Sidney Crosby made headlines locally on Friday, and for once with the like-able off-ice Penguins star, it was negative publicity. The issue? Crosby went to his local DMV to renew his Driver's License, and instead of being made to wait with the rest, he was ushered to the front. Avoiding the lines and the wait that we've all experienced, Crosby was in and out in less then fifteen minutes.
And for me, that was the proper way to handle it.
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/state/penndot-treats-penguin-with-kid-gloves-698800/
According to Pennsylvania law, supervisors at local DMV's are given discretion to allow celebrities to go to the "front of the line" based on the furvor and commotion their presence may cause. The law according to DMV spokeswoman Jan McKnight, was put into place in order to actually decreasewait times, as their presence just standing in line would cause unnecessary delays due to autograph seekers and the like McKnight said:
And there, I suppose, are the pros and cons equated with the situation. For me, this isn't the case of an athlete or celebrity using his star power to take someone's reservation at a restaurant, or having to skip a wait. This wasn't Crosby coming to renew his license and bringing ten friends with him that needed to also. This was simply a matter of practicality. Fans get star-struck, and when they do, they do anything from requesting autographs to attempting to engage them in long conversation. A place like the DMV is based upon structure and a variety of services, and having a commotion such as Crosby waiting in line would, in all likelihood, make wait times longer for everyone.
From a practical standpoint, how much of an inconvenience to others was his 'line jumping', truly? DMVs by nature are a service that require long waits. As Ms. Campbell said, she was there for an hour-and-a-half with her younger daughter. Yet Crosby was in and out in 15 minutes, tops. How much does one person, being processed ahead, truly extend one's wait time?
There are other places and times where arguing 'double standard' or 'preferential treatment' are far more appropriate then this, I believe.There are plenty of other battles to pick with celebrities with far more legitimacy and ego involved then this one. Crosby followed the law as outlined by the State and in accordance with the DMV, caused little inconvenience for others, and likely saved the patrons and the licensing center from a disruption in the normal process.
Are there situations where celebrities should be afforded 'preferential treatment', and if so, is this one of them?
Feel free to discuss or bring up other examples with relation to the topic, and its appropriateness(or lack thereof) regarding celebrities and preferential treatment.
And for me, that was the proper way to handle it.
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/state/penndot-treats-penguin-with-kid-gloves-698800/
According to Pennsylvania law, supervisors at local DMV's are given discretion to allow celebrities to go to the "front of the line" based on the furvor and commotion their presence may cause. The law according to DMV spokeswoman Jan McKnight, was put into place in order to actually decreasewait times, as their presence just standing in line would cause unnecessary delays due to autograph seekers and the like McKnight said:
Including the very author of this article, some of those waiting in line at the time, including 46 year old Susan Campbell, were upset by this, and disagree with the State policy:The decision is based on how much potential the celebrity has to create a furor that causes delays for everyone. If they walk in and the place goes crazy with fans, we would just move them in and out. It's a matter of keeping control and keeping disruptions to a minimum.
Phrases being bantered around by others included 'double standard' & 'preferential treatment', and that moving Crosby or another celebrity to the front of the line sends the message that said celebrities are more important than the average citizen. However, Ms. Campbell's other daughter herself, 22-year-old Stephanie, disagrees:"I disapprove. I spent an hour and half at the center waiting in line twice with my daughter Jessica helping her renew her license before heading off to college. He should have to sit and wait with everyone else."
"That would be so disruptive(making Crosby wait in-line) After all, people waiting with Mr. Crosby would text pictures to their friends and his fans would overrun the DMV in no time. If I knew he was going to be there, I'd be down there in five seconds".
And there, I suppose, are the pros and cons equated with the situation. For me, this isn't the case of an athlete or celebrity using his star power to take someone's reservation at a restaurant, or having to skip a wait. This wasn't Crosby coming to renew his license and bringing ten friends with him that needed to also. This was simply a matter of practicality. Fans get star-struck, and when they do, they do anything from requesting autographs to attempting to engage them in long conversation. A place like the DMV is based upon structure and a variety of services, and having a commotion such as Crosby waiting in line would, in all likelihood, make wait times longer for everyone.
From a practical standpoint, how much of an inconvenience to others was his 'line jumping', truly? DMVs by nature are a service that require long waits. As Ms. Campbell said, she was there for an hour-and-a-half with her younger daughter. Yet Crosby was in and out in 15 minutes, tops. How much does one person, being processed ahead, truly extend one's wait time?
There are other places and times where arguing 'double standard' or 'preferential treatment' are far more appropriate then this, I believe.There are plenty of other battles to pick with celebrities with far more legitimacy and ego involved then this one. Crosby followed the law as outlined by the State and in accordance with the DMV, caused little inconvenience for others, and likely saved the patrons and the licensing center from a disruption in the normal process.
Are there situations where celebrities should be afforded 'preferential treatment', and if so, is this one of them?
Feel free to discuss or bring up other examples with relation to the topic, and its appropriateness(or lack thereof) regarding celebrities and preferential treatment.