Originally Posted by mrpops
WCW always sucked and thats why they failed.
They always sucked, huh? I guess that's why WCW kicked WWF/WWE's ass in the ratings for so long in the late 1990s. People must have preferred WCW to WWF during that time because they sucked so much.
Originally Posted by mrpops
They were so behind and didnt know what the fuck they were doing and died.
WCW was "behind" the WWF/WWE (ratings-wise, for sure) toward the end of their run, but they definitely would have remained on television had it not been for the AOL/Time Warner buy-out. These brand new "powers that be" didn't want a wrestling show PERIOD...it probably wouldn't have mattered if WCW "knew what the fuck" they were doing or not. Do your research, you just sound ignorant.
Originally Posted by mrpops
And vince russo needs to fucking die.
Wow, I knew a lot of people didn't like Russo's booking -- but do you really hate his booking enough to wish him dead? Do you hate his booking so much that you'd be willing to murder him? Jesus, some people.
Did you completely forget that Russo was one of the guys responsible for getting the WWF back on top of the ratings? You know that WWF almost got swallowed whole by WCW back then, right? I know that Russo doesn't deserve ALL of the credit, but you can't deny that he had his hand in the Attitude Era's high level of success. I know, I know...you want him dead...I didn't forget.
Originally Posted by mrpops
The difference between WCW/TNA and WWE is painfully obviously.
Wow, "...painfully obviously...". I'm absolutely stunned that you didn't bother to proof-read your post before clicking "Submit Reply".
Yes, their programming is different...it's because WWE & TNA/Impact Wrestling are booked and/or written by different people. That happens because no two human beings think exactly the same way; much like you & I don't (thank God).
Originally Posted by mrpops
WWE builds storylines over a long period of time(or atleast they try to). WCW/TNA has twists and turns every 2 fucking seconds and none of the viewers have a fucking clue as to what the hell is going on.
I don't know why you said that "none of the viewers" know what's going on, since I'm a TNA viewer...and I know EXACTLY what's going on. Oh wait a minute - I know what the problem is! You must not watch Impact every Thursday. I bet someone who didn't watch WWE every week wouldn't know what's going on either. Wouldn't you think? Maybe I'm just insane, since I happen to understand what's happening on TNA programming. I can even explain it to you, if you want.
Near the end of WCW's run, they HAD to rush storylines...because the higher-ups didn't want to wait for a slow-build, they wanted immediate payoffs. That's probably not the best way to run a wrestling company, but WCW was forced to rush the angles anyway. Too bad, because some of those storylines in WCW2000 could have been a lot better with a slower build.
Goldberg mule-kicking Bret Hart (and causing a career-ending concussion) didn't help things either, since a lot of their programming (at least main-event storylines) were probably based around Hart for the better part of a year or so. Too bad, since it seemed that Bret was finally going to get the storyline he deserved in WCW. Oh well, shit happens. Again, WCW changed the main-event storylines at the last minute because their main guy (Bret Hart) could no longer perform. I guess they should have just retired their Heavyweight Championship instead, so that fans like you wouldn't become "confused" by a change in the storyline.
Originally Posted by mrpops
Watching a WCW episode was sad. Every 2 seconds it was "OMG he turned on him", but next week it "was all part of the plan", then "the real plan" would come next week...but wait! It "was x character all along"....but then "bischoff was the real culprit!"....omg wait.."it was kevin nash and the nwblow!".... WCW = clusterfuck of television.
You're right. WCW had a formula that kept the fans guessing. That might have been the reason that they got such high ratings for a time, you think? ...you know, since Raw was pre-taped at the time, and Nitro wasn't? Bischoff was even quoted as saying something like: "...you didn't know what was going to happen on OUR show...but we could tell you what was going to happen on the competition!...". I apologize that this quote isn't verbatim, but I know that it's pretty darn close.
Did that formula work all the time? No, it didn't. Does it work now for TNA? It's "painfully obviously" (LOL) that it doesn't work NEARLY as well as it did in WCW. I think the main reason it doesn't work is because TNA is a taped show. If/when they start having live shows, those twists/turns in the storyline(s) will work much better. I think even Bischoff, Hogan & Russo know that it's "painfully obviously" that running a taped show every week (performed in the same "arena" each week) isn't exactly going to give them that edge they're looking for. There's no way their ratings are going to elevate unless they start running a live show every week, and get out of the Impact Zone/do some traveling (just like WWE does, and WCW used to do).
Yes, I know that TNA tried going live on Mondays last year...and it didn't last. If they had a live show on Thursdays instead (a show that's NOT up against WWE's flagship show), they might produce better ratings. I'm not saying they definitely would, but I think they'd have a better chance at it. IMHO, I thought that Impact was more exciting when it was live...even though it only ran live every other week.