It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
Kurt Angle is 44. Rob Van Dam is 41. Devon is 40. Bully Ray is 41. Sting is 53. Hernandez is 39.
When you move down a rung on the totem pole, Jeff Hardy is 35. Austin Aries is 34. Bobby Roode is 35. James Storm is 35. Matt Morgan is 35. AJ Styles is 35. Mr. Anderson is 36.
The list goes on, and it's rather top heavy in guys on the "wrong" side of 35, or rapidly approaching that mark. I use 35 as the marker because across the majority of professional sports that is the age marker in almost every professional league where retirement becomes a very real threat/reality, so why should pro-wrestling be any different? A lot of these guys are probably in worse shape at the age of 25 than an NHL defenseman might be at 35, for example.
But my point is, TNA is banking a ton of their success, and subsequently their future, in older performers who have much clearer, much more visible expiration dates. That's not to say that these performers dont' have value. Just the opposite, in fact, but factoring in their actual age, can they really be considered the "future" of TNA? I could buy an argument for guys like Aries, Storm, Roode and even Morgan despite being near or on the wrong side of 35, but at some point it seems pertinent to put a little more stock in a few more young guns (no pun intended), no?
As far as I'm concerned they have a really nice starting point with a guy like Kenny King (31) and especially Magnus (who's just 26), but when you look up and down the TNA roster it's glaringly devoid of much "young" talent at all. While I'm sure the guys at or near 35 are still likely to have a number of years more to their careers, again, to me it's important to start trying to find a bit more by means of talent young enough to build on for the future.
Aside from guys like Magnus and King, do you see any real potential stars currently on the TNA roster? If so, who, and why, and if not, who do you think TNA should be targeting as potential stars moving forward?
When you move down a rung on the totem pole, Jeff Hardy is 35. Austin Aries is 34. Bobby Roode is 35. James Storm is 35. Matt Morgan is 35. AJ Styles is 35. Mr. Anderson is 36.
The list goes on, and it's rather top heavy in guys on the "wrong" side of 35, or rapidly approaching that mark. I use 35 as the marker because across the majority of professional sports that is the age marker in almost every professional league where retirement becomes a very real threat/reality, so why should pro-wrestling be any different? A lot of these guys are probably in worse shape at the age of 25 than an NHL defenseman might be at 35, for example.
But my point is, TNA is banking a ton of their success, and subsequently their future, in older performers who have much clearer, much more visible expiration dates. That's not to say that these performers dont' have value. Just the opposite, in fact, but factoring in their actual age, can they really be considered the "future" of TNA? I could buy an argument for guys like Aries, Storm, Roode and even Morgan despite being near or on the wrong side of 35, but at some point it seems pertinent to put a little more stock in a few more young guns (no pun intended), no?
As far as I'm concerned they have a really nice starting point with a guy like Kenny King (31) and especially Magnus (who's just 26), but when you look up and down the TNA roster it's glaringly devoid of much "young" talent at all. While I'm sure the guys at or near 35 are still likely to have a number of years more to their careers, again, to me it's important to start trying to find a bit more by means of talent young enough to build on for the future.
Aside from guys like Magnus and King, do you see any real potential stars currently on the TNA roster? If so, who, and why, and if not, who do you think TNA should be targeting as potential stars moving forward?