Top 5 Superstars who needs to retire soon

Heartbreak_Kid_707

Championship Contender
Hey guys, most lists will be the same.. But I'm just curious the order. Cout down from 5 to 1 about who on WWE's active roster about who needs to retire (with 1 being the most) and a short reason why you think they should....GO!!

5) R-Truth. I think he's well past his glass ceiling . I don't see him ever getting better. Or a run with any kind of belt.

4) mark Henry. He's way past his prime and potential. We've been hinted before about his retirement. And no way he will be in any major storyline, defiantly no belts. He's the new job squad...

3) Big Show. I cannot watch a match of his. Hes horribly slow and can't carry a match hisself. He's been a member of my job squad. I can't stand the guy with anything to do with wrestling.

2) Undertaker.. His age is getting up there. Although he has went from 1 match a year to what, HIAC will make his 3rd so far. His health needs to be taking a toll with all his falls.

1) of course Sting. He's 56 and even though he looked good most of the night, he obviously took his toll on it. If his neck is as bad as first thought then there shouldn't be any discussion.

Honorable mentions...HHH, and after this run Kane..
 
Kane
Big Show
Sting
Undertaker
Jerry Lawler

Undertaker still has value because everyone loves seeing him but besides that these guys need to hang up their boots. Lawler doesn't compete often but he should retire as a commentator.
 
Not to be down in this thread as it could be a decent discussion but going for the five you have mentioned

5. R-Truth - Still a good worker and has been around. Can help teach younger, greener talent in the ring. Does not need to retire, still several years left. Just because he perhaps doesn't have a massive future ahead of him doesn't mean he should retire. He has a lot to offer. Going on your theory of why he should retire others such as Zack Ryder, Adam Rose, Fandango are in this boat. All three of these could do well in other promotions. Retiring is a long way away for R-Truth. His time in WWE may be short, but you've put him in the wrong list as far as retiring is concerned.

4. Mark Henry - I kind of agree with this but as with him and your number 3 pick, Big Show, these guys can still put others over. Yes they may not be the best in the ring and are by no means mobile. But seeing someone pick up one of these guys is still pretty impressive. Again both can be used for putting over other guys given their size.

2 and 1. Undertaker and Sting - Both have proved recently they can still go. Without the unfortunate injury to sting at NOC I would have expected him to be on Raw to possibly put over Rollins a bit. You have two absolute legends in the wrestling business and if they are willing to go, and have proven they can still go, it's ridiculous not to use that for the benefit of others. Are they as good as they were? Probably not, and I think with everyone on this list you either don't like them anymore or don't like them as much as you used to, and for that reason you seem to think they should retire. Stepping back from where they once were to help the business is totally different from retirement.

Think you should rename this thread, people I don't want to see anymore
 
Jerry Lawler- How long can one go through the motions?! Literally does nothing to entertain or help the product.
Big Show- I get he's 7ft. 400+ pounds and an attraction. But that attraction has lost any "must see in person" appeal years ago. Nothing left to prove. Hang up and get in the HOF
Kane- we've seen the same thing for far too long. Same as big show. Retire, HOF bound.
Mark Henry- Hurt too often and lost all "bad ass" "hall of pain" appeal.
Vince- Step down and let Triple H have his go! Time to shake things up!
 
1. Sting - unlike the poster above, I don't think he's shown that he can still get it done. He may work in some low impact short matches, but that's about it. He's 56 - there's no shame in that. He's a legend, but even legends run out of steam at some point. Pitting him against the likes of Rollins was a tremendous mistake.

2. Undertaker - Heel turn at this point is just silly, and quite frankly the "low blow" Taker isn't a Taker I want to see. He should either be "the man", or he should hang 'em up if he can't be (and I don't think he can really perform with the likes of Lesnar anymore anyway). Knock off two birds with one stone: Taker vs Sting at whatever PPV they can both get up for, let them pound on each other for a couple of minutes, have one or the other win, and both announce their retirements.

3. The Miz - I just don't find his schtick entertaining anymore. He's NEVER getting out of midcard hell again. He should stick around to do Miz TV because he IS somewhat fun to watch for that...but I don't really ever need to see him wrestle again.

