USA wonder goal against Germany | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

USA wonder goal against Germany

I know some of you get up at different times to watch American stuff, but Americans won't do that. I won't do that, and I like soccer.
Speak for yourself, YOU won't do that. Millions of Americans will if they like it; Olympics is one example. Why people don't know how diverse America is and that we have millions of people from other countries is confusing.

Also, you can say what you want, but Football and Basketball are much better TV sports and more consistently entertaining. Baseball and hockey are boring all the time, but to just deny that Soccer provides a lot of duds almost close to the level of baseball is just lying. I think you are talking about a lot of stuff you don't know about in that post.
You have a lot opinions in your post you try to pass off as facts.
 
Also, you can say what you want, but Football and Basketball are much better TV sports and more consistently entertaining. Baseball and hockey are boring all the time, but to just deny that Soccer provides a lot of duds almost close to the level of baseball is just lying. I think you are talking about a lot of stuff you don't know about in that post.
Erm... just because you think baseball and hockey are boring all the time doesn't mean they are. Just because you think football and basketball are more entertaining consistently on TV doesn't mean they are. My reply to KB was simply to say that basing his argument on purely international games is flawed as the same can be said on other major sports. Your rant is incoherent and contribute nothing but you thinking your opinions/experience = facts.

I'll agree with you those sports are much better for TV. They have scheduled or official timeouts in between 5-10mins of action. 30s-1min of official dead ball breaks to slot in advertisement spots. Stoppages in soccer can be between 1s to a minute, no way to sell ads for them.
 
I'm sure the club games are more exciting. Over here though, the world cup is pretty much all anyone cares about. It's the only soccer I ever watch.

I have high hopes for Brazil 2014 being a good tournament. The issue with recent international tournaments post Germany 06 is that a significant amount of players in the tournament are likely to have played over 60 games per season for their clubs, so it is rare that the top players really demonstrate their capabilities. Sometimes a country not equalling the sum of its parts can be quite baffling too (looking at you, Netherlands).

The UEFA Champions League seems to be the tournament with enough financial incentive to bring the best out of players, couple that with its appearance every year rather than every 4 and its not a huge surprise that the big players will put on bigger performances there, rather than at a European or World Cup.
 
Speak for yourself, YOU won't do that. Millions of Americans will if they like it; Olympics is one example. Why people don't know how diverse America is and that we have millions of people from other countries is confusing.

You have a lot opinions in your post you try to pass off as facts.

Ok buddy this is the part where I make you eat your words. European and Southern Americans don't even watch the olympics for soccer because everyone has to be U23 besides I believe 3 players you can have exempt.

I love soccer. I come from a soccer family, I don't really need to go in detail but look on page 2... I was actually sticking up for soccer. I'm just honest about what it is. That's the problem with a lot of soccer fans, you guys really don't even know the sport you are talking about. Then you compound that problem by not understanding demographics or markets. Yes America is diverse that's why we have friendlys between foreign countries in NY because they have such a large amount of immigrants from those two countries they can pull sell outs in the Yankees stadium or Met life. However, that population is still not sizeable enough for Soccer to really get good tv contracts (which is where sports teams make money now) or good time slots. It is definitely helping and I think it will get their one day, but some American soccer fans sound so arrogant yet they look so stupid and unathletic a real soccer player would think they never played the game its almost unbearable to even sit in the same stadium as them. Which is not a good problem to have considering the MLS is unbearable to watch to begin with.

To the other dude saying just because they are better tv sports doesn't mean they are more entertaining. Follow me here, I'll try to break this down for you as simply as I can because its obvious you are in denial or just... I'll censor myself. Basketball and football draw higher ratings than those other sports... baseball which is supposedly America's sport and this and that, has a lower attendance average than not only Football and Basketball but Soccer also. Espn won't even pick up hockey and hockey's ratings and figures in general are a joke. I'm from the northeast, hockey is huge in 6 cities and I can name them if you'd like, but in the rest of the country it isn't shit. Especially south of the Mason Dixie.


