt in the eye hogan coming out getting a title shot out of nowhere...with his amazing ring psychology facial expressions before and after...

I know buy rates went down to less than a third from the previous year but i didnt care about that...

Also didnt care about the togas...it was a theme...tatanka not going over on hbk changed tatankas career forever. also taker verses the giant guy in the spray tan suit is also very memorable.
 
also taker verses the giant guy in the spray tan suit is also very memorable.

Giant Gonzales :) aka Great Khali V1 but even worse lol

WrestleMania 10 was far worse IMO
WrestleMania 10 was in MSG it looked really small MSG is no good for hosting WrestleMania's it's just way too small in appearance, was fine for the first 2 Mania's since they were low budget compared to everything beyond.

shit celebrities, dark lightning, no thought, the only saving grace was Michaels vs Razor and the Bret vs Owen Hart. everything else sucked.

WrestleMania 9 was ok, not great but not shit.

obviously WWE were realing from Hogan "retiring" the previous year and making a suprise return just b4 Mania.

really though if you look at WrestleMania's they haven't lived upto there original vision for most of them, sure there's alot of stellar moments but on the whole there's more crap then there was greatness.

One could argue that WrestleMania 7-15 were awfull 16&17 were marginal and everything beyond wrestleMania 19 has been just adequate, there's always a few great matches but on the whole it's just another PPV that happens to have alot more money spent on it. which is sad. look forward to it as the one time of the year when it's on and it has dissapointed for so many years.

doesn't help that all PPV's just roll into one now, no longer is there a transition, it's just an eternal cycle of cookie cutter PPV's that are broken up by Raw and Smackdown for 3-5 weeks.
 
Wrestlemania 9 gets a lot of unfair criticism in my opinion. It wasn’t a great Mania, but it wasn’t a bad Mania either.

However, yes, the card could have been so much better.

TAG TITLE – Money Inc (c) vs The Steiner Brothers
IC TITLE – Shawn Michaels (c) vs Mr Perfect
WWE TITLE - Bret Hart (c) vs Hulk Hogan
 
ok as everyone knows Wrestlemania 9 has been called the shittest Wrestlemania in history but if the Main Event was Hulk Hogan vs Bret Hart like it was Planned before Hogan played his creative control card could this match of saved the PPV from being known as a lackluster PPV?

I believe it could of been because at each WM their always one match that is always remembered and this could of been that one
I don't really think it was Hogan and his creative, I think WWF at the time knew his contract was coming up and was trying to get him to re-sign with them.
 
Wrestlemania 9 gets a lot of unfair criticism in my opinion. It wasn’t a great Mania, but it wasn’t a bad Mania either.

However, yes, the card could have been so much better.

TAG TITLE – Money Inc (c) vs The Steiner Brothers
IC TITLE – Shawn Michaels (c) vs Mr Perfect
WWE TITLE - Bret Hart (c) vs Hulk Hogan

I believe these Title matches here would have “saved” WM IX. The fact that it was outdoors makes this one of my favorite WMs as far as the venue goes. Matches were not that bad, but they could have been better. Aside from the great match ideas rge2010 created, I might have gone with a little something different.

WWE Tag Team Title Fatal Four Way Elimination match – Money Inc. vs. Mega Maniacs vs. The Steiner Brothers vs. The Headshrinkers (with Hogan and Beefcake winning the Tag Team Gold)

Intercontinental Title Ladder match – Shawn Michaels vs. Tatanka vs. Doink the Clown vs. Crush vs. Razor Ramon vs. Bob Backlund vs. Lex Luger vs. Mr. Perfect (I know, but it would be great to see, admit it.)

WWE Title match – Bret Hart vs. Yokozuna (Bret could have still lost, Hogan could have still come out, but NO MATCH after Bret vs. Yoko, just a run-in. Imagine seeing a beat down Bret Hart being helped to the back by the new Tag Team Champions and Yokozuna standing in the ring celebrating.)
 
I think last year's mania was the worst that I've seen. I liked WM 9 overall and I thought it was cool being outside and all. Bret vs. Hogan would have been fantastic and would have made the PPV better overall. That was a dream match that we never really got to see. I've heard that Hogan didn't want to pass the torch to Bret. Taker/Gonzalez and the Hulk/Brutus tag match were the two worst on the card.
 
