I'm glad Brock Lesnar beat the streak and not John Cena. Brock can now pass the torch to multiple guys like Cesaro, Reigns, Wyatt, AND Cena; while if it was Cena who beat the streak, he would keep the torch all to himself. I'm sure that's why Taker picked Brock and not Cena. And that's why if Undertaker does come back to have one last hurrah, he will pick the respected, selfless Sting as his opponent who has gotten given so many young wrestlers the rub, rather than Cena. Cena should be happy with "Thrice in a lifetime" getting the final match of the card, where he can beat The Rock again and pull every last torch out of him- all for himself.
Yes how dare the top face, who has already put over many people (Bryan, Sheamus, Edge, Punk, Ziggler, Miz, RVD, he even lost to Tensai), not lose more often. Obviously wins over Cena would still matter a lot if he were handing them out like candy. If Cena had just lost a few times before he lost to Bryan at Summerslam, think how over Bryan and so many other would have been. Top faces don't lose and when they do, it is rarely clean (Austin in 1999 was nearly god like, losing clean twice and one was in a triple threat match). Obviously Vince has no control over this Make-A-Wish, never take a day off monster. I feel like you personally hate him for your misguided view over what putting someone over means. Cena is about to lose to Lesnar. Lesnar can sure pass that torch in one of his 2-3 matches a year. Plus Cena is only 37. He isn't in jobbing age yet. One thing you have to understand is Rock and Austin only last a few years. That wasn't WWE's choice. Austin's neck died and Rock left. If they hadn't, they would have been on top for a long, long time just like Cena.
If you don't like his TV character, fine. But blatantly ignoring the massive positive impact he has had on wrestling is stupid. Ignoring all the people he put over. His excellent promo skills. His playing to the crowd skills (which more guys really need to do). Cena is a great wrestler. To say otherwise is wrong. You can say that in your opinion, he sucks. But then you would be wrong.
What about Bryan beating HHH, Batista and Orton in the same night? I mean that's just like SuperCena or some other stupid bullshit right (because no other face has ever overcome the odds, only Cena and no one else)? How about Punk kicking out of THREE Attitude Adjustments at MITB a few years ago?
Moving onto the topic of the thread. Why is everyone so sure Undertaker is coming back? The streak was the entire point of him coming back. I'm sure losing the streak, means he is retired. Why would they bring Taker back to lose again? That would make Brock's win mean a lot less. There would not be a big draw to it anymore. There wouldn't be any point to it.
That report of Taker working out in the gym again could just mean he wants to stay in shape. So I don't get why people think that means he is coming back.
