Lessening the number of PPV's would be smart. They currently do 13 or 14 per year, which is ridiculous. Several of them are not needed and could be done away with completely. Here is the lineup that I would do:
January: Royal Rumble
February: Elimination Chamber
March/April: Wrestlemania
May/June: Money In the Bank
August: Summerslam
September/October: Night of Champions
November: Survivor Series
December: TLC
The first three are obvious, the road to Wrestlemania. Extreme Rules is worthless, so it goes. Over the Limit has had decent cards, but it really isn't needed. Fatal Fourway seems to be gone for good, and I'm nearly 100% convinced that Capitol Punishment will be joining it. MITB is needed and should remain unless they bring that match back to Wrestlemania. Summerslam obviously stays. Night of Champions is my favorite PPV other than the Big 4 so I would not want to see it go. Having every title on the line is awesome, unlike the Miz. Survivor Series stays out of history. TLC got to stay due to it being 4 gimmicks in one (tables, ladders, chairs, TLC) and the best of the new gimmick themed shows.
If there were less PPV's then fans would feel more inclined to buy the next show because the feuds will be able to last long enough for WWE to make us care, and we as fans wouldn't have to find a way to save up as much money for ordering monthly PPV's. WWE would make more money and we get better quality shows, so everyone wins if they did less PPV's. Does that mean they'd actually go through with it though? Of course not. Unfortunately.
January: Royal Rumble
February: Elimination Chamber
March/April: Wrestlemania
May/June: Money In the Bank
August: Summerslam
September/October: Night of Champions
November: Survivor Series
December: TLC
The first three are obvious, the road to Wrestlemania. Extreme Rules is worthless, so it goes. Over the Limit has had decent cards, but it really isn't needed. Fatal Fourway seems to be gone for good, and I'm nearly 100% convinced that Capitol Punishment will be joining it. MITB is needed and should remain unless they bring that match back to Wrestlemania. Summerslam obviously stays. Night of Champions is my favorite PPV other than the Big 4 so I would not want to see it go. Having every title on the line is awesome, unlike the Miz. Survivor Series stays out of history. TLC got to stay due to it being 4 gimmicks in one (tables, ladders, chairs, TLC) and the best of the new gimmick themed shows.
If there were less PPV's then fans would feel more inclined to buy the next show because the feuds will be able to last long enough for WWE to make us care, and we as fans wouldn't have to find a way to save up as much money for ordering monthly PPV's. WWE would make more money and we get better quality shows, so everyone wins if they did less PPV's. Does that mean they'd actually go through with it though? Of course not. Unfortunately.