Intercontinental Title Ladder match – Shawn Michaels vs. Tatanka vs. Doink the Clown vs. Crush vs. Razor Ramon vs. Bob Backlund vs. Lex Luger vs. Mr. Perfect (I know, but it would be great to see, admit it.)

You think that BEFORE Michaels and Ramon introduced the ladder match to most fans--and at such a legendary level--these EIGHT guys would have put on anything but a train wreck?

I think Wrestlemania 12 was by far the worst. Much smaller card than was necessary, even with the hour+ needed for the Iron Man Match.
 
You think that BEFORE Michaels and Ramon introduced the ladder match to most fans--and at such a legendary level--these EIGHT guys would have put on anything but a train wreck?

I think Wrestlemania 12 was by far the worst. Much smaller card than was necessary, even with the hour+ needed for the Iron Man Match.

HAHA!! I know, but just picture this for a second. A Ladder match at WM IX with these 8 Superstars. It sure as hell would have made WM IX better to the point that this thread would not have been created. I’d like to see a spot where the second Doink shows up and takes the IC Title out of nowhere.
 
Don't know what kind of research the OP did but A) WM9 isn't the worst...WM11 is and B) The original plan was Bret Hart vs Ultimate Warrior for the belt at WM and the planned HOgan vs Bret was suppose to be for SS but Hogan made the deal to drop the belt to Yoko at KOTR (even though him and Bret took the tug-of-war promo shots for the SS edition of WWF Magazine)

The PPV could not have been saved because Flair left, Warrior left, and Jannetty left. It lost everyone 3 HUGE matches and gave us 3 OK matches. Imagine Flair/Perfect....Warrior/Hart......and Jannetty/HBK would of been better but nothing could of been done to keep those 3 around to save the event
 
First off I would have found a way to keep Ric Flair around a few more months and had his last match be at WrestleMania IX. He has said numerous times that his first run in WWF was one of the highlights of his career and so I doubt that this would have been very hard to pull off. And I would have made 1993 the year that all of the stars from the 80's started to pass the torch to the stars of the 90's and really put them over.

That being said the card would go like this...

WWF Championship Match
Bret Hart (c) v Yokozuna

- Yoko wins the Title in the same fashion, and when Hogan runs down the Show ends with Hogan on the receiving end of a Yoko Legdrop and the new Monster Champion standing over not one but two fallen heroes. This would build to Yoko beating Hogan at King of the Ring, and thus "passing the torch" on his way out, and to an eventual rematch with Hart at WM X.

Loser Leaves WWF Match
Hulk Hogan v Ric Flair

- Really easy story to build on; The two biggest stars of that generation, and the WWF wasn't big enough for the both of them. Hogan wins and Flair goes out on the biggest stage of them all.

Intercontinental Championship Match
Shawn Michaels (c) v Randy Savage

- The Heartbreak Kid versus the Macho Man... probably the two greatest in-ring wrestlers on their respective eras... Who wouldn't want to see this match? I'd Have this be given a pretty decent amount of time, no less than 30 minutes, with Michaels winning clean, and thus Savage "passing the torch" to Michaels.

Tag Team Championship Match
Money Inc. (c) v The Hart Foundation (Owen Hart and Jim Neidhart) w/ Jimmy Hart

- I know, Neidhart wasn't with the WWF in 1993, but I'm sure that they could have got him to come back long enough for this team to serve its purpose, getting Owen Hart over. Obviously The Hart Foundation would win the Titles, and Owen would be built until his eventual heel turn at Survivor Series. And they would be wearing the Classic Pink and Black, not the awful MC Hammer pants that they wore in '91...

Casket Match
Undertaker v Giant Gonzalez

- Gonzalez was brought in by Harvey Wippleman because the Undertaker "ruined" Kamala after the Casket Match at Survivor Series '92. What better way to have the Undertaker finish the feud with Wippleman than by putting Gonzalez AND Wippleman in the casket?

Razor Ramon v Mr. Perfect
- This would be a culmination of the feud that started just prior to Survivor Series '92. Ramon would go over.

The Headshrinkers v The Islanders
- A match built around the "Samoan Legacy" in wrestling, and who was going to carry it on. it would be a good, extremely hard hitting match to open the show. The Headshrinkers would win.
 
