IrishCanadian25
Going on 10 years with WrestleZone
A little background. I used to run a Live Journal site (it's down now) called "Cigar Talk," and yes, that's where the idea for "The Cigar Lounge" was derived. Cigar Talk was a blog where, each Tuesday, I posted a new debate issue and let people go on and go nuts. It was similar to a thread here.
Hottest issue ever? The concept of engagement rings, promise rings, and every other stupid pre-wedding tradition people have cooked up. And I attribute MOST of them to women.
The latest sickening transgression is the existance of the mangagement ring. That's not "management" misspelled, folks, it's an engagement ring for dudes. It's yet another way for insecure betrothed females to further urinate on their "territory," the untrustworthy, testosterone laden males.
These things are an insult. They emasculate men. They add yet another massive price tag to the already out of control (TRUST ME - recent experience!) costs of engagement and marriage.
This ridiculous new idea also has women taking the Sadie Hawkins bullshit a step WAY over the line - some of them are proposing to the men with this ring! And of course, GETTING PISSED IF THE MAN DOESN'T WEAR THE RING! "Why don't you want to wear the ring? Don't you want people to KNOW you're engaged? You're going to the bar? Not without your ring..."
Ugh.
I want to know who feels the same way I do, not just about the Mangagement Ring, but about "Promise Rings," and every other silly norm the marriage pimps have dreamed up. I for one would dump a girl who asked me to wear a mangagement ring faster than Sunny LoSpecchio would dump a girl who didn't unlock the driver side door for him!
Hottest issue ever? The concept of engagement rings, promise rings, and every other stupid pre-wedding tradition people have cooked up. And I attribute MOST of them to women.
The latest sickening transgression is the existance of the mangagement ring. That's not "management" misspelled, folks, it's an engagement ring for dudes. It's yet another way for insecure betrothed females to further urinate on their "territory," the untrustworthy, testosterone laden males.
These things are an insult. They emasculate men. They add yet another massive price tag to the already out of control (TRUST ME - recent experience!) costs of engagement and marriage.
This ridiculous new idea also has women taking the Sadie Hawkins bullshit a step WAY over the line - some of them are proposing to the men with this ring! And of course, GETTING PISSED IF THE MAN DOESN'T WEAR THE RING! "Why don't you want to wear the ring? Don't you want people to KNOW you're engaged? You're going to the bar? Not without your ring..."
Ugh.
I want to know who feels the same way I do, not just about the Mangagement Ring, but about "Promise Rings," and every other silly norm the marriage pimps have dreamed up. I for one would dump a girl who asked me to wear a mangagement ring faster than Sunny LoSpecchio would dump a girl who didn't unlock the driver side door for him!