Me and a friend were talking about Wrestling, and then the topic shifted to Brock Lesnar, my friend told me that Kurt Angle was stronger than Brock Lesnar back in 2003. He told me that him and Lesnar had a competition to see who could tackle the other down, and Angle won. I think this is complete bullshit, but I still have doubts. Is it actually true?
Was Kurt Angle actually stronger than Brock Lesnar in 2003?
- Thread starter Disarm
- Start date
Stronger? I don't know about that. I think that you may have misinterpreted your friend when he said "tackle". He probably meant a "take down" that they do in wrestling where the wrestler tries to take his opponent to the mat and the opponent has to sprawl so that they don't get taken down. When he said tackle, I don't think he meant a football tackle. Lesnar and Angle probably had a mat wrestling contest where Angle took down Brock. I would believe this because Angle has more skill than Brock. I think Angle mentioned something about winning the gold medal in the Olympics with a broken freaking neck. I don't know. Something like that. But Lesnar is definitely stronger than Angle. More skilled in wrestling? That honor has to go to Angle.