WM9 wasnt the shittiest WM ever it wasnt half bad!!! Money Inc should have gone against the steiners Tatanka Should have won that match and got the IC title!! That was the best match of the night and it was the opening match i believe.. I liked and will always like Yokozuna he was my favorite back then just a monster who destroyed everyone!! The thing that made it well shitty in some peoples opinion was HOGAN pulling his card.. If Hogan didnt do that and let Bret Keep the strap then it would have been a good WM not great but decent!! Hogan kinda of shittied on the PPV by doing what he did flex his creative control muscles and had to steal the spotlight
 
WM9 was not that bad at all. I was in junior high at the time and that was when wrestling was still a huge deal to me. keep in mind that this was the very first outdoor WM, and I might be the only fan that thought the commentators wearing togas was cool for the venue. I didn't really care too much for the ending, even though I was a Hulkamaniac. Looking back though, the true low points were Taker and Giant Gonzalez (El Gigante) and probably the match of Bob Backlund vs. Razor Ramon. I think that what would've made a good feud going into WM9 would be Taker Vs. Razor Ramon. Giant Gonzalez was kind of a waste on roster. Then probably push Tatanka by having him win the IC belt from Shawn clean.
 
1: Tatanka defeated Shawn Michaels (c)
2: The Steiner Brothers defeated The Headshrinkers
3: Doink the Clown defeated Crush
4: Razor Ramon defeated Bob Backlund
5: Money Inc. (c) defeated The Mega-Maniacs
6: Lex Luger defeated Mr. Perfect
7: The Undertaker defeated Giant Gonzalez
8: Yokozuna defeated Bret Hart (c)
9: Hulk Hogan defeated Yokozuna (c)

Speaking purely as a fan, Lex Luger ruined everything in 1993. 1993 Could have been awesome from start to finish. Survivor Series of 92 made Mr. Perfect the second hottest face in the company behind Bret Hart. IMO he SHOULD have won the Royal Rumble, to earn his spot against Bret Hart for the world title. It could have been a scientific wrestling match to equal Hogan vs Warrior. And of course I would have booked Perfect to win the title too.

The amount of disappointment I felt the entire year of 1993 was great, because I had become a huge mark for Mr. Perfect, Razor Ramone, and once Owen turned heel I enjoyed watching him as well. Then you set focus to guys like Yokozuna, Giant Gonzales, & Lex Luger, and ugh... Say what you want about Undertakers streak at wrestlemania, but Giant Gonzales crushed taker (and me) at WM9. There was hardly anyone at WM9 that I wanted to see win, that really did win. Hitman lost, Perfect lost, Tatanka lost, Taker might as well have lost, Crush lost (I was getting so I really liked Kona Crush at this point in time too), the only guy I liked that won was Scott Hall.

I definitely would have booked WM9 differently. I'd put Owen Hart against HBK for the IC title, let HBK win, that's fine, or if Owen won, that'd be great too IMO. Screw Luger, Giant Gonzales, & Yokozuna.

My card would have looked more like this:

1: Shawn Michaels (c) defeated The Rocket Owen Hart
2: The Mega-Maniacs defeated The Headshrinkers
3: Tatanka defeated Doink the Clown
4: Razor Ramon defeated Bob Backlund
5: The Steiner Brothers defeated Money Inc. (c) by pinfall
6: Yokozuna defeated Lex Luger
7: The Undertaker defeated Giant Gonzalez by pinfall
8: Mr. Perfect defeated Bret Hart (c)
9: Mr. Perfect (c) defeated Hulk Hogan

It might not have worked, but I sure as hell would have enjoyed it. But I'm sure if I looked at the roster more and gave it a little more thought I'd tweak a few of the matches some more. Scott Hall vs Undertaker would be good, and there's probably a different tag team I'd use to fight Brutus & Hogan, and I'd probably tweak Yoko and Luger around even more... but as I said, the card I would make would look more like what I have above, but probably different still. But I'm sold on Owen vs HBK for the IC title, the Steiners winning the titles from Money Inc, and Perfect going over Hitman & Hogan and coming out of WM9 as the WWE Champion.
 
This whole thread is nonsense because Wrestlemania IX was NOT the "shittiest" by any means. In fact it was one of the most memorable but not just for the matches, because of the commentary.

Seriously, pop in Wrestlemania IX DVD and give it a listen and tell me that Macho Man Randy Savage is not hilarious on commentary. My friends and I pop in the DVD from time to time and laugh our assess off at Macho's ridiculous remarks.

"Ride the edge of a lightning bolt and it's not the same as Wrestlemania Niiiine!" that was an actual quote.
 