4. Daniel Bryan - I know this one is controversial, and it's not that I don't enjoy watching the guy's ring work. He's fun to watch and he does a great job and is a VERY hard worker clearly. However he's frail - and he's a small man in a big man's world. He's now had two long-term type injuries that have kept him out for substantial lengths of time, and as much as I enjoy watching the guy, I'd rather he be able to go on to enjoy things besides wrestling than risk getting hurt again. Concussions and neck injuries are nothing to screw around with.

5. Big Show - Dude can barely move. I realize he's enormous and for a man that size moving is tough, but he's gotten very noticeably slower in recent years...and quite frankly, he's got the dumbest finishing move of all time. His character is annoying, his interaction with both other superstars and the crowd is irritating, and honestly he's just not a polarizing character. I don't find him entertaining as a heel...and at the end of the day that's the biggest failing for a heel.

Honorable mentions: Anybody regularly appearing on WWE Superstars, but not on Raw/Smackdown. Let's be honest - NOTHING happens on Superstars and nobody really bothers watching it. I watch Raw/Smackdown pretty religiously, but couldn't even tell you time/channel for Superstars because I haven't watched in so long.
 
I don't agree with anyone that posters have said. You need experience on the roster for the newer guys coming up.

R-Truth while he may never have a run with another title, is good enough and entertaining enough to be a talent enhancement. If someone is at a loose end then a feud with Truth wouldn't be a bad thing. Plus he can take a loss and it doesn't affect him.

Big Show. The guy bugs the crap out of me but understand why he's still there. If the Authority wants to teach someone a lesson and hand out a squash match, they look to him to do it. He's not that old, but he shouldn't be main eventing anything anymore.

Mark Henry is in the same boat as Big Show. He's a veteran that has had a good run, and we don't see him often enough to warrant wanting him to go.

Kane seems to have new life breathed into him and this feud with Rollins has been in the making for the better part of a year now. It's been pretty obvious that they were going to go at it for a long time. I don't mind Kane all that much, the only thing that bothers me is the fact he interferes in almost every match, and main events too many RAW's and PPV's. As a teacher to the newer guys, he's invaluable to the company.

Jerry Lawler can go at any time. I much prefer Bryan Saxton as part of the team, he just seems to try a little harder. Unfortunately Lawler has a job for life, and we're not going to get rid of him anytime soon. He was sort of demoted somewhat with the move to Smackdown, but still having him on the PPV's is a pain.

Those wrestlers that can go for me are people like Famdango, Heath Slater an some of the other lower midcard. But the WWE needs jobbers and I guess they will be kept as well. Haven't seen either one of them in a substantial feud in forever.
 
Think you should rename this thread, people I don't want to see anymore

That would be more accurate. I've looked at all the names suggested in this thread and don't feel any of 'em should retire if they don't want to.....as long as they are still able to fill a purpose in WWE.

If old-timers like Big Show and Mark Henry weren't amenable to jobbing and putting over younger talent, WWE management would surely let them know they've worn out their welcome......but when these good fellas are realistic enough to understand how their services would best benefit the company, I see no reason to force them out.

As it is, they get to appear fearsome, which is necessary if they are to have value as stepping stones. Did I like having Big Show go cleanly over Cesaro the other night? No, but it shouldn't be interpreted that Show is getting any kind of push; as far as I can see, the reason for his victory was to make him appear a more viable opponent for Brock Lesnar. Wanting Show to retire so he won't block the efforts of a guy like Cesaro is counterproductive in terms of what's best for business.

Forcing people to pack it in? If guys like Henry or Show decide they want one more title run......and make too much noise while doing it......you'll see how fast they're put out to pasture.
 
Good thread.

1. Top billing has to go to the Big Show. His legacy will be great. He has many accolades and has enough charisma to forever last in the minds of two different generations of wrestling fans, but it's time to go. Un-Bo-Lievable Jeff said that he can still put people over but I disagree. Fans are legitimately tired of Paul Wight: it's not his gimmick, not the fact he's a heel (or is he a babyface now? He changes every month so I lost track), it's the man himself. Literally nothing that they do with him will make people interested. I was at SummerSlam this year and let me tell you my entire section (which was a 100 section) left for beer/bathroom as soon as they heard his theme. He has nothing left to prove, and unfortunately for him nothing left to offer.

