Simple question....I think a majority of people agree that WM 27 is at least in the lower third of the nearly 30 Manias. I've also read from many sites that having the Rock host WM didn't really effect the buy rate (I have no idea if it did or not). Let's just assume it didn't really do a whole lot for the actual buy rate for the sake of this thread. There wasn't a whole lot to look forward to or special attractions going into this Mania so it was the die-hard fans who bought the ppv, so why not just not promote a "host" for the event (which could have prevented lots of spoilers) and just open Mania with the Rock coming out as an un-promoted "hosts". Just go back and watch the Raw where they announced he was going to be the hosts and just imagine that promo as the opening (and completely un-expected) opening segment for a WrestleMania. Since it was a forgettable WM it would have at least had the most amazing opening segment of any Mania ever and something to remember it by. I mean, we got a year long build to Cena-Rock at 28 anyway, did they really have to add the 2 or 3 weeks before 27 to the hype (which looking back only made the main event of 27 more predictable before you even bought the ppv?). Does anyone agree with this or was it worth it for the extra half-million buys for WM 27?