I personally like Wrestlemania 9. I think WWf at that time was searching for their next superstar. I think it had some really great matches. Shawn Michaels vs Tanaka was great but hated the finish. I think that they should have something else for Hogan and let the Stieners wrestle for the Tag team championship. The Crush vs Doink match had a pretty good build and a fun feel to it I think they drop the ball one the 2 Doink storyline. Undertaker should have had another match, I think they should have had Taker vs Razor Ramoan. Because Razor match with Bob was just horrible they didn't mesh well and was just thrown together. Lex vs Mr. Perfect was a good match many would probably disagree. Could of it have been better of coarse but remeber could have been way worse.
 
Wrestlemania 9 was actually one of my favorites. One of the main things was the site. Ceasers palace, outside on a nice day, at least at the first of the event. I think the main event could have been better. I would of had it as Bret Hart, Yokozuna, and Hogan in a Triple Threat match. Have Yokozuna pin Hogan for the belt, this would be the end of hogan. Have bret face Yoko at Mania 10 for a one on one rematch for the title which Bret would win back. Lex could possibly make it a Triple Threat, taking Hogan`s place as the American Hero in the match. I think more people would have cheered for Bret still. Lex Lugar as a face, I didnt like . He gave up on the Narcissist gimmick too quick.IMO. WWF tried to make him the next Hogan put it failed big time.
 
ok as everyone knows Wrestlemania 9 has been called the shittest Wrestlemania in history but if the Main Event was Hulk Hogan vs Bret Hart like it was Planned before Hogan played his creative control card could this match of saved the PPV from being known as a lackluster PPV?

I believe it could of been because at each WM their always one match that is always remembered and this could of been that one

Ok, so you really know for a fact that Hogan played his creative control card? Can you prove this for us beyond any shadow of a doubt? Sorry man WWE produced DVDs and tell all autobiographies are not going to cut it.

Bottom line is that you CAN'T prove it...unless of course you were part of the WWF creative team back in the early 90s and were hanging around behind the scenes at Caesar's Palace that Sunday afternoon on April 4, 1993.

And no WrestleMania IX in some circles might be called the "shittiest" WrestleMania but not in all circles, it's not universally known as being the worst WrestleMania of all time so your post loses all credibility there with just that statement alone. I mean after all a better case can be made for WrestleMania 27 being a really shitty WM (with the exception of Taker vs HHH) considering that an advertised US Title Match did not occur at the event like it was SUPPOSED to. Let's also not forget other contenders for lackluster WrestleManias like VIII (but Flair vs Savage and Hart Vs Piper saves it big time I think) where the main event ended in a DQ and WrestleMania 2000 that had the biggest clusterfuck for a title match ever as well as having so many other lackluster matches...yes I know the Dudleys vs Hardys vs Edge and Christian Three-Way Ladder Match was great but the Chris Benoit vs Chris Jericho vs Kurt Angle Euro-Continental Title Match was overrated, and then take a good look at that WM and you have disappointment written over all that event. Big Bossman and Bull Buchanan vs Godfather and D'Lo Brown, The Hardcore Invitational and then of course who could forget how WM ended with Vince screwing The Rock out of the World Title in the aforementioned Fatal Four Way. Never saw Vince's umpteenth heel turn at the time ever coming! What a shocker! Say what you want about Hogan's impromptu title win against Yokozuna but it was a hell of a lot more unexpected than Vince dicking yet another wrestler out of the WWF title.

Back to focusing on WM IX though, to the best of my knowledge there was never any speculation that WM IX was going to be Hogan vs Hart, that rumor actually applies to SummerSlam 1993 and even that is an unsubstantiated rumor, again Bret might talk about it all the time and say there were photographs and press material prepared for such a match but alas I have never seen any of these "photos" surface and since we are in the reality era, I am sure something like that would surface by now. Especially when you consider that the True Story Of WrestleMania shows a lot of backstage footage that you would not have normally seen in the 90s. Therefore if the WWF was really ever serious about Bret Vs Hogan to the point where they had press material ready to distribute I think we'd probably see it by now, period.

Anyway things happened the way they did at WM IX because that's how the WWF wanted to do it. Whether I personally agree with every single booking decision of that event or Hulk Hogan's impromptu title win which I didn't, the fact is they did it. Bottom line is this all's well that ended well...Hogan lost to the monster heel that he got a controversial title win over, you know Yokozuna...and that said heel had a long title reign not seen accomplished by a heel in the (W)WWF since Superstar Graham. Bret Hart during all that time got a King Of The Ring victory and worked his way back into the World Title scene to win back the title from that monster heel he lost it to in the first place and even better it happened at the NEXT WrestleMania, which built off what happened at IX. No shit right?! Think of it the WWF actually having a WrestleMania Main Event Rematch, I am sure that was totally accidental though and this was never in the back of their minds to do.

