What should the next Wrestlezone Forums editorial be on?

[The 1-2-3 Killam]

As I said - and as MANY people requested - there will be more Wrestlezone editorials to come in the (near) future. With about 14 people submitting pieces, and many more interested in the next go-around, this could be a fairly successful and frequent feature for the main page.

Round 2 will obviously take place in the month of December, which leaves us open to all kinds of "Best of 2012" or "Worst of 2012" options. Unless somebody else has a better idea, I'd like to come up with something along those lines. So let's hear what you've got.

 

[Uncle Sam]

Works for me. I can finally say what I really think about Jeff Hardy.

I don't like him very much.

 

[IHW]

Best Of/Worst Of 2012 sounds good to me. Each entry can state one best and one worse.

Will each article feature 2 parts with 5 entry's each? Or is it going to change?

 

[Alex]

Works for me. I can finally say what I really think about Jeff Hardy.

I don't like him very much.

What would be good is the pros and cons he brings to the business

 

[Uncle Sam]

Pros:
Easy target
Less drugs for children to have
More humility for everyone else to have
Makes everyone else feel like less of a cunt

 

[Steamboat Ricky]

I was thinking the other day, reading Mark Madden's editorial: would Steve Austin really have worked without the nWo? That might get a lot of activity going on the board, particularly with high attention being paid to Attitude by WWE in the present.