THTRobtaylor
Once & Future Wrestlezone Columnist
This will be my last post on this site because there are too many people who cannot read. This is about main-eventing Wrestlemania one year and dropping off the NEXT year. My disgust is not pointed at those who think people dropped off further than Slaughter. That's fine. It's your opinion and I see many of your points.
But, the idiots on this site who answer questions that aren't asked is infuriating. You say Bundy because Slaughter still has a job with the company?!?! WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH MIZ'S/OP'S ORIGINAL POINT?!!? It is a one-year-to-the-next topic and you dumbasses come in with your pre-made decisions and post nonsense.
Enjoy each other. I love wrestling and what it offers, but you people are sad and hopeless. Good luck in life, losers.
Bye...
As for some of the other suggestions...
Bundy: - Again he was only ever a one shot deal, he was not going to main event another PPV after WM2, he was just the biggest heel they had at the time, and they needed an injury angle to sell the show...
DiBiase - If they had been serious about him as a main eventer, he would have won the Tourney at WM4... it feeds into my argument about Hogan and Andre being joint winners... Savage was the logical main eventer if they weren't, DiBiase again was the most natural heel in that equation, not the most natural main eventer...a year later, he's feuding with Brutus, again the most natural heel for that match...
Savage - Sure, 8 to 9 was massive drop off, but it is important to note that Randy was back in a big match the following year... it is entirely possible that injury was a part of him not having a match at WM9... I would have much rather seen him vs Shawn Michaels than Tatanka...