A few weeks ago I posted a thread about the main event of SummerSlam 90. Now I want to talk about SummerSlam 91. I never cared for the main event at all but always overlooked it because I thought the rest of SummerSlam 91 was awesome. It would have been even more awesome with a different main event. The actual main event was Hulk Hogan and The Ultimate Warrior vs. Sgt. Slaughter, Col. Mustafa, and Gen. Adnan. I have two ideas that make SummerSlam 91 better.
The first one keeps the main event pretty much the same but with one major change. I would have preferred to see Hogan team with Sid instead of the Ultimate Warrior. Sid was involved in the main event anyway as the special referee. Just have him as Hogans partner instead. Sid hadnt made his in ring WWF debut yet and what better endorsement than being chosen as the Hulksters partner for a major ppv. The Ultimate Warrior had nothing to do with Slaughter and company. Yeah, Slaughter beat Warrior for the title at the Royal Rumble, but that was seven months earlier and a distant memory by SummerSlam. Warrior had moved on to other things. He was in the middle of a huge feud with the Undertaker and recently started one with Jake Roberts. Warrior should have wrestled one of those two instead of being put in a match that he didnt fit into. I would have preferred Jake. Jakes heel turn was pretty surprising in 1991. Jake and Warrior worked together throughout the summer of 1991 before Jake eventually turned against him. We never got a match between the two. Warrior could have just as easily worked against Taker with Jake in Takers corner. Either way Warrior should have wrestled Jake or Taker with Sid going into the main event spot.
My next idea takes Slaughter and company off the card all together. I have defended Slaughter as the right choice for the WM7 main event many times, but by SummerSlam the feud was dead. The war had been over for several months and Slaughters gimmick expired when he dropped the title at mania. There was no momentum for this match at all. It was obvious WWF was just going through the motions until they were ready for the next angle. The next big angle was Hogan vs. Undertaker so I say start it a little earlier. As I mentioned above Warrior was already feuding with both Taker and Jake. They could have started the feud between Hogan and Taker a little earlier and given us Hogan and Warrior vs. Taker and Jake at SummerSlam. That sounds a lot more interesting than continuing a dead feud with Slaughter.
For as awesome as SummerSlam 91 was I always hated the main event and found it strange that Jake and Taker were left off the card. I know they were involved in Savage and Elizabeths wedding reception, but that was not shown on ppv. Besides they still could have done that after losing to Hogan and Warrior. What do you think? Which of my ideas do you prefer? Or do you like the event as it was? Do you have a completely different idea instead?
The first one keeps the main event pretty much the same but with one major change. I would have preferred to see Hogan team with Sid instead of the Ultimate Warrior. Sid was involved in the main event anyway as the special referee. Just have him as Hogans partner instead. Sid hadnt made his in ring WWF debut yet and what better endorsement than being chosen as the Hulksters partner for a major ppv. The Ultimate Warrior had nothing to do with Slaughter and company. Yeah, Slaughter beat Warrior for the title at the Royal Rumble, but that was seven months earlier and a distant memory by SummerSlam. Warrior had moved on to other things. He was in the middle of a huge feud with the Undertaker and recently started one with Jake Roberts. Warrior should have wrestled one of those two instead of being put in a match that he didnt fit into. I would have preferred Jake. Jakes heel turn was pretty surprising in 1991. Jake and Warrior worked together throughout the summer of 1991 before Jake eventually turned against him. We never got a match between the two. Warrior could have just as easily worked against Taker with Jake in Takers corner. Either way Warrior should have wrestled Jake or Taker with Sid going into the main event spot.
My next idea takes Slaughter and company off the card all together. I have defended Slaughter as the right choice for the WM7 main event many times, but by SummerSlam the feud was dead. The war had been over for several months and Slaughters gimmick expired when he dropped the title at mania. There was no momentum for this match at all. It was obvious WWF was just going through the motions until they were ready for the next angle. The next big angle was Hogan vs. Undertaker so I say start it a little earlier. As I mentioned above Warrior was already feuding with both Taker and Jake. They could have started the feud between Hogan and Taker a little earlier and given us Hogan and Warrior vs. Taker and Jake at SummerSlam. That sounds a lot more interesting than continuing a dead feud with Slaughter.
For as awesome as SummerSlam 91 was I always hated the main event and found it strange that Jake and Taker were left off the card. I know they were involved in Savage and Elizabeths wedding reception, but that was not shown on ppv. Besides they still could have done that after losing to Hogan and Warrior. What do you think? Which of my ideas do you prefer? Or do you like the event as it was? Do you have a completely different idea instead?