My opinion, this was the WWF's plan all along and they stuck with it. It's just a pathetic thing to read someone like you lamenting over something you don't have all your shit together on. Granted it might not have been what you wanted or what I thought was a great way to win a title (I hate seeing impromptu title matches to be honest) but in today's era where you have concepts like Money In The Bank where someone if they have the briefcase can win the title at any time they choose to...Hogan's winning of the WWF Title was no better or worse than any other booking idea I've seen.

Bottom line is this though, the WWF in my opinion planned to make a WrestleMania ending that people would be talking about years and years later. Obviously it worked because we're having a discussion about it now, but here's a word of advice don't act like you're some expert on the inner workings of the business because you're not. Also your presumption that this is the WORST WrestleMania ever just reeks of someone who didn't put a lot of thought into their thread. If that's a condescending thing of me to say so be it...but I just had to get that out there because this is only like the thousandth discussion I've read where someone wants to bring up the whole "Hogan held WrestleMania IX hostage" BS. Just deal with it WWF wanted Hogan champion again and the payoff with Yokozuna having a monster heel title reign and Bret getting his redemption was memorable every step of the way. After all, it's not like Hogan beat Hart for the belt and Hart was not given a chance at redemption, he definitely did.

WrestleMania IX didn't need saving, the only thing that needs saving is asinine postings on this forum like ones that our fine OP has made.
 
Who Cares...It was 20 years ago...

Umm.....I'm guessing many more people than who care for your idiotic effort of a post. Stupid troll why post if you can't contribute?

Some grown ups (and youngster who are interested in old wrestling too) on this forum like talking about old wrestling. That's why there is an Old School forum here.

Plenty of forums for contemporary wrestling on this forum so f*ck off to one of them and just contribute your worthless spam there. Clueless little kid no doubt.

Now....

I really liked Wrestlemania 9, but it was mostly down to the whole presentation of it. The outdoor arena with the roman theme was awesome. The card however was not the blockbuster that I perceived the previous ones I'd watched as a young lad. Hardly any faces won and Hogan took the limelight from Bret Hart which even as a school boy I could tell it wasn't right.

I would have had Hogan and Beefcake beat Money Inc for the titles as Hogan had never been tag champ at that point.

I would have had Mr Perfect vs Shawn Michaels for the IC title with HBK retaining, but then losing to Curt in the rematch at Summerslam.

Bret would have beaten Yoko with no Hogan screwjob at the end. It really was the most disappointing part of the whole show.

The rest wasn't so bad maybe Savage vs Ramon instead of Backlund would be good as no one gave a shit about face Backlund in 1993 as far as I knew.
 
I'd just like to say that it could "HAVE" been saved, or it couldn't "HAVE" been saved. Nothing could "OF" be saved.

That aside, have to admit, I was away from the show since Wrestlemania VI. I gave up on it for a very long time as it got stale, repetitive and silly...then vulgar through the attitude era.

I think that each WM event is the culmination of the year preceding it. If you had amazing matchups, compelling storylines, etc all year long, then you'll see more of that in Wrestlemania. However, if the company is getting lazy or losing their way, it will be reflected in their biggest event just the same.

There is too much micro-managing from the top for the company to truly evolve and offer the fans great entertainment. They get it once in a while, but never consistently.
 
Could WM9 have been saved? Saved from what exactly? WM9 wasn’t as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. It may look weak compared to other manias but it wasn’t that bad of a show. The WWF did the best they could with what they had at the time.

