ThE cErEbRaL aSsAsIn
Getting Noticed By Management
iam not saying thats the only reason there others like shark boy and no dialog and the same old sting and jj crap but people like aj and daniels save it i wach it for them 2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
ThE cErEbRaL aSsAsIn said:iam not saying thats the only reason there others like shark boy and no dialog and the same old sting and jj crap but people like aj and daniels save it i wach it for them 2
ok all those do suck ecept kevin thorn its good for sci-fi but any way shark boy is way worst and there dialog sounds like there readinggamehead said:shark Boy is a jobber so he isn't important and the WWE has way worst gimmick's like Jillian Hall and her old mole, Simon Dean's fitness gimmick, Booker T's "King" gimmick, Vito's cross-dresser gimmick, Matt Stirker's teacher gimmick, Umaga's bootleg Samoa Joe gimmick, Kevin Thorn's vampire gimmick etc. wrestling is about putting great matches like what TNA does and not about dialog and besides TNA is starting to have more dialong. And Sting and Jeff Jarrets fued is almost over
gamehead said:shark Boy is a jobber so he isn't important and the WWE has way worst gimmick's like Jillian Hall and her old mole, Simon Dean's fitness gimmick, Booker T's "King" gimmick, Vito's cross-dresser gimmick, Matt Stirker's teacher gimmick, Umaga's bootleg Samoa Joe gimmick, Kevin Thorn's vampire gimmick etc. wrestling is about putting great matches like what TNA does and not about dialog and besides TNA is starting to have more dialong. And Sting and Jeff Jarrets fued is almost over
That's the point of Shark Boy's gimmick. It's a throwback gimmick. You're supposed to laugh at it. Kevin Thorn is decent in the ring, but isn't good enough to denote getting to job over Al Snow. His gimmick is just as one-dimensional as Shark Boy. The only difference is that Shark Boy's gimmick is somewhat original. Kevin Thorn needs to realize that Gangrel called from the year 1999 and wants his gimmick back.ESeeDubbya said:I'm sorry, but there is no worse gimmick than Shark Boy's.
And Kevin Thorn makes up for his bad gimmick with his cool wrestling style.
Triple J is their go-to heel. He's just like Jean Paul and Kurt Angle were for the WWE for a few years straight. That's one of the reasons they're doing this. You are approaching this as a mark. You want the title off of him, therefore you have heat on him. His plan is working. Don't worry, though, Jarrett is getting down to the end of his career. Let's just hope TNA has a stable heel who can irritate the fans as much as Jarrett can on a regular basis. TNA is just doing what works and riding a top heel for as long as they can.carolinadude said:Jeff Jarrett beating Sting. Damn, I'm starting to agree that TNA sucks. For kissing Triple J's ass so much. A large amount of his heel heat has nothing to do with promos or ring work. People boo because they are tired of seeing him constantly on top. Period. I heard after the match, that the crowd gave off no heat, almost dead, walking out of the arena.
I know this comment's a few days late, but that match ending was complete bullshit. Sting should have walked away with the title and maybe then eventually put over Samoa Joe. Anyone but Jarrett already. Jarrett needs to be dropped, NOW.
Kasey said:Triple J is their go-to heel. He's just like Jean Paul and Kurt Angle were for the WWE for a few years straight. That's one of the reasons they're doing this. You are approaching this as a mark. You want the title off of him, therefore you have heat on him. His plan is working. Don't worry, though, Jarrett is getting down to the end of his career. Let's just hope TNA has a stable heel who can irritate the fans as much as Jarrett can on a regular basis. TNA is just doing what works and riding a top heel for as long as they can.
tna_and_ecw_rocks I suck vinces dick like you always do asshole you must like 60 year old male asses and male chearleaders your a ******[/QUOTE said:shut up ******
Understandable. Each to his own. I've been hunting down ROH DVD's like mad and have about six of them. You're right, Jarrett is still a pretty solid wrestler, but I also think he doesn't try half as much as he did during his late 90's stint with WCW. He knows he's in a safe position in the company and doesn't try to do anything close to what his old performances were like. As much of a Sting fan as I am, I honestly think Sting hasn't been half what he was since his big hiatus in '96. I realized this when I watched his Starrcade '88 tag match w/Dusty Rhodes when they took on The Road Warriors (he was high-flying and amazing in those days). Sting is another one who plays it safe in the ring and doesn't try to innovate anymore. It's like Shawn Michaels...I can pick out what moves they're going to do in sequence in almost every match. It really sucks when a guy gets too over and doesn't have to try to please the audience, because they'll root for him (or boo) anyway.carolinadude said:Point is that it's too long. I actually watch it a lot less, now. If I watch anything, it's old tapes or indies. Difference with Kurt and JP is that at least they remained somewhat entertaining and had good promos. Jarrett got boring a long time ago. If they shoved Spanky down our throats constantly (when so many others were capable of taking that top heel spot, if given somewhat of a chance), I'd be tired too. I'm not saying Jarrett's not a good wrestler, but not THAT damn good. I heard the fans reaction after the match spoke for itself, but I wasn't there.
