I voted jeff hardy
Everyone on the list is a spot monkey to some extent, but personally i think jeff hardy is the biggest. this is because the only reason fans like him is because he takes big bumps, hes really not that good at anything else, his ring work is uninspiring and his mic skills are non-existent. So to combat these he began to take all the bad bumps in the TLC matches and now he has a reputation so everyone expects there to be a lot of spots in his matches which basically forces him to be a spot monkey. and probably is the reason why he is hooked on drugs and got suspended.
Another thing about Jeff hardy is that his spots really don't interest me, take his jump of the raw set onto Orton for instance, it took to long to set up and as soon as he started climbing the scaffolding it was obvious what he was going to do which made the actual jump an anti-climax. i prefer more innovative spots such as when Shelton Benjamin ran up the ladder and jumped out of the ring in the second MITB match. I prefer spots like these because they look spontaneous and afterwards they leave you thinking "holy shit"
How was it an anti-climax? He was climbing up, paused, then climbed up HIGHER. Even more "holy shit" worthy.
And Jeff Hardy is hardly a spot monkey. They save the big shit for important events. He's gotten much better at doing matches in the ring and has had many solid bouts with opponents ever since he's returned.
His matches with Umaga, his tag matches with Matt against MNM and others, his match against Hunter, his match against HBK, Orton, I think the Jericho match also got a good deal of praise.
The term "spot monkey" should be solely reserved for those wrestlers who ONLY rely on spot after spot, with little to no regard for any psychology in the matches. Most of those guys in this poll would be exempt from such terms if someone looked at this in an objective manner.
The Briscoes are a SHINING EXAMPLE of the term spot monkeys. I mean, I dig them every now and then, but their matches are all high spot after high spot and it gets so goddamned overdone. Again, I dig them every now and then, but they're no where near the level of the Hardys, MNM, London and Kendrick, etc. Those teams know how to build drama in matches rather than nonstop "lets jump and do so many bullshit spots during this match and virtually kill ourselves".
And Jeff Hardy got over because of the spots, but that kind of shit can wear people's nerves thin after a while. If he were just a spot monkey, he wouldn't be THAT over. He's more than that, though. I'm not saying he's the greatest worker ever, but he's good enough that he doesn't need to do those high risk spots all the time and ever since he has returned he hasn't been doing that much unless the match required it.
Anyways. One other thing: People seem to be just judging Mick Foley on a select few matches in the WWE and forget that many of his brawls with Rock, Triple H, Austin, etc. All had substance. And this goes all the way back to his matches in WCW against Sting, Vader, etc.