danny_the_legend_killer
Occasional Pre-Show
So we all know that on 2/21/11 we saw the big return of the undertaker after weeks of ominous promos and the possibility of sting coming to the wwe which didn't happen and the undertaker returned but was interrupted by a returning triple h which resulted in a feud over the streak, and once wrestlemania was done with they both went away again.
But the point of this thread is too ask why when the undertaker returned did he not address the fact that kane had firstly left him in "a vegetative state" as he never did get any payback on kane or the face that Paul Bearer had double crossed him and cost him the world title or the fact that the nexus or even Wade Barrett who was likely to be behind the attack as he was the leader?
or did i miss any of the above mentioned things or did the wwe just forget about the whole and book taker vs hhh the make mania look better?
But the point of this thread is too ask why when the undertaker returned did he not address the fact that kane had firstly left him in "a vegetative state" as he never did get any payback on kane or the face that Paul Bearer had double crossed him and cost him the world title or the fact that the nexus or even Wade Barrett who was likely to be behind the attack as he was the leader?
or did i miss any of the above mentioned things or did the wwe just forget about the whole and book taker vs hhh the make mania look better?