It's a pointless poll. You want us to compare 4 years of TNA to 53 years of WWF?
Fine. As I see it, TNA has given four solid years. They have, in those four years, refined and polished their product. Things are only looking up for that promotion.
WWF, in 53 years, has had many, many ups; they have had a WHOLE lot of downs. Ever since Vince Sr. retired and VKM took over, the WWF has been on a decline, both in terms of quality and creativity. The 80's (thanks to Hogan) initiated a new high for the WWF that lasted a short time, then the decline returned. The "Attitude Era" brought about a resurgence in popularity, then the slump returned. When will the next surge come?
Therefore, I have to conclude that, since I've been roughly 98% satisfied with the TNA product in the last 4 years, and only about 65% satisfied with the WWF product in the last 53 years, TNA is better.