Between 1996-1999, wcw had a division by the name of crusierweights. Which constantly during that period of time had stellar 5 star matches, and superb performers, names like ultimo dragon, rey mysterio, juventud, psicosis, billy kidman, as well as others, well constantly stealing the show(besides the nwo).
However............
During the second half of 1999, the crusierweight title just went downhill from then on and had no real interest in this fan here, it was no longer relevant or important, so i beg the question.
WHAT/WHO TARNISHED THE CRUSIERWEIGHT TITLE LEGACY?
I have listed my own reason below..........
1. disco inferno: the minute he beat psicosis for the belt in the second half of 99, it was the start of the belt meaning nothing anymore, therefore, becoming a joke, he hardly defended it, he was more of a brawler than a high flyer, and it was the first time a holder of this particular belt did nothing for it.
2. madusa: well, this was just bad, when she beat evan karagias for the belt at starcade, i knew it was bad, seriously?, a whiny skinny woman beating, a man(who was a decent wrestler), for the crusier belt, pathetic!
3. oklahoma: for those of you who don't know, he is ed ferrara, vince russo's right hand man, as oklahoma, he was a fat out of shape, rude, non wrestler, who was a tasteless parody of legendary wrestling commentator jim ross, who did not look like he could beat anybody.
The match between him and madusa, at souled out 2000 was the worst disgrace involving the crusierweight belt ever, what was worst was he would beat madusa for it, and then retire it the next night,(prince ieakia would go on to win a tournament to win it).
4. bringing it to wwe: this really did destroy the legacy of the title, wwe did not treat the title as well as wcw did, with sub -par matches, and non existent feuds,(and they did not have the athletes that wcw had to cover up poor feuds,by having great matches), they even have hornswoogle listed as the last holder of the crusierweight title, how tasteless.
well there are my opinions, agree, disagree, or add your own, thoughts.
However............
During the second half of 1999, the crusierweight title just went downhill from then on and had no real interest in this fan here, it was no longer relevant or important, so i beg the question.
WHAT/WHO TARNISHED THE CRUSIERWEIGHT TITLE LEGACY?
I have listed my own reason below..........
1. disco inferno: the minute he beat psicosis for the belt in the second half of 99, it was the start of the belt meaning nothing anymore, therefore, becoming a joke, he hardly defended it, he was more of a brawler than a high flyer, and it was the first time a holder of this particular belt did nothing for it.
2. madusa: well, this was just bad, when she beat evan karagias for the belt at starcade, i knew it was bad, seriously?, a whiny skinny woman beating, a man(who was a decent wrestler), for the crusier belt, pathetic!
3. oklahoma: for those of you who don't know, he is ed ferrara, vince russo's right hand man, as oklahoma, he was a fat out of shape, rude, non wrestler, who was a tasteless parody of legendary wrestling commentator jim ross, who did not look like he could beat anybody.
The match between him and madusa, at souled out 2000 was the worst disgrace involving the crusierweight belt ever, what was worst was he would beat madusa for it, and then retire it the next night,(prince ieakia would go on to win a tournament to win it).
4. bringing it to wwe: this really did destroy the legacy of the title, wwe did not treat the title as well as wcw did, with sub -par matches, and non existent feuds,(and they did not have the athletes that wcw had to cover up poor feuds,by having great matches), they even have hornswoogle listed as the last holder of the crusierweight title, how tasteless.
well there are my opinions, agree, disagree, or add your own, thoughts.