I'm ah keep it real with you man.
Would it kill you to type "I'm going to tell you what I honestly think, man?" Like a decent human being?
If the tables were turned so to speak. I think that WCW would have f--ked it up anyways man. Too much talent to maintain.
If the WcW had the money in 2001 to buy the WWF, that would mean they didn't fuck up extreamly bad in 1998, so I'd say the could have done decent.
I don't even think that the Undertaker would have signed with WCW anyway ether. He had too much loyalty to Vince Mcmahon.
I disagree. He had a job to keep, and food to keep on the table.
Push come to shove, he probraly would have walked. Like the radicals (Benoit, Guerrero, Malenko, & Saturn) did in WCW.
Beniot was in the WWE the day he died. Guerrero was too. Saturn joined the WWE from 2000-2002, but couldn't cut it. Malenko was in the WWE from 2000-2001, and couldn't cut it. All of these "radicals" went into the WWE.
bigfan0508 said:
I'm sorry, but that wouldn't have lasted.
If they had the money to buy out the WWF in 2001, they would have lasted.
WCW was horrible in the end. Way too gimmicky. They would have imploded had WCW bought out the WWF.
They didn't have the money to buy out the WWF in the first place, once again if they actually had the money, Vince would have sold his product for about 3x its actual worth. They would have made it. But WcW was doing so badly, it had to sell out, for much lower than its actual price, I'm assuming.
However, I could see Vince coming back with a new WWE lol.
I'm sure there would be extra precautions in the contract, assuring the WcW that Vince would NEVER own a wrestling product again. Or at least for a decade or so.
To answer some of your questions though, they would have used the Royal Rumble, and maybe SummerSlam or Survivor Series. No need for WrestleMania cus they had Starrcade.
You're probably correct. No telling how many names they would have used from the WWF/E. They would have owned it all anyways.