Will FTS now love Angelina Jolie?

[jmt225]

Let's find out.

This came out today about Angelina's thoughts on Obama:

“She hates him,” a source close to Jolie tells Us Weekly.
”She’s into education and rehabilitation and thinks Obama is all about welfare and handouts. She thinks Obama is really a socialist in disguise,” adds the source.
But don’t expect to see her rally against Democrats on Fox News like her Republican father, Jon Voight.

“Angie isn’t Republican, but she thinks Obama is all smoke and mirrors,” the source says.

If that's not enough to make you love her, FTS, then here:

You know you'd hop in that bed faster than a... well, something really fast.

 

[X]

I don't get why people are always hating on her for adopting impoverished children, as though that's a bad thing in any way.

 

[Moon Knight]

:Vomit:

 

[FromTheSouth]

It's not that she adopts impoverished children, it's just that there are plenty in America to adopt.

And, yeah, I'd hit it, but I still don't think she's that attractive. I bet she is a great lay though.

 

[X]

It's not that she adopts impoverished children, it's just that there are plenty in America to adopt.

Yeah, and those plenty of American children in those adoption homes are 10,000 times better off than an orphan in Nigeria. Atleast an American orphan has chances to get adopted and a system to atleast feed and clothe them if they can't find parents, whereas in the countries Jolie adopts children from, it's basically thousands of children roaming the streets and eating garbage trying to figure out how to feed their little brothers and sisters.

 

[gd]

US Weekly is reliable

 

[Cena's Little Helper]

US Weekly is reliable

It has nothing on The National Enquirer.

 

[FromTheSouth]

Yeah, and those plenty of American children in those adoption homes are 10,000 times better off than an orphan in Nigeria. Atleast an American orphan has chances to get adopted and a system to atleast feed and clothe them if they can't find parents, whereas in the countries Jolie adopts children from, it's basically thousands of children roaming the streets and eating garbage trying to figure out how to feed their little brothers and sisters.

So give the millions she would spend on one of them to build a shelter and run an orphanage.

She should be more like Oprah and help the general populace than plucking one child while the others live in squalor.

 

[klunderbunker]

Yeah I don't have an issue with her adopting foreign kids if she wants to, but like someone said, why not American kids?

 

[gd]

It has nothing on The National Enquirer.

The article about the half alligator/half man that was seen drinking budweiser in the swamps and planned on running for Congress was a great piece.

 

[X]

Yeah I don't have an issue with her adopting foreign kids if she wants to, but like someone said, why not American kids?

Because American orphans have it SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better than orphans from third world countries KB, that's why. Why is this concept so hard for people to get? There's atleast a SYSTEM here for these children, whereas these other countries it's just homeless children starving to death on the side of the road, being turned into child soldiers, or being sold into sex slavery. That's why.

 

[klunderbunker]

Because at some point, it needs to be about America and not every other country. We bend over fucking backwards to help every other country and people here are forgotten more and more.

 

[FromTheSouth]

So the fuck what if they have it better? It's still not good. -1 is more positive than -3, but it's still not positive. Furthermore, the kids she adpots come from families. She rips the kids from families, however loosely that term can be defined.

 

[X]

Because at some point, it needs to be about America and not every other country. We bend over fucking backwards to help every other country and people here are forgotten more and more.

Oh okay, so if you see an American with a papercut, and an African with a sawed off arm, we should go and care for the papercut?

 

[FromTheSouth]

Because at some point, it needs to be about America and not every other country. We bend over fucking backwards to help every other country and people here are forgotten more and more.

Like the 400 billion a year that goes to Africa instead of feeding the homeless and destitute here. You want to end the wars to pay for national healthcare......

 

[gd]

Not sure about the adoption thing, but as a whole, American needs to care more about themselves than other countries. Why should we be spending millions of millions of dollars to set up democracy in Iraq when we have so many problems?

 

[klunderbunker]

No, I see a family that wants to adopt two kids and there are two Americans and two African kids with no parents, take one of each, not both African kids. Why should we have to take care of other countries all the time? If we just hold them up all the time, what incentive do they have to get better?

 

[X]

Yeah, why pay to help people who have it so, so much worse than us when we should take care of ourselves! The US should've just let the holocaust happen since hey, they weren't Americans, why should we care? We've got Pearl Harbor to rebuild!

 

[FromTheSouth]

Oh okay, so if you see an American with a papercut, and an African with a sawed off arm, we should go and care for the papercut?

Yes. Because fixing the American papercut is an actual solution to the problem, whereas fixing the sawed off arm only provides more time for the warlords that lead those countries to rap 100 more women. We don't fix shit in Africa. All we do is throw money at the wrong problems and try to feel better about ourselves. We don't do shit for those people. We would do far more good with money here at home.

 

[klunderbunker]

Like the 400 billion a year that goes to Africa instead of feeding the homeless and destitute here. You want to end the wars to pay for national healthcare......

There's a big difference between paying for troops and paying for food/medicine for a country. If we were sending food/medicine/humanitarian relief to Afghanistan/Iraq you wouldn't hear nearly as much complaining from me.

 

[FromTheSouth]

Yeah, why pay to help people who have it so, so much worse than us when we should take care of ourselves! The US should've just let the holocaust happen since hey, they weren't Americans, why should we care? We've got Pearl Harbor to rebuild!

Americans didn't want to go to war in Europe.

But, how dare you fucking use the Holocaust to justify something to me. Do you not fucking think I understand the event? That is a weak bullshit argument.

We get it. You hate America.

 

[FromTheSouth]

There's a big difference between paying for troops and paying for food/medicine for a country. If we were sending food/medicine/humanitarian relief to Afghanistan/Iraq you wouldn't hear nearly as much complaining from me.

But all we do is feed the warlords. Most of that food and medicine doesn't get to the people. We might as well be raping the women ourselves for all the "good" we do.

 

[X]

Americans didn't want to go to war in Europe.

And you don't want to help starving children in Africa. Good thing we went to war in Europe and didn't listen to the people though, huh?

But, how dare you fucking use the Holocaust to justify something to me. Do you not fucking think I understand the event? That is a weak bullshit argument.

How is it a bullshit argument? Because I paralleled a historical event you do care about to one that you don't to try and make you look at the issue from a different perspective?

How dare I bring up the Holocaust? It was a fucking historical event, what do you mean?

We get it. You hate America.

Yeah, because clearly I said that.

 

[klunderbunker]

Yes, but some of it does. It's better than sitting back and doing nothing, or at least that's what we're told because if we didn't the international community jumps down our throats, and that would be a TERRIBLE thing right. I mean, what's worse than other people glaring at you? WE CANNOT ALLOW THAT!!!

 

[FromTheSouth]

And you don't want to help starving children in Africa. Good thing we went to war in Europe and didn't listen to the people though, huh?

We're not helping starving children in Africa. We're giving money to warloards. Bonus points for trying to pull on my heartstrings.

How is it a bullshit argument? Because I paralleled a historical event you do care about to one that you don't to try and make you look at the issue from a different perspective?

But the analogy was weak. We could do something in Europe, we choose to do nothing of consequence in Africa. What we need to do is oust the warlards and cannibals that run the continent.

How dare I bring up the Holocaust? It was a fucking historical event, what do you mean?

You're right. Why give money to Africa when we could put it all in the Matthew Shepard memorial fund.

Yeah, because clearly I said that.

In a thousand different ways in a hundred different posts.