Kasey said:Understandable. Each to his own. I've been hunting down ROH DVD's like mad and have about six of them. You're right, Jarrett is still a pretty solid wrestler, but I also think he doesn't try half as much as he did during his late 90's stint with WCW. He knows he's in a safe position in the company and doesn't try to do anything close to what his old performances were like. As much of a Sting fan as I am, I honestly think Sting hasn't been half what he was since his big hiatus in '96. I realized this when I watched his Starrcade '88 tag match w/Dusty Rhodes when they took on The Road Warriors (he was high-flying and amazing in those days). Sting is another one who plays it safe in the ring and doesn't try to innovate anymore. It's like Shawn Michaels...I can pick out what moves they're going to do in sequence in almost every match. It really sucks when a guy gets too over and doesn't have to try to please the audience, because they'll root for him (or boo) anyway.
I'd still take these two PROVEN veterans who are nearing the end of their road against two-move wonders like Batista and Cena.NooDLE said:TNA Sucks!!
First problem is their champion: Jeff Jarrett, he sucks. Him and Sting feuding for the NWA title.. horrible, they both suck. They should put some guys with actual wrestling ability in the main event, and fire these two... quick!
Nothing but spot monkeys who can keep crowds entertained throughout an entire show (even the three hour PPVs). This is the kind of lame defense WWE marks like to use when they justify liking boring crap in a ring. Not saying I don't like SOME of what goes on in WWE, but it's pathetic that for ninety minutes of airtime, you can only find thirty minutes of it to be quality wrestling. The rest of it is filler tripe that doesn't belong on cable access. Even on Mondays, no less. Why do you think the World Title Matches are the main event at PPVs? Because they're second string to the other belts? At least TNA doesn't have to pipe in crowd chants on their tapings.NooDLE said:I hear alot of people saying their wrestling is way better than WWE, 'just watch the X divison!' The X divison is nothing but spot monkeys, it can be entertaining, but the spots they do are just too much. The business revolves around this title, it should be revolbing around the Heavyweight title.. get it right TNA!
Yeah, they have Benoit and Angle. Who've been misused for the last two years. HBK is only as good as Angle makes him. Triple H buried the main event at Wrestlemania 21 (funny that they couldn't pipe in crowd noise during that one) and he porks the bosses daughter. Flair should've retired in the mid-nineties. Stone Cold isn't even wrestling and is DONE. The Rock got smart and jumped ship before it began sinking. And the Undertaker? He's about as phenomenal in the ring as Billy Ray Cyrus is on the microphone. Jarrett may be old and overused, but at least he regularly scoops heat and can still move around the ring and sell.NooDLE said:I do not believe in any way that TNA is better than the WWE in wrestling. Does TNA have technical masterminds like Chris Benoit or Kurt Angle? NO! Do they have people like HBK, HHH, Flair, Stone Cold, The Rock, The Undertaker? Dont think so... these people were some of the greatest! Who does TNA have... former WWE superstar Jeff Jarrett.. great.
Spirit Squad Hooray! I have an idea for WWE's next storyline. How about we re-release a tamed version of a gimmick from 1997 and have them dump poop on Vince McMahon. Pure genius. Oh, while we're at it, we can have Triple H make little allusions as to the fact he humps Stephanie McMahon...further asserting that the best way to get and keep yourself on the top is to sleep your way there. Classic.[/QUOTE]NooDLE said:Also, the storylines on TNA are pure garbage. They need to do something about that... get some creativity or something.. But the storylines need alot of work.
WWE stopped innovating toward the hind end of the Clinton administration. They had a three year window with no competition on American TV and they pissed it down the drain. Leave it them to blow the biggest crossover event in wrestling history and limp on from there.NooDLE said:Overall, WWE is definately the bette product. They have the wrestling, the storylines, and overall more entertaining federation.