Y'all are barking up the wrong tree.... this other dude was givin me shit for sticking up for soccer, now I'm getting shit for explaining why it will never get huge ratings. I mean this dude I quoted showed no proof, he probably can't for what he is saying. Olympics soccer? Are you fucking kidding me? Next time you try to make up something google it first. I don't even think we qualified in America for the last Olympics but again I could be wrong on that, we may have squeaked in. And I like most Americans, don't pay attention to the olympics so I could be referring to Beijing. I know though with 100% confidence that most federations don't care about the Olympics at all, it is a developmental tournament to any nation that considers itself competitive in their confederation tournaments or the world cup...


But please, go ahead and treat me more like I'm talking out my ass.


Also one more thing to this Alasstor or whatever who doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. Their are no international American football games, the baseball World Cup and international games are ignored by American viewers and players, and FIBA which I bet goes over your head is a joke to Americans... My point was actually more insulting to Americans than soccer, we are self centered. We think the world should run on our time. The only comparison that you make which could even be misconstrued for being valid is hockey, and that is even a reach... Sorry for the run on, the literate people will know what I'm referring to.
 
I have high hopes for Brazil 2014 being a good tournament. The issue with recent international tournaments post Germany 06 is that a significant amount of players in the tournament are likely to have played over 60 games per season for their clubs, so it is rare that the top players really demonstrate their capabilities. Sometimes a country not equalling the sum of its parts can be quite baffling too (looking at you, Netherlands).

The UEFA Champions League seems to be the tournament with enough financial incentive to bring the best out of players, couple that with its appearance every year rather than every 4 and its not a huge surprise that the big players will put on bigger performances there, rather than at a European or World Cup.

Wow somebody who actually understands the sport and the nature of it. Players don't make money playing international soccer, I mean they do a little bit but it is chump change compared to Champions League teams or teams that are competing for a spot....

But I mean you are from England, people from England and Soccer or Football nations in general can go either way. They either have a hard time understanding different people have different preferences or they actually know what they are talking about. You are definitely in the latter. I would say football, I know how y'all hate it over their but it seems so awkward to someone born and raised in the states to refer to it as football. Hope I didn't put you off with my other posts... you are probably the only one I would wish I didn't offend, a couple others too
 
Here's what made me not want to watch soccer anymore:

It was the World Cup and America was playing I think England. England scores like 10 minutes in. Commentators: "That's it. The game is over. There's no way America can possibly come back."

1. There are 80 minutes left.

2. Why should I watch if you've already determined that it's over?

This is highly unconventional, unless the commentary is biased like on Chelsea TV or Man U Tv and shit. But what you saw was a friendly....so maybe it was just English commentators being idiots.


In football, commentators tend to hype till the final whistle blown, and a goal after 10 minutes usually result in a 'there could be more goals in this one' remark from the stick men.



Highly unconventional that soundbite ya heard man.
 
This is highly unconventional, unless the commentary is biased like on Chelsea TV or Man U Tv and shit. But what you saw was a friendly....so maybe it was just English commentators being idiots.


In football, commentators tend to hype till the final whistle blown, and a goal after 10 minutes usually result in a 'there could be more goals in this one' remark from the stick men.



Highly unconventional that soundbite ya heard man.

I don't know where you are from, but in Soccer in America that is the norm. It is sad but true. The announcers are really awful, but I mean if you actually like sports you aren't going to stop watching one because of something some announcer said this one time. You really have to be from America to truly see how bad it is, or just spend a lot of time here. I mean, like I said in an earlier post. We got garbage players who you think can't get any worse until you have to listen to them for 90 mins. That's why I only watch Champions League here, because that other idiot who said he doesn't watch soccer because it is boring but then decides to try to talk about why Americans like it lol... what an idiot is because you have to pay like an extra 15 30 bucks to get a decent channel that broadcasts EPL and Bundesliga games at a good time for us without complete trash announcers....
 
Here's what made me not want to watch soccer anymore:

It was the World Cup and America was playing I think England. England scores like 10 minutes in. Commentators: "That's it. The game is over. There's no way America can possibly come back."

1. There are 80 minutes left.

2. Why should I watch if you've already determined that it's over?

Those commentators are optimistic to think England wouldn't screw it up at some point.
 
After seeing that clip it's really obvious why football hasn't taken off in the US, that commentary is awful.
 
^^It's a combination of just overall presentation and the domestic leagues. The developmental system for soccer players is worse than the wwe's developmental system. Somethings are just meant to be a certain way, it used to make me mad when I was younger and really cared, but soccer is just not destined to take off in America.

