Vince McMahon's New Project | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Vince McMahon's New Project

Oh some say I might be delusional, but at least I'm not the world's biggest asshole. You my friend have that title all tied up.

Yes I read the drivel you spouted and while you started out well, it all came back to your usual argument. A rant on how WWE fans and the IWC in general are idiots, we must take what is handed to us and like it, have no opinion, follow the WWE corporate mandate, cheer when we're supposed to and boo who we should hate.

Yes we should all be like you. The problem is we aren't, and while you can't stand the IWC, and are the most unsociable person I've ever run across, you are a member of the IWC, and you post on a social network site. The irony is astounding.

Why you care what everyone else cares about and get so upset about it is the funniest thing I've ever seen to be honest. I don't care who you like, or who you don't, because I don't care about you period. If you burst into flames tomorrow wouldn't bother me a bit. And here's a newsflash for you, Vince McMahon wouldn't care either.

No. What I am saying is, if you don't like what WWE wants, then stop watching it. Switch off, don't buy tickets to their shows, don't give them a cent.

I don't know how clearer to make that. What is wrong with what I said? You can't change the programming, so do what you can do, and either accept what is put in front of you, or stop following it. Your choice. Vince isn't going to change because some people write on this site (I doubt they even read these posts. Like you said, Vince doesn't care what we say).

But don't complain. Either watch or don't watch. But to keep watching something you hate, that makes you unhappy and fails to live up to your expectations, and then coming on and whining about it, week after week, is tiresome.

No one is making you follow WWE. If it doesn't appeal to you anymore, then maybe it is time to close that chapter. There are far more important things in life than what Vince McMahon does on his shows. If what Vince does doesn't sell, then one day the company will go under. The proof will be in the pudding. Bleating about the unfairness of what WWE is one of the most useless things possible.

It is like going to a restaurant, buying a steak. It isn't cooked and you complain. But then you keep going back, week after week, keep getting bad steak, and keep paying for it, and then complaining about it, when you can simply stop buying steak from them. Then you go to review the restaurant, and give it a bad report. But then you keep giving weekly updates, telling people to avoid it, but you keep going back, again and again. You're a glutton for punishment.

Get a damn reality check. Your life must be pretty good, if your biggest problem is Vince McMahon's decision making. I have had to deal with a family death, and whether I would lose my home and my job in the last few months, and it ain't over yet. I am having real problems to deal with, so pardon me if the state of the WWE is way down my list of things that anger me.If watching RAW, no matter how bad an episode, makes me forget things that suck more in my life at the moment, then so be it. I come on here to talk about something I love with fellow fans who also love the product, and all I get are people who want to complain about the most, banal, trivial things, rather than being thankful that the biggest problem you face is what someone millionaire in a wrestling company does. Get a life!

Besides, you do care what I like, since you say that the only reason I like WWE is because I am an apologist, and can't see their faults. So you're right, and those who disagree with you are wrong, is that it?

I suggest quit following wrestling, or watch the minor league stuff you like, and find other things to fill your time, since you must have a lot of good things waiting for you, if your biggest concern is WWE programming. Walk in my shoes for a day and then come and talk to me about what's really important.
 
I still cringe at a Strowman push considering he still can't even get basic strikes right. He always looks like he overextends his punches, making them look really soft, or it will seem like he just missed. He makes Big Show look like a convincing brawler, and Shows body shots are probably the worst in his arsenal. If he gets any kind of PPV match right now, it will SUCK. It's even worse that Big Show is apparently his first opponent, as while Show is an underrated performer, 'big men vs big men' are never very exciting. Rowan is a much better performer than Braun and his TLC (and Chairs) bout with Show was mediocre.

I still think Braun Strowman should've appeared to assist with Wyatts battle against Ambreigns and gone down to NXT for learning purposes, only re-appearing on the Main Roster when the Wyatts need him. If they did that, his
- appearances would be special.
- Harper and Rowan wouldn't look so irrelevant.
- Bray would seem more threatening, as we wouldn't be reminded on a nightly basis that he is apparently not the strongest in his own stable.
- Braun Strowman would be learning and would get better before being forced down our throats.

