The Cabin in the Woods

TSG

Too Sweet To Be Sour
My friends all decided to see this tonight, so I tagged along. Probably the least favorite movie I have seen in awhile. I'm not a horror movie fan anyway, but the movie just seemed to be un-entertaining. The story itself wasn't a bad concept, but it's portrayal did not entertain me hardy any. Fran Kranz was the highlight of this film to me. He had a very entertaining character and portrayed it to a "T".

Anyone else see this?
 
It got incredibility high scores on Rotten Tomatoes, 93% on teh Tomatometer, & 81% of the audience liked it. Plus it's a Joss Wedon joint, so I'll likely be checking it out sometime soon.

Drag Me To Hell sucked dick, fucking terrible movie
 
Being poor has prevented me from seeing "Cabin in the Woods", but being a devotee to the Church of Whedon, I will surely be purchasing it eventually.
 
The story was pretty good in my opinion. There was a strong string of gore towards the end along with the finish that lowered it in my opinion. The first part was relatively entertaining, actually.
 
Being poor has prevented me from seeing "Cabin in the Woods", but being a devotee to the Church of Whedon, I will surely be purchasing it eventually.

Tell me about it, been waiting to see this one since I found out it was a Whedon film, forgot it was opening this weekend. I may have to try and scrounge up some extra cash this weekend so I can get to my local theater.
 
Rotten Tomatoes have a very odd way of judging movies. I usually end up disagreeing with the scores they get. For better, or for worse.

With that said, I saw American Reuinon tonight, that was a great movie.
 
Was Drag Me To Hell supposed to be a comedy? It seems like they were going for horror then halfway said fuck it and tried to make it funny

It's a Sam Raimi film :shrug:

The Evil Dead trilogy started out as horror then ended up comedy. Spiderman 3 was so bad it became funny. Just because something is heavily promoted to fit in with a certain genre or style, doesn't mean they can't incorporate different styles or ideas from other genres.
 
High RT (which usually correlates well with my enjoyment) + Joss Whedon (which ALWAYS correlates well with my enjoyment) would probably lead to me seeing it if I had any real interest in a horror film right now. Perhaps a rental/Netflix somewhere down the road.
 
I've been invited to see it tonight. I'm in two minds about it. May as well, I suppose.

I enjoyed the second half of Drag Me To Hell - which is all I've seen of it - but I worship at the altar of Raimi and got pretty much what I was expecting.
 
From what I hear it's more of a commentary on the genre and its tendencies than a horror film within itself. But then, it's Joss Wheden, so it can't just be normal can it?
 
[Heel] Green Ranger;3845012 said:
From what I hear it's more of a commentary on the genre and its tendencies than a horror film within itself. But then, it's Joss Wheden, so it can't just be normal can it?

.....And that's why every sane human being should love the greatness that is Joss.
 
[Heel] Green Ranger;3845012 said:
From what I hear it's more of a commentary on the genre and its tendencies than a horror film within itself. But then, it's Joss Wheden, so it can't just be normal can it?

What this movie is is an fucking crazy awesome fun time, I just got back from seeing it & I had a blast watching. The ending is fucking insane in an amazing awesome fun kinda way.
 
Agreed with Justin... the film was fucking awesome.

The movie Funny Games wanted to get across the same message this movie did but ended up failing miserably. The Cabin in the Woods was able to point out the flaws and ridiculousness the American horror genre has gone since the eighties without being pretentious and self-righteous while also still providing a highly entertaining flick. Simply brilliant, and a ton of fun.
 
I must have missed the message on this, someone care to explain? Maybe I'd enjoy it more if I understood.
 
It was a genre deconstruction and meta analysis of (American) horror movies. Don't get me wrong, if you only take it for face value the movie still works pretty well, however much of the pointed commentary and subtext are lost.

I really saw the film as a challenge to horror movie makers and the horror audience at large. It was homage and indictment all at once. Whedon et al. believes the current system is broken –so much so that it may not even be fixable and it might be time to just scrap it all and try something new. That was the story that was told.

On one level the movie takes themes and concepts from Whedon's earlier works on the small screen and simply places them in a new and possibly expanded context (much like the sequel—that's not a true sequel—The Wicker Tree). Ancient, almost Lovecraftian Gods, Hellmouths, government involvement and acceptance of the supernatural, etc. Certainly they are "to be continued" ideas that Whedon hasn't quite found suitable answers to and will probably continue to toy with for a while anyway.

Then on the "meta" level it's straight up commentary.

My interpretation: We the jaded, "seen it all" horror movie audience are the "ancient gods". We are to be offered sacrifice. This sacrifice are movies themselves as consumable product. Said sacrifice must follow our specific cultural clichés. And while the ante certainly has been upped over the years—so-called "torture porn" and the like—we still expect what we expect and the sacrifice must not deviate too far. We are to be assuaged and made complacent. Thus, we are lulled back to sleep, at least for a little while, 'til our base appetites stirs once more.

The government "Puppeteers" (for lack of better description) are the directors and writers who in this case are figuratively and literally altering the narrative to force an outcome. They realize that though they control the puppets (the actors), We, the audience, control them. Or at least they are afraid we do. In fact, so much so that they will try their damnedest to give us what they (and we) think we want to see. For we can make or break their very careers, which as far as they are concerned might as well be their very existence. Now it's gotten to the point of rote repetition and blind allegiance to genre rules and stereotypes ensuring a sacrifice the will be palatable. Caught in the middle, they've done this for so long they've practically forgotten the 'whys'. Now it's just another job that puts food on the table (and baby-proof locks on the cabinets apparently).

And of course there are the puppets. Thoughtful and multidimensional people who, by way of the puppeteers and our expectations, are reduced to archetypes and storyline cannon fodder. They'll alter their looks, dumb themselves down, whatever it takes to fit into the preconceived notions that the role requires. And boy do we love to watch them get slaughtered just for following the rules we set up and force them to abide by (that last bit could be taken even further to our cannibal celebrity culture as well).

In the end, it all comes crashing down. And from that chaos Whedon hopes something new and better will come and take its place. I for one hope that's the case. But then again meet the new boss…

At least that's my first viewing idea of the flick. I might go see it again with other friends and see what they thought. Definitely a thumbs up and it gives me great hope for The Avengers.

Oh, and finally there are numerous jokes/references to cult and mainstream horror movies sprinkled throughout. If you're a horror movie fan of any kind that should be a welcomed nod and be entertaining in and of itself.
 
On face value, it's a genre deconstruction. I don't know what sort of idiot you'd have to be to miss it. The sort of idiot that misses District 9 being an apartheid analogy.
 
I guess you'd be surprised then Sam. Far too many of the people leaving the theater along side me were left scratching their heads and not getting it beyond a typical hack n' slash flick. and because of that they thought it sucked…

One group of about 5–6 old ladies (wtf?) absolutely hated it and "though it was terrible" and that "they don't know how to make good movies anymore".
 
I guess you'd be surprised then Sam. Far too many of the people leaving the theater along side me were left scratching their heads and not getting it beyond a typical hack n' slash flick. and because of that they thought it sucked…

One group of about 5–6 old ladies (wtf?) absolutely hated it and "though it was terrible" and that "they don't know how to make good movies anymore".

I'm pretty sure this movie wasn't targeting the old lady demographic, & plenty of people where I lived left the movie happy & thought it was great & seemed to have a lot of fun watching it.:shrug:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,837
Messages
3,300,747
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top