HBK-aholic
Shawn Michaels ❤
We all know the WWE is currently working under a PG rating. This limits what they can do to an extent. While I'm of the opinion things haven't changed as much as critics would allow you to think, things are different now. The programme is often geared towards an audience of children.
However, as these children grow up, they could become one of the critics - believing the WWE to be for children only and stop watching. To stop this happening, should the WWE abandon it's PG rating as the current set of fans age, or should they assume new fans will be there to take the places of those who leave the product?
I'm of the opinion they have no need to change. At 17 I'm older than some fans, yet a lot younger than others. I've watched wrestling all my life, throughout all the different changes, and I really love the PG era, and I know adults that do. I don't see the PG era as such a big deal, and while some people will stop watching as they age, that's going to happen whether the WWE changes or not.
This thread is NOT to discuss how bad the PG era is, so keep it out of here.
However, as these children grow up, they could become one of the critics - believing the WWE to be for children only and stop watching. To stop this happening, should the WWE abandon it's PG rating as the current set of fans age, or should they assume new fans will be there to take the places of those who leave the product?
I'm of the opinion they have no need to change. At 17 I'm older than some fans, yet a lot younger than others. I've watched wrestling all my life, throughout all the different changes, and I really love the PG era, and I know adults that do. I don't see the PG era as such a big deal, and while some people will stop watching as they age, that's going to happen whether the WWE changes or not.
This thread is NOT to discuss how bad the PG era is, so keep it out of here.