A Link to the Past is not the best Zelda game. it is not even in my top 5 Zelda games. It lacks in visual represenation of the events that are occuring and overall takes away the experience.
What are you even trying to say here? The visuals are so bad that you can't tell what's happening in the story? Never mind that there's dialogue via text boxes, it's pretty easy to tell that you're traveling between a light and dark world and that Ganon's a boar monster. Jesus, you act as if it's a Commodore 64 game.
A Link to The Past has been utterly forgotten by a good portion of the world. You don't hear people bring back its fame or lack of fame. A Link to The Past doesn't have that nostalgic effect and that is its downfall
.
Which is why the game has been constantly praised, referenced, copied, parodied, etc. That must also be the reason it's usually towards the top of many "Best Of" lists form both fans and critics alike. Pretty good for such an "obscure" and "forgotten" game.
It's also funny how you you claim it has no nostalgic effect when it game out an
entire generation before MK 64. I'd love to hear your reasoning on that one.
Nobody can tell me without lying that that A Link to the Past has overall better qualities then the modern games today. Hell for that matter most of the games in this tournament only got votes for due to nostalgia. This isn't a true video game tournament this is another nostalgia tournament so get through everyone's head while voting.
Storytelling? Yes, it does that a hell of a lot better than many of the games today in both style and substance. Level design? Just as brilliant then as it is now. Gameplay? Easy enough for anyone to pick up and play, from combat to item management. As far as the voting goes, voters can vote on any criteria they wish so if they want to go purely on nostalgia, they may do so.
Mario Kart has become a game that throughout the years has simply been adapted and made to look better...,
And so has Zelda. And Metroid. And Metal Gear. And most games in a long-running series, so your point?
...where you could not FIND A Link to the Past anymore. I'm nearly positive that I could find Mario Kart 64.
I found ALTTP in the same place I located MK64: The Wii's Virtual Console. Well that wasn't too difficult. Not to mention that ALTTP was re-released on the GBA. So if my math is right, ALTTP is available one more place than MK64 is, which would make it the easier game to find. Well I'll be damned.
Mario Kart overall has left a better impression on the gaming universe and for that reason deserves to go over as the better game.
Considering that Super Mario Kart started the series and invented kart racer in general, I'd say that game left a bigger mark than MK64 ever did.
Don't get suckered into voting for A Link to the Past due to nostalgia but instead look to Mario Kart has the overall better game. Realize that it topples a Link to the Past in playability, accessability, graphics, you name it.
Because Mario Kart 64 is such a modern game
I'm not hating on Mario Kart. It was a great game, and I have many fond memories of it. But it is not the better than A Link to the Past.
Playability: Both are easy to play, but the Mario Kart 64 can be pretty imbalanced from annoying catch-up AI to some questionable track design.
Accessibility: They're about even really.
Graphics: The clean, crisp visuals of ALTTP or Mario Kart's rough, jaggy 3D models and muddled textures that only a nostalgic mother can love? Yeah, I'll take Zelda. If you really think otherwise you're either blind or believe 3D automatically means better because most games from the N64/PS era have aged horribly. Many SNES games, haven't aged a day.
Vote: The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past.