Little Jerry Lawler
Sigmund Freud On Ritalin And Roids
The awarding of the Heisman Trophy is coming up soon and the race looks to be unclear as ever. Mark Ingram, Tim Tebow, Colt McCoy, C.J. Spiller, and Toby Gerhart look to be all in the running as the college football season comes to a close. The Heisman Trophy is meant to be awarded to the best collegiate football player but it be construed as the best collegiate player on the best team.
People are looking at Tebow, Ingram, and McCoy are being the front runners to win the Heisman. If I had a vote, I would give to Gerhart of Stanford. He has consistently been the best player this season. He leads the FBS in rushing with 1736 yards and rushing touchdowns with 26. What may work against him is where he plays and the lack of national attention compared to Tebow or McCoy. You can say that winning the Heisman nowadays depends on where you at instead of how good you are. McCoy and Tebow haven't had the greatest of season but it's a guarantee that they will get their share of votes based on where they are from.
So do you believe the Heisman truly stands for the best collegiate player in football or does it depend on where you play at and the attention from the national media?
People are looking at Tebow, Ingram, and McCoy are being the front runners to win the Heisman. If I had a vote, I would give to Gerhart of Stanford. He has consistently been the best player this season. He leads the FBS in rushing with 1736 yards and rushing touchdowns with 26. What may work against him is where he plays and the lack of national attention compared to Tebow or McCoy. You can say that winning the Heisman nowadays depends on where you at instead of how good you are. McCoy and Tebow haven't had the greatest of season but it's a guarantee that they will get their share of votes based on where they are from.
So do you believe the Heisman truly stands for the best collegiate player in football or does it depend on where you play at and the attention from the national media?