The srteak 20 and tainted?

[Moon Knight]

They also say Triple H challenged Undertaker for the first time in 2011 soooo.....

Why does everybody seem to forget that HHH said he wrestled Undertaker before at Wrestlemania the very next RAW. Seems to never be mentioned.

 

[Natural Selection]

Why does everybody seem to forget that HHH said he wrestled Undertaker before at Wrestlemania the very next RAW. Seems to never be mentioned.

Link?

 

[Nate DaMac]

Link?

It is true. Find the link yourself. Or look up KB's review, pretty sure he mentions it there too.

 

[ヒュー　G.　レックション]

That's the Raw after the Mania match though when HHH says that. Before that they were hyping it up as if they'd never faced before. I think that's what Killjoy was getting at.

 

[Барбоса]

I might have been tempted to somewhat agree with the OP had Undertaker won due to an ally of his attacking him on purpose to get Giant Gonzalez DQ-ed. However, the fact that Gonzalez hit Taker with everything he had be still could not beat the Deadman, leading to him using chloroform in an act of frustration/desperation (and Taker still came back for more) means that there is no tainting of that victory.

In the end, no matter the circumstances, the Undertaker won at Wrestlemania IX.

 

[FunKay the Inevitable]

He did not lose. Therefore he is undefeated. Its complex, I know, but try to follow me here...

I'm in a library as I read this and I'm trying so very hard not to laugh as loud as possible. I owe you some more green Norcs.