I’ve already stated this many times but since the topic has come up again I’ll repeat myself. The WWF had a very difficult task in putting on a good mania in 1993. There was a tremendous amount of turnover in talent just since SummerSlam 92. Think back to around whom SummerSlam was built. Randy Savage, Ultimate Warrior, Ric Flair, Davey Boy Smith, and Bret Hart. Out of those five only Hart was active in the WWF by mania. Some other guys that left the WWF in 1992 or early 1993 were Roddy Piper, Jake Roberts, Big Bossman, Legion of Doom, and Natural Disasters. Guys that entered the WWF between SummerSlam 92 and WrestleMania IX were Yokozuna, Giant Gonzalez, Lex Luger, Doink, The Steiner Brothers, The Headshrinkers, Razor Ramon, and Bob Backlund. Half the roster on the WM9 card weren’t even in the WWF just eight months prior to the event. Imagine if half the guys on WM28 debuted around now. You probably wouldn’t be too excited about the card. I’d say considering the extraordinary amount of turnaround at the time the WWF did a pretty good job with WM9. Besides the only reason people complain about WM9 is because of the ending. Granted that is the most important part of the show, but if you look past that would you really say the card was so bad?
 
Could WM9 have been saved? Saved from what exactly? WM9 wasn’t as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. It may look weak compared to other manias but it wasn’t that bad of a show. The WWF did the best they could with what they had at the time.

I’ve already stated this many times but since the topic has come up again I’ll repeat myself. The WWF had a very difficult task in putting on a good mania in 1993. There was a tremendous amount of turnover in talent just since SummerSlam 92. Think back to around whom SummerSlam was built. Randy Savage, Ultimate Warrior, Ric Flair, Davey Boy Smith, and Bret Hart. Out of those five only Hart was active in the WWF by mania. Some other guys that left the WWF in 1992 or early 1993 were Roddy Piper, Jake Roberts, Big Bossman, Legion of Doom, and Natural Disasters. Guys that entered the WWF between SummerSlam 92 and WrestleMania IX were Yokozuna, Giant Gonzalez, Lex Luger, Doink, The Steiner Brothers, The Headshrinkers, Razor Ramon, and Bob Backlund. Half the roster on the WM9 card weren’t even in the WWF just eight months prior to the event. Imagine if half the guys on WM28 debuted around now. You probably wouldn’t be too excited about the card. I’d say considering the extraordinary amount of turnaround at the time the WWF did a pretty good job with WM9. Besides the only reason people complain about WM9 is because of the ending. Granted that is the most important part of the show, but if you look past that would you really say the card was so bad?

I think that's passing the buck a little too easily. I mean, you make a fair point, but at the same time, the fan favorites pretty much all lost. At the end of the day this is about giving the fans something they'll enjoy, and if you have half of your card filled with people know one knows or cares about you certainly don't have to put over all those guys that no one cares about.

All these new guys (or old guys in the case of Backlund) come in and start feuds with existing stars, and WM9 was filled almost all with exactly this kind of feud, but they didn't need to be put over the way they were. Almost all of them were heels, that's the other problem. Making all the faces lose was a very bad idea. At the time I was devastated by the Undertaker match. He was my John Cena back then, and seeing him crushed by Giant Gonzales sucked. Big deal Taker technically won, that was not the lasting impression left on me as an immature 14 year old.

This wrestlemania could have been a lot better had they shuffled things around better and done a few turns on one or more of the wrestlers. I watched the leadup closely, and debuting Lex Luger as a face, instead of the narcissist and putting him in a singles match against Hogan and then having Hogan put him over would have done wonders for Luger, and then Perfect would have been free to do what a lot of people wanted, win the royal rumble and become the #1 contender for the WWF championship.

The problem though was that WWF was convinced that the Heenan vs Perfect feud still had steam, but it really didn't.

Owen proved clear back in WM5 (when blue blazer fought Mr. Perfect) that he was ready to compete and a high level and certainly deserved #1 contender-ship for the Intercontinental title. They weren't very far at all from turning him heel to feud with Bret. Having Owen in this match would have been a very useful in that storyline, win or lose.

The matches were lackluster, and when you get right down to it, they didn't have to be at all. With the guys they had available, they could have made a much better card.
 
What happened happened. I don't blame Hogan at all because I don't even know what was going on backstage about the event. Maybe Vince just didn't have enough faith in Bret so he let Hogan win the title to send the Hulkamaniacs back home happy? None of us know. And we shouldn't be putting the blame on Hogan. I'm not a big fan of how things worked out but common, get off Hogan's dick will ya?

Now to answer the question yes, Hogan Vs Hart would've been so much better than Yokozuna Vs Hart. That match would've been a classic and stole the show but unfortunately it never happened. I used to think Yoko and Bret got buried but when you look at it, Bret lost when he Fuji cheated for Yoko and Yoko lost after he was exhausted after winning the match not expecting to wrestle Hogan. What happened happened and Hogan shouldn't be the one to blame.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top