Who's the better pure wrestler: Bryan or Cesaro? | WrestleZone Forums

Who's the better pure wrestler: Bryan or Cesaro?

Who's the better wrestler?

  • Daniel Bryan

  • Cesaro


Results are only viewable after voting.
Really!?! Daniel Bryan, hands down. Not to take anything away from Cesaro but all you have to do is compare their bodies of work over the years and Bryan comes out way ahead. At least as far as being a "pure" wrestler. Bryan probably has more skill and experience in puroresu than anyone working in the US.
 
I know everyone will say daniel bryan.

But if you go back and watch some of cesaro matches the choice becomes less obvious to me one of the best if not the best wrestler is austin aries. Yet he doesn't have the spotlight as daniel bryan so people are less likely to say aries is better than bryan when bryan is main eventing the world's biggest wrestling company.

That's how i see Cesaro it's unfair to place them together at this point cause cesaro is just now being thought of as a top guy, last year at this time cesaro was a nobody and 100 percent would have said daniel bryan. now i think it will be 80 percent daniel bryan and 20 percent cesaro.

If cesaro becomes a huge star it will then split 50/50 and cesaro may end up being known as a better wrestler, i personally say cesaro is better than bryan he sure is alot more entertaining in my opinion, and he's moves are better.

Take Cm Punk for example he was never known as the best wrestler in the world, till he got the proper spotlight and then he was huge but i took him awhile to get that far, truth be told punk really didn't improve much he was always a great wrestler people just don't realize it until wwe lets them have the spotlight enough to pull off great matches and feuds.

Ask this again In September And i think Cesaro has a good chance of at least comming close of beating bryan, but at this point not many people has seen many matches of cesaro so of course they will say bryan.
 
Ask this again In September And i think Cesaro has a good chance of at least comming close of beating bryan, but at this point not many people has seen many matches of cesaro so of course they will say bryan.


I agree with this. It is too early in Cesaro's WWE exposure career to compare Bryan to him. Many people haven't seen Cesaro compete outside of WWE, and are just now getting a real taste of what he can do. The same could be said for Bryan before he came to WWE in 2010. Looking at Bryan then compared to Bryan today in WWE, he has come a long way in showing people his skills. With time, Cezaro will be there as well, as more people realize just exactly how talented he really is. A comparison between them now is a little one sided, simply because Bryan has had more national exposure than Cesaro has.
 
A year ago I would have said Bryan but Cesaro has become possibly the best rounded wrestler in the business, period. He is great at pretty much everything and exceptional in the rest. Bryan is great, he had a run as the best wrestler in the world for the past five years at least, but Cesaro is a new kind of beast.
 
While Cesaro's technique is good, better than most in the WWE currently, nobody in the world can touch Daniel Bryan(in my mind) besides maybe Hiroshi Tanahashi. Daniel Bryan/Bryan Danielson has won the PWI award for best technical wrestler, every single year since like 2005, which was obviously way before he was even in WWE. I believe and PWI agrees with me, that Daniel Bryan has been the best technical wrestler in the world for some time now, Cesaro needs more exposure and some time to be comparable to Daniel Bryan.
 
I agree with Daniel Bryan though Cesaro is impressive. Can you guys imagine a Daniel Bryan vs Sean Michaels (in his prime) Match? I would still love to see Bryan vs Jericho. I do believe one day we will see Bryan vs Cesaro.
 
I agree with Daniel Bryan though Cesaro is impressive. Can you guys imagine a Daniel Bryan vs Sean Michaels (in his prime) Match? I would still love to see Bryan vs Jericho. I do believe one day we will see Bryan vs Cesaro.

That match is on YouTube pal. It happened in 2010.

As for Bryan or Cesaro, Cesaro has vastly superior strength, but Bryan eclipses him in every other category. Cesaro is very agile for a man his size, though.
 
As great as Daniel Bryan is, his work is comparable to Chris Benoit's. He goes entirely too fast in the ring and should slow down the pace a little to give maximum effect to the crowd.

I'd have to say Cesaro is the better of the two for a few reasons. First, he has a unique style I have not seen anywhere. His work is very realistic looking and his strength is amazing for a guy his size. Especially when bigger guys like Big Show and Mark Henry can't do half the amazing things that Cesaro has done. Also, his timing is great because he knows what to do and when to do it. That is rare with the current generation of stars and most have no grasp of timing or psychology. He can work with any opponent and manages to have great matches with them all. Bryan has elements of all these things too but Cesaro is better in my view.
 
Bryan is a better wrestler but I'm thinking Cesaro is is more well rounded with his feats of strength. Don't know if Cesaro would ever be as over as Bryan is now, but a few years back I'd wouldn't have believed Bryan would be as over as he is currently so anything can happen in that respect.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top