It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
Though yes, this is stemmed from a dirt sheet report about the WWE's seeming unwillingness to utilize the legendary Jim Ross on television anymore (or at least in the near future), as well as the WWE's locker room reaction to the news, I do think this offers a unique perspective/opportunity for a debate over how much value Ross really has in the industry, and whether or not a transition to TNA could conceivably be in his future.
No one can question the man's history, obviously, as he's truly cut his teeth from his days with Mid-South in the late 80's all the way through to today, but it's become quite obvious that the WWE has either moved on, or is moving on without him, and that's a tragedy if there ever was one seeing as JR has become an absolute vocal staple in the wrestling world for the last decade plus. He can lay claim to numerous "oh my god" moments over the last fifteen years including the infamous Mankind/Undertaker mega-bump from King of the Ring '98, to any number of the Austin infamies from the 90's on and more.
The question really becomes, would Ross' history in the business be an asset for TNA, or would it be conceived as yet another "WWE Reject" moment and ultimately shine a dull light on Ross' infamous career in a way perhaps it did for Booker T?
Is Ross better off remaining off screen working for the WWE in a backstage role, or is he better suited doing what he can to continue his career in TNA, perhaps working the announcing table with Tenay & Taz?
Is the option for TNA a viable one, and if it is, do you consider Ross a valuable asset, or would the mark of the WWE be too strong in his history to allow the transition to matter?
No one can question the man's history, obviously, as he's truly cut his teeth from his days with Mid-South in the late 80's all the way through to today, but it's become quite obvious that the WWE has either moved on, or is moving on without him, and that's a tragedy if there ever was one seeing as JR has become an absolute vocal staple in the wrestling world for the last decade plus. He can lay claim to numerous "oh my god" moments over the last fifteen years including the infamous Mankind/Undertaker mega-bump from King of the Ring '98, to any number of the Austin infamies from the 90's on and more.
The question really becomes, would Ross' history in the business be an asset for TNA, or would it be conceived as yet another "WWE Reject" moment and ultimately shine a dull light on Ross' infamous career in a way perhaps it did for Booker T?
Is Ross better off remaining off screen working for the WWE in a backstage role, or is he better suited doing what he can to continue his career in TNA, perhaps working the announcing table with Tenay & Taz?
Is the option for TNA a viable one, and if it is, do you consider Ross a valuable asset, or would the mark of the WWE be too strong in his history to allow the transition to matter?