MartialHorror
Mid-Card Championship Winner
So we of the IWC tend to think we understand the product better than the people who create it, which may or may not be true. So I was wondering, how would you guys have done things differently for the year 2014? Personally, I would've-
1) Had Ambrose defeat Rollins at 'Hell in a Cell'. Rollins more or less came out on top during all of their interactions, even when Ambrose ambushed him. Ambrose needed that win. Honestly, Ambrose keeps losing his PPV matches and his credibility has been shaken. Some fans justify this by claiming that Ambrose isn't about winning matches, but that is always what it is about. I figured Mick Foley was foreshadowing Ambrose's victory when he said that in most cases, he thought Rollins would win, but HiaC is a completely different beast. This would've protected Rollins and put Ambrose over.
2) Kept Ambrose and Bray Wyatt far away from each-other. Bray needed to rehabilitate himself and so did Ambrose. Now I feel that by putting these two together during a fragile time in both of their careers, one is destined to continue their downwards slide. I'd rather it be Bray of the two, but I would've preferred these two to meet later down the line when the feud would matter. Bray gets all this build up for his return and when he finally shows up, Ambrose promptly gets inside his head. This would've been cool if Bray hadn't already lost so much credibility since his Wrestlemania loss.
3) Have Harper retain the IC championship at TLC. WWE is telling me that the only reason he had it was because of the authority. Harper looks weak and Ziggler can't capitalize on his Survivor Series momentum because he's holding a midcarder belt. He just brought down the Authority, the biggest heel stable we've had in years...and he follows that up with the IC belt?
4) 'Orton Vs Cena' at Hell in a Cell: Cena winning was fine, but I think Rollins should've gotten involved and cost Orton the match. As it was, when Orton blamed Rollins for the curbstomp a week before, I was thinking that he was whining like a little bitch...and we're supposed to sympathize with him.
5) Lesnar should not have defeated the Undertaker. Lesnar should've come out on top, but it shouldn't have been an official win. Lesnar isn't around enough to capitalize on that heat. After conquering the streak, he should be a hated heel. Yet he vanishes, so fans start to miss him and will chant his name when he goes after Cena. I kind of wonder if Rusev would've been a better choice for WM31, as beating the Undertaker would be a much bigger deal and presumably Rusev would still be around.
6) Kane...just Kane. The last we saw of CM Punk, he was getting attacked by Kane. The last we saw of Bryan as an active wrestler, he was getting attacked by Kane. They bring back the monster heel, who through sheer coincidence, has ended the careers of two stars (in storyline) and yet...he still never wins. What killed Kane was that RAW (?) where he had the stretcher match with Cena. Losing wasn't a big deal, but they didn't even have Kane come out on top during their confrontation earlier that night.
Certain events like Batista winning the Royal Rumble actually worked out in retrospect, so the only thing I might've changed was having Batista turn heel during the Rumble so that it felt intentional. I'm split as to whether Cena going over Bray was an acceptable thing or a travesty, as Cena needed to be the top guy in order to make Brock's one-sided beatdown on him matter. There wasn't enough room for Bray at that time. Unfortunately, now WWE lacks star power, so maybe Bray should've went over.
1) Had Ambrose defeat Rollins at 'Hell in a Cell'. Rollins more or less came out on top during all of their interactions, even when Ambrose ambushed him. Ambrose needed that win. Honestly, Ambrose keeps losing his PPV matches and his credibility has been shaken. Some fans justify this by claiming that Ambrose isn't about winning matches, but that is always what it is about. I figured Mick Foley was foreshadowing Ambrose's victory when he said that in most cases, he thought Rollins would win, but HiaC is a completely different beast. This would've protected Rollins and put Ambrose over.
2) Kept Ambrose and Bray Wyatt far away from each-other. Bray needed to rehabilitate himself and so did Ambrose. Now I feel that by putting these two together during a fragile time in both of their careers, one is destined to continue their downwards slide. I'd rather it be Bray of the two, but I would've preferred these two to meet later down the line when the feud would matter. Bray gets all this build up for his return and when he finally shows up, Ambrose promptly gets inside his head. This would've been cool if Bray hadn't already lost so much credibility since his Wrestlemania loss.
3) Have Harper retain the IC championship at TLC. WWE is telling me that the only reason he had it was because of the authority. Harper looks weak and Ziggler can't capitalize on his Survivor Series momentum because he's holding a midcarder belt. He just brought down the Authority, the biggest heel stable we've had in years...and he follows that up with the IC belt?
4) 'Orton Vs Cena' at Hell in a Cell: Cena winning was fine, but I think Rollins should've gotten involved and cost Orton the match. As it was, when Orton blamed Rollins for the curbstomp a week before, I was thinking that he was whining like a little bitch...and we're supposed to sympathize with him.
5) Lesnar should not have defeated the Undertaker. Lesnar should've come out on top, but it shouldn't have been an official win. Lesnar isn't around enough to capitalize on that heat. After conquering the streak, he should be a hated heel. Yet he vanishes, so fans start to miss him and will chant his name when he goes after Cena. I kind of wonder if Rusev would've been a better choice for WM31, as beating the Undertaker would be a much bigger deal and presumably Rusev would still be around.
6) Kane...just Kane. The last we saw of CM Punk, he was getting attacked by Kane. The last we saw of Bryan as an active wrestler, he was getting attacked by Kane. They bring back the monster heel, who through sheer coincidence, has ended the careers of two stars (in storyline) and yet...he still never wins. What killed Kane was that RAW (?) where he had the stretcher match with Cena. Losing wasn't a big deal, but they didn't even have Kane come out on top during their confrontation earlier that night.
Certain events like Batista winning the Royal Rumble actually worked out in retrospect, so the only thing I might've changed was having Batista turn heel during the Rumble so that it felt intentional. I'm split as to whether Cena going over Bray was an acceptable thing or a travesty, as Cena needed to be the top guy in order to make Brock's one-sided beatdown on him matter. There wasn't enough room for Bray at that time. Unfortunately, now WWE lacks star power, so maybe Bray should've went over.