Paralyzer Z
Fuck honor
This is a topic that has torn me apart for a long time. I really do not know what the most likely scenario would have been. I always see these threads comparing back then wrestling to today's sports entertainment. There has been a significant change in the industry over the years and we went from having a bunch of Independent promotion around the country that all had a similar style of wrestling to having one big company and a bunch of Indy promotions that share a common style as opposed to the big one (WWE obviously). Different wrestling ways have developed over time and would they have worked in a time period where wrestling was almost the opposite has always been a subject of mystery to me.
Let us look at the 1980s or late 80s to be specific. Hulk Hogan was the main star, WWE/F was on the rise, and the wrestling world in general was in a boom of popularity. If there is any word to describe the one thing that almost every match anywhere you went it is "Storytelling". Now it is still the selling point of mainstream companies today, that has not changed, but not all wrestlers use it to the maximum as those back then. I take a look at all these matches that in general are very depend on formula as opposed to a variety of moves in each guy's set. This was the norm for every guy if he wanted to become a big star for Vince McMahon and his upstart giant that we know today as WWE. Then came along Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka with his famous finishing move the Superfly splash. A move that would be considered usual today was an innovation never seen before back then. He proceeded to become one of the legends in WWE history. In my opinion a majority if this can be attributed to audiences back then never having seen this type of high risk move before, and as a result cheered him for it. This would become more common later on because as with most things wrestling had begun to evolve to the next level of entertainment. Today we have the craziest most death defying moves such as the "630 splash", the double moonsault, 450 splash, hurricaranas, shooting star presses, and the lists just go on and on. However like I said before storytelling still sells most of the product, but there is another factor as to why these moves are not the centerpiece of wrestling, the audiences have previously been exposed to those kind of stunts.
If a guy like Jack Evans, or I will use a mainstream example Evan Bourne debuted in the time period where storytelling and basic wrestling were the kings and dominated all of the sport, would they have gotten over with that type of crowd? The same type of crowd who all of their life had not been exposed to unique things like high risk offense like Shooting star presses, beautiful kicks, and any flips at all. Pretend he was the first one to do this crazy stuff off of the top rope that no one else could do. Would it gain the same reaction as it does today(meaning that they have to make the audience care about them first)? Or would the awe of a new and fresh style led to a bright future in the industry for these high flyers?
The question is stated in the title but I will say it again.
Would the high flyers(or so called spot monkeys) of today have success in the late 1980s? Why?
Let us look at the 1980s or late 80s to be specific. Hulk Hogan was the main star, WWE/F was on the rise, and the wrestling world in general was in a boom of popularity. If there is any word to describe the one thing that almost every match anywhere you went it is "Storytelling". Now it is still the selling point of mainstream companies today, that has not changed, but not all wrestlers use it to the maximum as those back then. I take a look at all these matches that in general are very depend on formula as opposed to a variety of moves in each guy's set. This was the norm for every guy if he wanted to become a big star for Vince McMahon and his upstart giant that we know today as WWE. Then came along Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka with his famous finishing move the Superfly splash. A move that would be considered usual today was an innovation never seen before back then. He proceeded to become one of the legends in WWE history. In my opinion a majority if this can be attributed to audiences back then never having seen this type of high risk move before, and as a result cheered him for it. This would become more common later on because as with most things wrestling had begun to evolve to the next level of entertainment. Today we have the craziest most death defying moves such as the "630 splash", the double moonsault, 450 splash, hurricaranas, shooting star presses, and the lists just go on and on. However like I said before storytelling still sells most of the product, but there is another factor as to why these moves are not the centerpiece of wrestling, the audiences have previously been exposed to those kind of stunts.
If a guy like Jack Evans, or I will use a mainstream example Evan Bourne debuted in the time period where storytelling and basic wrestling were the kings and dominated all of the sport, would they have gotten over with that type of crowd? The same type of crowd who all of their life had not been exposed to unique things like high risk offense like Shooting star presses, beautiful kicks, and any flips at all. Pretend he was the first one to do this crazy stuff off of the top rope that no one else could do. Would it gain the same reaction as it does today(meaning that they have to make the audience care about them first)? Or would the awe of a new and fresh style led to a bright future in the industry for these high flyers?
The question is stated in the title but I will say it again.
Would the high flyers(or so called spot monkeys) of today have success in the late 1980s? Why?