Soccer and Hockey are the two sports that really don't fit with having college sports serve as the pipeline for developing talent. Basketball is suffering a lot too, but it's all based around making money and Football and Basketball make enough profit to support pretty much every other men's and women's sport in college.

It may raise in popularity a little bit, but our league will never be attractive. I know people who actually covered Pele when he was there and stuff like that from back in the day. If the NASL couldn't make soccer take off, having one or two recycled stars at a time won't work. I'll just mention Cruyff and Pele, and then you try to compare Beckham and Henry (I loved Henry back in the day and I can't stand the French) it's quite a joke.

I think the quicker everyone accepts it, American soccer fans and the rest of the world that Soccer/Football is number one that it will not be where it should be in America the better for everyone
 
International football is a shit advert for the game if you're a neutral, the last 6 or 7 World and European Cups were ruined by snotty, card happy referees who made damn near every game predictable with an average of a sending off a match. Kills the game. The last World Cup and any match with Howard Webb refereeing are notable exceptions.
 
Actually, if a referee has oiled or slicked back hair, then chances are he's a cunt and somebody is taking an early bath round about the 60 minute mark.
 
For the genius in this thread.
Here's your american football international games

http://www.ifaf.info/pages/competition/senior

There are also baseball and hockey international tourneys. Just because they are shit doesn't mean they don't exist. Literate people will know you just can't see past your own self-centered points to consider what others bring to the table. Just because you are self-centered, you want to tar your whole nation as such. As for bringing in ratings into explaining why certain sport is better suited for TV, are you serious? I hope I don't need to explain how that doesn't make any valid point. Ratings only reflect the popularity of the sports, not whether is is better suited for broadcasters to extract maximum revenue.

You are just shit at getting your point across. Shit at even taking sides in argument. And shit at reading comprehension.
 
For the genius in this thread.
Here's your american football international games

http://www.ifaf.info/pages/competition/senior

There are also baseball and hockey international tourneys. Just because they are shit doesn't mean they don't exist. Literate people will know you just can't see past your own self-centered points to consider what others bring to the table. Just because you are self-centered, you want to tar your whole nation as such. As for bringing in ratings into explaining why certain sport is better suited for TV, are you serious? I hope I don't need to explain how that doesn't make any valid point. Ratings only reflect the popularity of the sports, not whether is is better suited for broadcasters to extract maximum revenue.

You are just shit at getting your point across. Shit at even taking sides in argument. And shit at reading comprehension.

Buddy can you please tell me what FIBA is? I refer to all the international tournaments.... I can't believe this moron is saying I have bad comprehension when he clearly didn't understand any of my posts. Sometimes I feel like Fred Samford cause I'm surrounded by garbage. I didn't convey why a sport is better than another, just why soccer will never do good in America. You are the moron who takes that personally. I'll even make it easier to you, I already acknowledged your argument in that post, and debunked it before you wrote it. You wasted your time and I'm beginning to see I am because I'm clearly talking to a rock. You had to google these things, I actually know about them as an American sports fan. The only thing I don't know what you are talking about, and I'm not looking up is your reference to International American Football. Their is no such thing, if the best players aren't playing, people won't watch. Seriously, use your head or I'm ignoring you. How old are you anyways? Who says someone else has awful reading comprehension when they can't even write. Take an English class, kings or not.

Also one more thing to this Alasstor or whatever who doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. Their are no international American football games, the baseball World Cup and international games are ignored by American viewers and players, and FIBA which I bet goes over your head is a joke to Americans... My point was actually more insulting to Americans than soccer, we are self centered. We think the world should run on our time. The only comparison that you make which could even be misconstrued for being valid is hockey, and that is even a reach... Sorry for the run on, the literate people will know what I'm referring to.
 
Bonus points for calling it footy, Lariat.

But I mean you are from England, people from England and Soccer or Football nations in general can go either way.

Scotland actually, but I'll let you off.



I'm not sure what direction this thread is going now to be honest. It started with how commentators can affect one's pleasure of viewing a sporting event, then Miko called refs *****, then it seemed to spin into why football isn't big stateside.

