Will FTS now love Angelina Jolie?
- Thread starter jmt225
- Start date
Moon Knight
Original Prince of Darkness
:Vomit:
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
It's not that she adopts impoverished children, it's just that there are plenty in America to adopt.
And, yeah, I'd hit it, but I still don't think she's that attractive. I bet she is a great lay though.
And, yeah, I'd hit it, but I still don't think she's that attractive. I bet she is a great lay though.
Yeah, and those plenty of American children in those adoption homes are 10,000 times better off than an orphan in Nigeria. Atleast an American orphan has chances to get adopted and a system to atleast feed and clothe them if they can't find parents, whereas in the countries Jolie adopts children from, it's basically thousands of children roaming the streets and eating garbage trying to figure out how to feed their little brothers and sisters.
Cena's Little Helper
Mid-Card Championship Winner
It has nothing on The National Enquirer.
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
So give the millions she would spend on one of them to build a shelter and run an orphanage.
She should be more like Oprah and help the general populace than plucking one child while the others live in squalor.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Yeah I don't have an issue with her adopting foreign kids if she wants to, but like someone said, why not American kids?
Because American orphans have it SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better than orphans from third world countries KB, that's why. Why is this concept so hard for people to get? There's atleast a SYSTEM here for these children, whereas these other countries it's just homeless children starving to death on the side of the road, being turned into child soldiers, or being sold into sex slavery. That's why.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Because at some point, it needs to be about America and not every other country. We bend over fucking backwards to help every other country and people here are forgotten more and more.
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
So the fuck what if they have it better? It's still not good. -1 is more positive than -3, but it's still not positive. Furthermore, the kids she adpots come from families. She rips the kids from families, however loosely that term can be defined.
Oh okay, so if you see an American with a papercut, and an African with a sawed off arm, we should go and care for the papercut?
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
Like the 400 billion a year that goes to Africa instead of feeding the homeless and destitute here. You want to end the wars to pay for national healthcare......
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
No, I see a family that wants to adopt two kids and there are two Americans and two African kids with no parents, take one of each, not both African kids. Why should we have to take care of other countries all the time? If we just hold them up all the time, what incentive do they have to get better?
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
Yes. Because fixing the American papercut is an actual solution to the problem, whereas fixing the sawed off arm only provides more time for the warlords that lead those countries to rap 100 more women. We don't fix shit in Africa. All we do is throw money at the wrong problems and try to feel better about ourselves. We don't do shit for those people. We would do far more good with money here at home.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
Americans didn't want to go to war in Europe.
But, how dare you fucking use the Holocaust to justify something to me. Do you not fucking think I understand the event? That is a weak bullshit argument.
We get it. You hate America.
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
But all we do is feed the warlords. Most of that food and medicine doesn't get to the people. We might as well be raping the women ourselves for all the "good" we do.
And you don't want to help starving children in Africa. Good thing we went to war in Europe and didn't listen to the people though, huh?
How is it a bullshit argument? Because I paralleled a historical event you do care about to one that you don't to try and make you look at the issue from a different perspective?
How dare I bring up the Holocaust? It was a fucking historical event, what do you mean?
Yeah, because clearly I said that.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Yes, but some of it does. It's better than sitting back and doing nothing, or at least that's what we're told because if we didn't the international community jumps down our throats, and that would be a TERRIBLE thing right. I mean, what's worse than other people glaring at you? WE CANNOT ALLOW THAT!!!
FromTheSouth
You don't want it with me.
We're not helping starving children in Africa. We're giving money to warloards. Bonus points for trying to pull on my heartstrings.
But the analogy was weak. We could do something in Europe, we choose to do nothing of consequence in Africa. What we need to do is oust the warlards and cannibals that run the continent.
You're right. Why give money to Africa when we could put it all in the Matthew Shepard memorial fund.
Yeah, because clearly I said that.
In a thousand different ways in a hundred different posts.
