Slam Master
Pre-Show Stalwart
I recently read both Shawn Michaels and Bret Hart's respected autobiographies, and it has recently changed my view on my perspective of pro wrestling. For one, Bret Hart is not under contract so there isn't anybody looking over his shoulder on what to and what not to say. His book points out Shawn as a whiny, crying, insecure, neurotic drug addict. He also points out how Shawn said right to Bret 4 days before SS97 that he'd be thankful for Bret to put Shawn over but wouldn't return the favor. Then later that day in front of Vince Shawn totally changed his tune. He made HBK to be the instigator and the backstabber in many situations, which probably was true at the time. Bret also stated that Shawn was a prick to everyone backstage and that him and HHH were on the booking committee running other stars down. This seems very asshole-ish and realistic, knowing what hard prescription drugs and alcohol can do to someone. Bret is very old-school, and would get pissed when Shawn and those guys would break kayfabe and do things unprofessionally, doing shoots bashing the real-life Bret as opposed to Bret bashing the in-ring character the Heartbreak Kid.
On Shawn's POV, he makes Bret out to be selfish and greedy, not wanting to give up the top spot. He also points out that the WWF was going in a new, reality-based edgy direction, too which wasn't to Hart's liking. Some of the things they were doing to piss Bret off were things Vince supported, and they all played the role in Bret Hart's downfall. They both couldn't co-exist constantly at each other's throats.
I'm a die-hard HBK fan, and he's the only reason I still watch, but seeing as Bret wasn't all messed up on painkillers and downers all the time, I'd have to believe Bret's side a tad more. They both have admitted that they each had faults, but HBK seemed to have special treatment and was very immature. I'm glad he's the way he is now, but I think his book is a little more sugar-coated than Bret's...thoughts?
On Shawn's POV, he makes Bret out to be selfish and greedy, not wanting to give up the top spot. He also points out that the WWF was going in a new, reality-based edgy direction, too which wasn't to Hart's liking. Some of the things they were doing to piss Bret off were things Vince supported, and they all played the role in Bret Hart's downfall. They both couldn't co-exist constantly at each other's throats.
I'm a die-hard HBK fan, and he's the only reason I still watch, but seeing as Bret wasn't all messed up on painkillers and downers all the time, I'd have to believe Bret's side a tad more. They both have admitted that they each had faults, but HBK seemed to have special treatment and was very immature. I'm glad he's the way he is now, but I think his book is a little more sugar-coated than Bret's...thoughts?