While I'm sure there will be alot of people who disagree with me here, I'm wondering what WWE is thinking in reguards to the WWE Title lately? I do understand that champions cannot have long title reigns these days without fans being in an uproar. However, the WWE Championship has been passed around too much in the last 5 or 6 months. You have the title switching at an alarmingly consistent rate and sometimes as often as every few weeks or a month. Look at Del Rio's first WWE title reign. It was what? 2 or 3 weeks? A month at most? Then Cena won again and then lost it back to Del Rio. Don't get me wrong here. I enjoy title switches and surprizes as much as the next fan. Doing that every so often does alot to really enhance the "anything can happen in the WWE" type of feel to their product.
The point being is that WWE is beginning to become worse than TNA for switching the title too often without a very good storyline reason to do so. How can people get meaningful title reigns and cement their legacies if the title is so meaningless that it switches every PPV?
The point being is that WWE is beginning to become worse than TNA for switching the title too often without a very good storyline reason to do so. How can people get meaningful title reigns and cement their legacies if the title is so meaningless that it switches every PPV?