Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think it's great. Weed can stimulate the economy, get crime down, and it's better than cigarettes.
As long as it is taxed and regulated, then I am for national legalization.
Boy Razor you sure use your mouth perttier then a twenty dollar ****e.This comes down to an issue between state and federal rights, of which I'm sure FTS and myself can punch each other in the gut over at sometime or another.
As far as right now, this is just another issue that is already straining the relationship between the federal and state governments. If California legalizes it, then Obama is going to have to decide whether or not to consider the entire state of California federal criminals, and I don't believe that is a fair topic to thrust upon the man who also has a failing economy, healthcare, and wars to consider. Not only that, but he's got a run away Democrat party in the shape of Pelosi seemingly joining forces with a stick in the mud Republican party to undermine his every move.
Vermont. That's right, Vermont, has 9 (or 7...can't remember which) people running for state positions that consider secession a viable option. They have gone on record with the Associated Press stating as such. They consider treason a viable option. Combine that with other things that have been said in the form of secession from the likes of Alaska and Texas (amongst a few others), and you have a situation you shouldn't be tempting with poking Obama with a stick and seeing if he'll go along with a state outright contradicting federal law.
So, with that said, I believe the ruling shouldn't even be up to a vote. The federal law should be challenged on a federal level, and taken up there.
Would Jane try weed if it were legal? That's the real question here.
I'm sending you a pound in the mail.
Wait, you live in Canada. Shit's already legal up there, is it not?