A question for the Americans; how much did David Beckham help raise the profile of the game over there? The British POV is skewed somewhat by the mad football journalists, so I'm genuinely curious as it seems to have been from around 2006-10 that people took more notice of the MLS, but I think one could argue that was down to the national team's relative success at World Cups rather than brand Beckham.
 
Bonus points for calling it footy, Lariat.



Scotland actually, but I'll let you off.



I'm not sure what direction this thread is going now to be honest. It started with how commentators can affect one's pleasure of viewing a sporting event, then Miko called refs *****, then it seemed to spin into why football isn't big stateside.

A question for the Americans; how much did David Beckham help raise the profile of the game over there? The British POV is skewed somewhat by the mad football journalists, so I'm genuinely curious as it seems to have been from around 2006-10 that people took more notice of the MLS, but I think one could argue that was down to the national team's relative success at World Cups rather than brand Beckham.

Short version: Barely at all.

Long version:

Barely at all. People heard he was here, said "oh cool" and went about their day. MLS games show up on ESPN2 at like 10:30 at night once a week. People knew it existed a bit more while Beckham was here, but the league has been very slowly (but steadily) growing. It started in 1994 and the first profit wasn't turned until a few years back.
 
A question for the Americans; how much did David Beckham help raise the profile of the game over there? The British POV is skewed somewhat by the mad football journalists, so I'm genuinely curious as it seems to have been from around 2006-10 that people took more notice of the MLS, but I think one could argue that was down to the national team's relative success at World Cups rather than brand Beckham.

Here's the thing, I don't think Americans knew much or cared much for Beckham before he came. They mostly just knew him as the soccer player who married Posh Spice. For fans like me I followed his debut but it failed quickly with injuries and strife. It never really grew to amount to much even when he won a couple championships.

That being said it was still good for what it brought and hopefully that won't be lost now that he is gone. MLS is doing fine. Most teams have met their goal of having their own stadium. The growth has been continuous. The league seems to add a new city every year or two and hasn't retracted much since their first couple of years. They are getting a second NY team and there are talks of Miami.

They are clearly focused on continuing to build fans through youth leagues/kids (like the WWE), and bringing in international guys that meet the ethnic diversity of a particular city. HD has helped as well as the success of World Cup 94 and the men's and women's national teams. It also helps that sports like baseball, football and basketball are sometimes getting dragged out to no end both in length of time and cost of a ticket. MLS is wrapped up in a nice tight package where you know what you're gonna get.

I don't think it will get huge in my lifetime. The low scoring hurts the ability to make stars. There's not much of a gambling aspect if any. Most of the best Americans end up overseas and for some reasons ties hurt people's feelings. The best bets are for football be ruled to violent or for the US Men's National Team to win the World Cup. It would be interesting to see what happens to American soccer if the can get their foot in to African American inner culture but it is unlikely since the space is too valuable (see golf).

Ramble, ramble, ramble.
 
It's a shame that football isn't a huge sport over in the States. They have a pretty decent national team that could really beat a lot of other good teams on their day. If they put half of the effort into developing the sport as they do for basketball or American Football, then I could see them actively being one of the most dominant forces in world football.
 
Bonus points for calling it footy, Lariat.

I like bonus points.


Scotland actually, but I'll let you off.

Celtic FC rules!


I'm not sure what direction this thread is going now to be honest. It started with how commentators can affect one's pleasure of viewing a sporting event, then Miko called refs *****, then it seemed to spin into why football isn't big stateside.

Sounds about right.

A question for the Americans; how much did David Beckham help raise the profile of the game over there? The British POV is skewed somewhat by the mad football journalists, so I'm genuinely curious as it seems to have been from around 2006-10 that people took more notice of the MLS, but I think one could argue that was down to the national team's relative success at World Cups rather than brand Beckham.

Very little.

The USA National Team is where the attention was payed, not MLS Soccer or Becks. Beckham may have given the league some cred, but as far as popularity, it's still behind baseball, basketball, American football, tennis, golf, MMA, and hockey.
 
I hate seeing Ter Stegen fuck up like that :( but on the other hand if his reputation takes a hit it might slightly improve the odds of Liverpool having a chance of getting him :D
Commentary teams are usually absolutely dire i wouldn't take anything they say on board. To get a commentary team that's tolerable is an achievement.

Also, Germany was playing it's B-Team against the US, so it's not like this was a world-killing major event in footy or anything.

