achromat666
Pre-Show Stalwart
Everyone complaining about Rusev possibly losing to Cena....you do realize this is a soap opera, that bad guys are created to wreak havoc on the good guys and ultimately the good guys triumph in the end, otherwise the audience hates the product and quits watching.
The fact WWE gave Rusev a win over Cena at FastLane is a huge bonus for him, and give Cena credit, he's a company guy who loses when asked (think Hulk Hogan gives that loss ). Yes, it's to build to a W-Mania match with Cena winning but you have to see the forest for the trees.... 1) Cena's match will be among the four biggest on the card, likely tied with Taker-Wyatt and just underneath Sting-HHH & Lesnar-Reigns in terms of importance to the card's promotion 2) If you are working with Cena in that scenario and are allowed to have a strong showing even in a loss it's a great thing for you.
fans get so hung up on wins and losses....it's how you are portrayed over all in the storylines and how competitive the match itself is that matters, much more than actually winning. Otherwise Randy Savage wouldn't be a HOFer, he'd be a slightly more memorable version of George South, the prominent career jobber in the NWA and AWA, after all, Savage spent most of his first two years in WWE getting beaten by Steamboat and Hogan, at least in match results, yet he was portrayed in such a way that he was ELEVATED in the minds of the audience. Same with Sting vs Ric Flair, Sting became a sensation and hugely popular star based largely on the fact that he came really close to beating Flair in great matches without actually winning. Think about that for a minute. It was years before he won a meaningful match vs Flair and in the end lost more high profile bouts between the two than he won, yet that feud made him a superstar.
Edge's work with John Cena took him from tag team guy and mid carder to full blown lead heel and main eventer, a major elevation for him as a legit top tier singles star, although he lost most of their matches.
If Rusev is promoted strong going into the match and after the event and especially if he is given the chance to have a strong showing in their actual Mania bout he will get a huge boost from this, even if he loses to Cena.
My issue has nothing to do with whether he loses to Cena or someone else, it's the value that has been placed on his undefeated streak. The point of my OP has nothing to do with Cena. It has everything to do with how monsters with Undefeated streaks are typically booked, and how badly they're generally handled after the streak is done.
Yes a match with Cena at WM is a big rub for Rusev, but what will they do with him afterwards? I don't see a long feud with Cena and he's beaten most everyone else on the roster. Undefeated streaks paint you in a corner from a booking standpoint and I have no confidence that they'll handle Rusev well once it's broken.
In this case it's not the fans that have placed the huge value on the win loss either, it's the writers. Rusev is being defined by it and while he's certainly better than the likes of Ryback who started out being booked exactly the same way they never handle talent well once that is done. They generally fall down in the card and get lost.