relentless1
G.O.A.T.
I was just watching some of the feud that they had in the summer and fall of 2000 and these guys had a very compelling, real looking feud on their hands, definitely should have main evented at least one Starrcade and in my opinion, should have had a year long feud over the belt. Scott should have been pushed in 1998 in a parallel rise to the top of the card with Goldberg and he should have been the one to face and beat Goldberg at Starrcade that year instead of Kevin Nash. I have said on many occasions that Steiner should have been the one to hand Goldberg his first loss because Steiner as an unhinged lunatic with all that strength would have been the perfect foil for Goldbergs unstoppable monster, two titans that would never back down from each other, they could have been WCWs version of Stone Cold and the Rock...on steroids... What do you all think? Could this feud have elevated WCW in the post nWo era? Could they have held out longer against the WWF with a solid angle like this one?