Marc-Andre ter Stegen; Marcell Jansen, Benedikt Höwedes, Per Mertesacker, Sven Bender; Lars Bender, Stefan Reinartz; Andre Schürrle, Julian Draxler, Lukas Podolski; Miroslav Klose

That's the Germany team, despite being their B-Team at least 7 of those players could make most international teams. The amount of strength in depth Germany have at the moment is scary.
 
It seems as though there are fewer and fewer threads where I dont call somebody a cunt
 
Bonus points for calling it footy, Lariat.



Scotland actually, but I'll let you off.



I'm not sure what direction this thread is going now to be honest. It started with how commentators can affect one's pleasure of viewing a sporting event, then Miko called refs *****, then it seemed to spin into why football isn't big stateside.

A question for the Americans; how much did David Beckham help raise the profile of the game over there? The British POV is skewed somewhat by the mad football journalists, so I'm genuinely curious as it seems to have been from around 2006-10 that people took more notice of the MLS, but I think one could argue that was down to the national team's relative success at World Cups rather than brand Beckham.

lol I apologize, I was drinking so I can't even really try to explain myself there. I usually try to not bring up someones nationality or refer to the continent if I can't look at the location and see where they are from maybe your not scotland messed with me lol. Again, my bad.

As either revolving door, or lariat already covered, who I would like to say appear to know the game very well. I only say appear, not in the context of a backhanded compliment but because I never really read a thread about soccer on here before so they do know the game.

Beckham did not help, he was a joke to much of the media from the beginning. I never got to the bottom of it because it started to become too confusing and misconstrued, but when they said he signed a contract for 25 mil a year nobody believed it. Soccer fans, and fans of other sports who they were trying to attract. Then it comes out well part of his contract includes advertiser money. People saw it for what it was immediately.

Also as previously mentioned, his injuries. That actually did more harm than good because soccer already gets a bad rep in this overtly macho nation. Finally, Beckham was known only for marrying posh spice or victoria as another person said. A lot of jokes were made in good humor, but it kind of falls into a bigger picture of how people see him. A metrosexual, a lil gay and in this nation you put that with soccer, it will not help. I really think that if the MLS could have landed Keane towards the end of his career or a tougher more "macho" player for lack of a less gay word (see it even applies to me) it would have helped soccer more rather then Beckham. Even though every shit free kick goal he scored was all over sports center on ESPN because of bend it like Beckham, even when it was due to awful goal keeping.

Somehow though, and I'm really struggling to explain this. The MLS and soccer in general is making great momentum. It kind of sucks because I don't think it will get to the level I would like to see it at in my lifetime, but it really looks like it could become a strong number 2 someday in this country. As I said, it already averages higher attendance than hockey, baseball and basketball. Yet basketball is deceiving because of the arenas they play in, so you can't fit what you would be able to fit outdoors.

I don't know what it is, if they improved figuring out which markets will really like soccer, but certain teams stadiums are crazy during matches. I can't watch American soccer for the life of me, it is part of the reason I quit playing in college. Yet I believe it is the Portland Timbers and Seattle have great fan bases. Then you have Toronto, with a great fanbase because Toronto is a city of immigrants. I mean that's why I think they have a great soccer fan base. It really has improved, but then you'll see cities like Kansas City where the teams are playing in front of a triple digit crowd pretty much.

Hope I didn't write too much, it's just good to discuss and debate soccer/football with people who actually know it. Outside of my family and my father's friends, nobody really gets the game here. After seeing Alastor's posts I see that dumb people are everywhere, we just have a high concentration here.


Just one last thing about Beckham, the best part about watching him play was seeing guys gun for him. Hacks and untalented nobodies trying to make their come up off of sticking Beckham and then being too slow and nailing him badly. Then Beckham getting up and getting into it because while Beckham was far more skilled than all these guys, I don't know if I'd pick him in a fight. I can't really criticize anyone though, I don't blame the nobodies because if I played here that would have been me only I would have fought him. Might as well get your 15 seconds, and Beckham has to react how he did. Some of the tackles were awful and it was the same person doing it in matches repeatedly.


Oops it was the Barber who said something I said. I just want to give him his props because he's a smart dude, I'm impressed he knows the game as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top