2. Mark Henry - I wasn't really ever on the Hall of Pain Train, but that run gave me some entertainment on the mic. He has never had a good match in his life, and is by far the worst wrestler who fell victim to The Streak. At this point, maybe he can put some people over, he still gets a good reaction is obviously a big guy. At 44, I simply feel like he's nothing more than enhancement talent. That's fine, but if I'm him I probably would rather retire with some pride than be relegated to a joke for several more years.

3. Daniel Bryan - I never would've even thought of him, but wweguru makes a good point: no matter how much DB and WWE Universe (including myself) chant YES! YES! YES! It looks like his body is saying NO! NO! NO! Just like Kobe Bryant in the NBA we've seen back to back year-ending injuries occur to a top guy who has quite clearly dedicated his entire life to this craft. Both started so young and fought so hard get to the top, but safety should always come first. For Edge it was a no-brainer, and although Kobe is trying to have "one last year" I don't think Bryan should unless he tailors his move set. Since Bryan has gone on record to specifically say he would not tailor is move set around safety, I think it's best to ride off into the sunset with the ability to walk.

4. Undertaker - He would've been number 2 if I didn't attend SummerSlam this year. I haven't been interested in the idea of Taker match since WM29, and I haven't been entertained by one since WM27. He's looks so old and terrible, he moves so slow and feeble, his gimmick has now been of someone old and "losing it" for years. Going to SummerSlam and seeing how many people were specifically there to see him and so emotionally and financially invested in him made me realize he's still a cash cow, even in his old age. I'll never forget an interview he did in 2003 where he criticized Hogan and Flair for "hanging on too long after their primes" and vowed to go out on top so that people will only remember him in his best shape. Fast forward 12 years and he's literally the face of the "Holding on Too Long" club.

5. Natalya - Another controversial choice, Nattie Neidhart is the best female wrestler in the world today. She was also the best female wrestler in the world in 2010 and all of the years in-between. However, I don't think any WWE Universe member would put her in their top 3, which is a direct result of how poorly her entire career was booked. The first ever 3rd generation diva; with so much charisma, legitimate ring ability and a pretty face should've been a golden goose for WWE. She should've been the Uncle Bret Hart of the Divas division, receiving mention among Lita, Trish, and Moolah. Instead, they've made her mostly her husband's valet and gave her a farting gimmick. I don't think she should retire from wrestling but she should definitely retire from WWE. She's about 33 so she probably doesn't have many years left if she's going to start a family with Tyson (and women generally retire in their mid-30s) so she should spend those years getting the respect she deserves. Tyson deserves better too, maybe move them to ROH or New Japan or something, but this whole shit of her "missing out on the Divas Revolution" is disrespect: she should be out there battling with the 4 Horsewomen (Charlotte, Becky, Sasha, Bayley) every night.

As for Kane, Sting, HHH, and R-Truth: I see no reason for any to retire. Kane is still very over, and has been really good in the authority although I do think his ring work has been lackluster for a couple of years. Sting, the Icon, is obviously massively over and provides many dream match opportunities. He still looks the part and can go in the ring so really the only thing people have to talk about is his age, which shouldn't be the end all be all. Hunter is probably in the best shape of all 4 of these men, and with him only working once a year now I can honestly see him performing at a high level well into his 50's. As for Truth, he's a great enhancement talent that still provides a lot of entertainment and can put on a good match in the ring.
 
Big Show
Kane
Mark Henry
R-Truth
Vince McMahon

Show, Kane, and Henry are all monsters (really old & stale monsters at that). Just because you're tall and/or fat doesn't mean I or anyone else should care about you.

R-Truth shows up every now and buries King Barrett. That's about all he knows how to do. Please stop.

Vince McMahon is out of touch with society. Royal Rumble 2015, New Day as faces, Cena's dominance, and so much more proves this.

