I just finished watching on you tube the worst gimmicks in wrestling I agreed with most but I had to question one.
Right to Censor I think it was a great idea but just poorly done. They were during the attitude era when wrestling needed the most censorship (if there ever was). They were perfect to get under our skin and for us to hate, what I didnt agree with was the fact when they beat some one ( where the stipulation was if x loses they join RTC) the ppl joined with no extra fight. Another thing I didnt like was the fact they always seem to win if someone was going to lose their gimmick if they lose.
So was the gimmick bad or was it just mishandled?
Do u think a similar gimmick would work today?
Right to Censor I think it was a great idea but just poorly done. They were during the attitude era when wrestling needed the most censorship (if there ever was). They were perfect to get under our skin and for us to hate, what I didnt agree with was the fact when they beat some one ( where the stipulation was if x loses they join RTC) the ppl joined with no extra fight. Another thing I didnt like was the fact they always seem to win if someone was going to lose their gimmick if they lose.
So was the gimmick bad or was it just mishandled?
Do u think a similar gimmick would work today?