I haven't been on here in a while and maybe this has already been addressed, but I didn't think you could hold two singles titles at the same time. I know you can hold a singles title and a tag title.
As soon as the possibility for Rollins to win came up, I immediately thought of my childhood, when the Ultimate Warrior defeated Hogan for the WWF Championship while holding the Intercontinental Championship. I remember Warrior had to vacate the IC because he held the WWF Championship. If I remember correctly, they even held a tournament for it.
Now, I get it that the "rules" of wrestling change and it's not real, but when did this change become permissible? I can't say that I've heard anything on TV that states the rules allow Rollins to hold both and I definitely haven't heard anything stating that he has to vacate one.
Personally, I like that he can hold both titles. I guess I was curious why they never invoked the old "WWF rule" that you can't hold two singles titles.
And as far as I know, no one else as done this in the WWE since Warrior did this back at Wrestlemania VI. Someone could correct me on this though. I know it has happened in other federations, but not WWE as far as I can tell. Granted it would be at least a 25 year old rule now, but the WWE has always found it convenient to forget rules or other history to make the way for new storylines.
Has anyone else heard this rule, or lack thereof, addressed in any way with the WWE?
As soon as the possibility for Rollins to win came up, I immediately thought of my childhood, when the Ultimate Warrior defeated Hogan for the WWF Championship while holding the Intercontinental Championship. I remember Warrior had to vacate the IC because he held the WWF Championship. If I remember correctly, they even held a tournament for it.
Now, I get it that the "rules" of wrestling change and it's not real, but when did this change become permissible? I can't say that I've heard anything on TV that states the rules allow Rollins to hold both and I definitely haven't heard anything stating that he has to vacate one.
Personally, I like that he can hold both titles. I guess I was curious why they never invoked the old "WWF rule" that you can't hold two singles titles.
And as far as I know, no one else as done this in the WWE since Warrior did this back at Wrestlemania VI. Someone could correct me on this though. I know it has happened in other federations, but not WWE as far as I can tell. Granted it would be at least a 25 year old rule now, but the WWE has always found it convenient to forget rules or other history to make the way for new storylines.
Has anyone else heard this rule, or lack thereof, addressed in any way with the WWE?