There's a lot more, but these are the Top 5.
 
Kane
Big Show
Sting
Undertaker

The reason being that Kane and Show regularly take up a lot of time on Raw. Especially Kane. Waste of time.

Taker and Sting will wrestle in prominent matches whenever they do wrestle.....those slots would be better served going to younger guys. We've seen everything these two have to offer, and they are just too old. I don't want to see Sting get seriously injured on my tv like I did the other night. Not good at all.

Henry and Truth don't wrestle enough for me to actively root for them to retire.

But those other 4 have to go. It's amazing the the WWE still tries to rely on these guys to draw viewers. Move on and make more new stars. The roster is loaded with talent.
 
I'm going to be the minority and say I don't think any of those guys should retire untill they themselves are ready to retire. If it was up to some of the IWC most of those guys mentioned would have retired about 15 years ago with us missing out on so many great legendry matches. This obsession with some only wanting constantly to see very young wrestlers is in my view quite disturbing but to each their own.
I imagine these guys approaching their late 50s as old and frail as you claim them to be are still a thousand times fitter than any of you are in your 20s yes injuries happen like Sting a couple of days ago but injured wrestlers aren't just exclusive to older wrestlers. Watching the match I hold the opinion the injury was more on Seth Rollins inexperiance of doing the move it was on him to protect the landing of his oponent and not just throw the guy neck first into the corner just like he broke Cena's nose recently I guess if Cena was an older wrestler it would have been his ages fault like younger people have a tougher nose.
If you hate watching any wrestlers over 25 leave the room when their match comes on is my advice lifes too short to dwell on everything that is wrong with wrestling.
 
Big Show
Jericho
Rosa
JBL
Eric Rowan


They all kill WWE TV for me when they are on

Lawler is a strong #6.. but JBL manages to be more annoying
 
Not to be down in this thread as it could be a decent discussion but going for the five you have mentioned

5. R-Truth - Still a good worker and has been around. Can help teach younger, greener talent in the ring. Does not need to retire, still several years left. Just because he perhaps doesn't have a massive future ahead of him doesn't mean he should retire. He has a lot to offer. Going on your theory of why he should retire others such as Zack Ryder, Adam Rose, Fandango are in this boat. All three of these could do well in other promotions. Retiring is a long way away for R-Truth. His time in WWE may be short, but you've put him in the wrong list as far as retiring is concerned.

4. Mark Henry - I kind of agree with this but as with him and your number 3 pick, Big Show, these guys can still put others over. Yes they may not be the best in the ring and are by no means mobile. But seeing someone pick up one of these guys is still pretty impressive. Again both can be used for putting over other guys given their size.

2 and 1. Undertaker and Sting - Both have proved recently they can still go. Without the unfortunate injury to sting at NOC I would have expected him to be on Raw to possibly put over Rollins a bit. You have two absolute legends in the wrestling business and if they are willing to go, and have proven they can still go, it's ridiculous not to use that for the benefit of others. Are they as good as they were? Probably not, and I think with everyone on this list you either don't like them anymore or don't like them as much as you used to, and for that reason you seem to think they should retire. Stepping back from where they once were to help the business is totally different from retirement.

Think you should rename this thread, people I don't want to see anymore

That's actually farthest thing from being right. That I just don't like them anymore.r-truth is entertaining but not that talented anymore

You've got me on on Henry and big show. I've not liked big show ever in wwe.

Kane, you won't find a bigger Kane fan than me. I love him and even had an online petition for him to get a title push right now.

Sting, I said for his health. Daniel Bryan I said for health reason. I have always been a sting fan. Honestly I've never ever liked D-Bry..ever..

Undertaker, what is there to say everybody loves him. Including me. So technically your wrong saying I just don't like them..
 
Undertaker most definitely because not only is it time but honestly Taker's retirement has been in the cards for a while hell he should have retired after the End of an Era Hell in a Cell Match at WrestleMania 28 when he beat Triple H to go 20-0 because what more did Taker have to prove? What more does he have to prove to us? Nothing because he's been doing this for 25 years now a quarter century in this business
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top