But while this is an interesting topic, I don't get why people are fighting so passionately over it. Am I really seeing "If you don't like what WWE is doing, stop watching it"? We're not allowed to criticize? Because if we didn't, Wrestlemania 30 would've been 'Batista Vs Randy Orton'.
 
Braun Strowman is a fat lump who does 2 moves and no promo skills, how is even a half credible opponent for the Undertaker? Then again, 2 years ago they had Brock Lesnar, a guy does 3 moves and has no microphone skills, end the Streak, so I guess anything's possible, although IMO Strowman definitely doesn't deserve to be in the same ring as the Legend who is the Undertaker IMO.
 
Braun Strowman is a fat lump who does 2 moves and no promo skills, how is even a half credible opponent for the Undertaker? Then again, 2 years ago they had Brock Lesnar, a guy does 3 moves and has no microphone skills, end the Streak, so I guess anything's possible, although IMO Strowman definitely doesn't deserve to be in the same ring as the Legend who is the Undertaker IMO.

To be fair, the legend was forged from the conquests of crappy wrestlers. The Undertaker pretty much has wrestling everyone in WWE history, terrible and skilled alike.

But I dont want to see 'Strowman Vs Taker'. I don't know who would be a good opponent for the Dead Man. Adam Rose?
 
To be fair, the legend was forged from the conquests of crappy wrestlers. The Undertaker pretty much has wrestling everyone in WWE history, terrible and skilled alike.

But I dont want to see 'Strowman Vs Taker'. I don't know who would be a good opponent for the Dead Man. Adam Rose?

I thought they might have had Undertaker v Bray Wyatt again, but looks like Wyatt might fight Brock at WM32 (which doesn't really appeal to me).

One match they have never done on PPV- Undertaker v Chris Jericho. Jericho's back, and unless Jericho fights A.J. Styles (it looks like they might do it at "FastLane" instead), then this would be an interesting match, since these two have rarely fought each other.
 
To be fair, the legend was forged from the conquests of crappy wrestlers. The Undertaker pretty much has wrestling everyone in WWE history, terrible and skilled alike.

But I dont want to see 'Strowman Vs Taker'. I don't know who would be a good opponent for the Dead Man. Adam Rose?

Don't be daft, Adam Rose is a member of the second coming of the Job Squad :D

Seriously though, at the moment I can't really think of anyone outside of Kane again, or at a push, John Cena, for Taker to have a good match against in what might be his last Wrestle Mania, he needs to go out on a high with a credible opponent, but not someone who might hurt him legit.
 
If Vince was smart, he'd probably just give Undertaker a year off and have him wrestle Sting at WrestleMania 33.

Being a big guy isn't as much of a spectacle these days. During Andre's prime, he was the only person of his size running around. These days we've seen big men getting demolished too many times for it to be difficult for us to imagine.

I don't think anyone would be shocked if The Undertaker defeats Braun Strowman, and I don't think anyone would accept it if Braun Strowman defeats The Undertaker.
 
If Vince was smart, he'd probably just give Undertaker a year off and have him wrestle Sting at WrestleMania 33.

Being a big guy isn't as much of a spectacle these days. During Andre's prime, he was the only person of his size running around. These days we've seen big men getting demolished too many times for it to be difficult for us to imagine.

I don't think anyone would be shocked if The Undertaker defeats Braun Strowman, and I don't think anyone would accept it if Braun Strowman defeats The Undertaker.

Sting has retired, and has a neck inury like Austin and Edge, which he sustained in the match with Seth Rollins at "NOC". Why do you think he is going into the HoF, and also I read that he announced his retirement.

He could have surgery for it, but was going to retire anyway, and doesn't want to risk further injury for another match. Sting v Undertaker should have happened last year at WM31. That ship has sailed, unfortunately.
 
I don't really trust Vince with this. I'd much rather see him show in the ring how legit he is. It's not hard for a big guy to get over anyways. We seen guys like Ryback and Brock run through jobbers. It's alarming to me how protected Strowman is
 
They could always turn Roman Reigns heel and Brock Lesnar-ize him by having him take on Taker for Wrestlemania. Granted, there wouldn't be enough time to develop it, but at least it would be an intriguing match.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top