When I ask that question I'm not doing it as a smartass because the angle sucked so badly (even though it did). I really am wondering what was the point. Here's the quick history lesson.
As we all know during the spring of 1996 Razor Ramon and Diesel jumped from the WWF to WCW. It was heavily implied that they were representing the WWF in a real cross promotion war against WCW. WCW purposely avoided addressing them by name as they obviously could not use the WWF trademarks. Eventually the WWF sued WCW and WCW had to come forward saying Razor and Diesel did not work for the WWF and were now going by their real names Scott Hall and Kevin Nash.
A couple months later Jim Ross announced Razor Ramon and Diesel would be retuning to the WWF. This caused mass confusion as Hall and Nash were freshly signed to WCW and involved in the biggest angle in wrestling in years. Well Razor and Diesel did return but Hall and Nash did not. Two relatively unknown wrestlers were brought in to take over the roles of Razor and Diesel. Ross never said Hall and Nash were coming back and that the two new guys had the right to use those names. Many viewed this as an act of desperation and the fans immediately hated the angle.
What do you think the actual point of this angle was? You don't think they actually thought they could just transfer the characters to different wrestlers and pick up where they left off do you? Surely the WWF knew the fans would not accept two other wrestlers playing the roles of Razor and Diesel. Knowing the fans wouldn't accept them were they trying to make two new big heels? They were hated but not in the good way. Were they just trying to stick it to WCW showing them they couldn't have their characters? That didn't matter at all. Was it just a desperate publicity stunt done to attract viewers to Raw for the night of the return and hope to score a bigger rating for at least one week? The WWF had to know the fans would view this as a bait and switch and flip over to see the real thing instead of two lame imposters.
A lot of times we take something we didn't like and ask what the point was. Most of the time we can at least rationalize an objective even if it failed in execution. Whether it be from a kayfabe point of view or a real one we can usually find an answer to our rhetorical question. This time I really am wondering what the point was. What do you think the creative meetings were like as this angle was being discussed? What was the end goal here?
As we all know during the spring of 1996 Razor Ramon and Diesel jumped from the WWF to WCW. It was heavily implied that they were representing the WWF in a real cross promotion war against WCW. WCW purposely avoided addressing them by name as they obviously could not use the WWF trademarks. Eventually the WWF sued WCW and WCW had to come forward saying Razor and Diesel did not work for the WWF and were now going by their real names Scott Hall and Kevin Nash.
A couple months later Jim Ross announced Razor Ramon and Diesel would be retuning to the WWF. This caused mass confusion as Hall and Nash were freshly signed to WCW and involved in the biggest angle in wrestling in years. Well Razor and Diesel did return but Hall and Nash did not. Two relatively unknown wrestlers were brought in to take over the roles of Razor and Diesel. Ross never said Hall and Nash were coming back and that the two new guys had the right to use those names. Many viewed this as an act of desperation and the fans immediately hated the angle.
What do you think the actual point of this angle was? You don't think they actually thought they could just transfer the characters to different wrestlers and pick up where they left off do you? Surely the WWF knew the fans would not accept two other wrestlers playing the roles of Razor and Diesel. Knowing the fans wouldn't accept them were they trying to make two new big heels? They were hated but not in the good way. Were they just trying to stick it to WCW showing them they couldn't have their characters? That didn't matter at all. Was it just a desperate publicity stunt done to attract viewers to Raw for the night of the return and hope to score a bigger rating for at least one week? The WWF had to know the fans would view this as a bait and switch and flip over to see the real thing instead of two lame imposters.
A lot of times we take something we didn't like and ask what the point was. Most of the time we can at least rationalize an objective even if it failed in execution. Whether it be from a kayfabe point of view or a real one we can usually find an answer to our rhetorical question. This time I really am wondering what the point was. What do you think the creative meetings were like as this angle was being discussed? What was the end goal here?